Man Convicted of Child Rape, Later Pardoned, Need Not Register as Sex Offender, Court Rules
The Georgia Supreme Court ruled Monday that a man who previously pleaded guilty to sexually assaulting his 6-year-old daughter does not have to register as a sex offender because he was later deemed rehabilitated and pardoned.
May 21, 2018 at 03:02 PM
5 minute read
The Georgia Supreme Court ruled Monday that a man who previously pleaded guilty to sexually assaulting his 6-year-old daughter does not have to register as a sex offender because he was later deemed rehabilitated and pardoned.
In a unanimous opinion written by Justice Michael Boggs, the high court has reversed a Chatham County Superior Court judge who had said Barry Craig Davis was required to inform authorities when he moved from Savannah to Charlotte, North Carolina, after completing his sentence. Defense attorneys for Davis appealed, arguing that he no longer had to inform the Chatham County sheriff of his address and travels because the Georgia Board of Pardons and Paroles had granted him a pardon.
“A pardon is a declaration of record that a person is relieved from the legal consequences of a particular conviction. It restores civil and political rights and removes all legal disabilities resulting from the conviction,” Boggs wrote. “We therefore hold that inclusion on the sex offender registry pursuant to Georgia Code § 42-1-12 is a legal consequence of the underlying criminal offense and a disability imposed by law; that Davis' pardon by its express terms removed all disabilities under Georgia law resulting from his conviction and relieved all the legal consequences thereof; and that it restored all of his civil and political rights, excepting only his firearm rights.”
So, Davis still can't carry a gun. But, unlike other convicted sex offenders in Georgia, he can live or work near a school, interact with children and travel or relocate without disclosing his location, according to the ruling.
The winning lawyers are Savannah public defenders Amy Lee Ihrig and Robert Lawrence Persse.
On the losing side: Chatham County District Attorney Meg Heap. The Prosecuting Attorneys Council of Georgia and other district attorneys filed amicus briefs in support of the prosecution's position.
The attorneys were not immediately available for comment.
According to the decision, in 1995, Davis pleaded guilty to the aggravated sodomy of his 6-year-old daughter. Under Georgia law, a person commits sodomy by performing or submitting to a sexual act involving the sex organs of one person and the mouth or anus of another. Aggravated sodomy involves sodomy by force, against a person's will, or with a child younger than 10 years old. Davis was sentenced to 10 years, with the first two to be served in prison. Following his release from prison, Davis served the remainder of his sentence on probation until it ended on July 15, 2005. Under Georgia statutory law (Georgia Code § 42-1-12), Davis was required to register as a sex offender, which he did.
Davis later applied for a pardon. The Georgia Constitution vests the parole board with exclusive power and authority over “executive clemency, including the powers to grant reprieves, pardons, and paroles; to commute penalties; to remove disabilities imposed by law; and to remit any part of a sentence for any offense against the state after conviction,” Boggs wrote. On Feb. 13, 2013, the parole board granted Davis a pardon. According to the court, the board said its investigation had revealed Davis “is a law-abiding citizen and is fully rehabilitated,” and therefore “without implying innocence, hereby unconditionally pardons said individual, and it is hereby ordered that all disabilities under Georgia law resulting from the above stated conviction and sentence … are hereby removed; and ordered further that all civil and political rights, except the right to receive, possess, or transport in commerce a firearm … are hereby restored.”
A month after receiving the pardon, Davis moved from Savannah to Charlotte, North Carolina, without giving notice to the Chatham County Sheriff's Office, the court said. Georgia Code § 42-1-12 requires convicted sex offenders to give notice at least 72 hours before moving. When Davis returned to Georgia, the sheriff's office informed Davis of his failure to register and give notice of his plan to move. Davis claimed that his pardon removed the previous requirement for him to register as a sex offender. Nevertheless, the sheriff's office obtained a warrant for Davis' arrest, and on Feb. 26, 2014, the state charged Davis in an indictment with failing to register as a sex offender, which is a felony.
Davis argued that the requirement to register as a sex offender constituted a “legal disability,” which the parole board's pardon had removed. The local judge disagreed. The Georgia Court of Appeals reversed the judge, but the high court ruled Monday that the Court of Appeals did not have authority to review the case because the Supreme Court has exclusive jurisdiction over constitutional questions. So Boggs, in reversing the trial judge, also vacated the intermediate court's ruling.
The case is State v. Davis, No. S17G1333.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllOn The Move: Squire Patton Boggs, Akerman Among Four Firms Adding Atlanta Partners
7 minute readJustice 'Weaponization Working Group' Will Examine Officials Who Investigated Trump, US AG Bondi Says
Trending Stories
- 1States Accuse Trump of Thwarting Court's Funding Restoration Order
- 2Microsoft Becomes Latest Tech Company to Face Claims of Stealing Marketing Commissions From Influencers
- 3Coral Gables Attorney Busted for Stalking Lawyer
- 4Trump's DOJ Delays Releasing Jan. 6 FBI Agents List Under Consent Order
- 5Securities Report Says That 2024 Settlements Passed a Total of $5.2B
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250