Midsize Firms' Geographic Expansions Span the Strategic Map
Firms open offices for many reasons—serving a client, personal needs of attorneys and the occasional "no-brainer" merger.
May 17, 2018 at 11:39 AM
4 minute read
There was a time when law firms didn't need a button on their websites to list office locations because they had only one.
That's largely not the case anymore—including for some midsize firms in the Southeast with offices in Atlanta. Conversations with leaders at Hall Booth Smith, Miller & Martin and Stites & Harbison show that their reasons for expanding vary. One move might stem from needing to help a client in a particular spot. Another opens in a new location to grab a well-known litigator there. Yet another firm might let a lawyer plant a flag elsewhere because his family has to move.
Robert M. Connolly, who chairs 170-lawyer Stites & Harbison from Louisville, Kentucky, notes that technology makes it simple for lawyers to work from any location. But some of the reasons his firm has 10 offices across Kentucky, Tennessee, Georgia, Indiana and Virginia include: “Proximity to the courthouse saves money for clients. Knowledge of the judge and local bar are very helpful in preparing litigation strategy.” Also, some states require the active involvement of counsel licensed in that jurisdiction.
Atlanta-based Hall Booth Smith has been expanding around the Southeast since 1999. It started first in smaller cities around Georgia, where it now has six offices. It also has launched outposts in Florida (three offices), Tennessee (two), North Carolina (two), South Carolina and Alabama (one each). Last week it opened its 15th office, in Tallahassee, Florida.
Managing partner Alex Booth said that, while the firm is always interested in expanding its client base, the moves were aimed at expanding services to its established clients in core practice areas, which include representing insurers of professionals and hospitals.
He said the firm sent a representative from Atlanta to help open some early offices, while others were prompted by Hall Booth lawyers who wanted to move, for example, to the Georgia coast, Charleston and Nashville. Many other new offices have grown out of the most previous move, as occurred in Florida.
He said lawyers in the relatively new Jacksonville office suggested the firm consider meeting Bill Fuller, a veteran trial lawyer in Tallahassee. “It was a no-brainer,” Booth said.
In other cities, he added, “We've been fortunate to be introduced” to new partners.
Booth said he expects any further expansion would occur in the region, save for a “unique opportunity” somewhere else.
“The Southeast makes sense,” he said of the firm, which is approaching 200 lawyers overall.
Miller & Martin, a 150-year-old firm that started in Chattanooga, Tennessse, doesn't like to grow for the sake of growth, but it has opened offices for either “opportunistic” or “strategic” reasons, said Chris Parker, an Atlanta litigation partner on the firm's policy committee.
During the 1990s, the firm opened an office in Atlanta to serve a particular client. Later, it merged with a smaller firm in Nashville to work with clients on legislative affairs matters in the Tennessee capital.
Last year, a partner needed to move to Charlotte, North Carolina, and with the city being a major Southeast hub for business, the firm opened an office there.
“We're actively looking” for possibilities in north Florida or Alabama, he said.
Connolly of Stites & Harbison said most of the firm's expansions came through mergers.
“Merging two firms is never easy,” he said. “However, if the cultures are compatible and the strategic advantages outweigh the inconvenience of learning new systems or procedures, then most people will work hard to accommodate the changes.”
For more business of law coverage exclusively geared toward midsize firms, sign up for a free trial of ALM's new weekly newsletter, The Mid-Market Report.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSpalding Jurors Return $12M Verdict Against State Farm Insurance Client
10 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Thinking Outside the RFP: AI’s Impact Beyond Scaling Review Efficiency
- 2Special Series Part 4: The Statutory Guardrails Impermissibly Bind Future Legislatures
- 3New York Court of Appeals Blocks Trump Attempt to Stay Friday Sentencing
- 4'Self-Diagnosed Nickel Allergy' Fails to Find Success in Med-Mal Suit, 8th Circuit Rules
- 5Eversheds Sutherland Adds Hunton Andrews Energy Lawyer With Cross-Border Experience
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250