Georgia Bar Pass Rate Climbs for First-Time Takers
First-time test-takers from Georgia law schools showed improvement, but repeaters overall did worse, which dragged down the overall pass rate.
May 22, 2018 at 01:59 PM
4 minute read
In a positive sign, the pass rate for Georgia's February bar exam continued to improve for first-time test-takers.
Of the 257 first-timers who took the February exam, 70.4 percent passed—up two percentage points from the 68.3 percent who passed the prior February exam, according to data released by the Georgia Office of Bar Admissions on Monday.
That said, the overall bar pass rate declined to 47 percent from 51.1 percent for the February 2017 exam.
“The first-time takers overall did better, and repeaters did a little worse,” said John Sammon, the executive director of the Georgia Office of Bar Admissions. “The overall result was down, but I find it encouraging that first-time takers did better.”
The February results marked the second consecutive year of gains in the first-time pass rate for the winter Georgia bar exam. The 68.3 percent first-time pass rate for the February 2017 exam was up from 64.5 percent for the February 2016 exam.
Similarly, the pass rate increased for the July 2017 exam for the first time after five years of declines. For the July exam, 66.9 percent of total test-takers passed (up 1.1 percentage points from the previous July) and 76.3 percent of first-timers passed (up 4.1 percentage points).
The other big development for the February exam, Sammon said, was the improved performance for first-time test-takers from Georgia law schools. The pass rate for that group jumped 8.4 points, from 53.9 percent last February to 62.3 percent for this exam.
All the Georgia law schools have placed a lot of focus on preparing their students for the bar exam since the pass rate started to drop a few years ago, Sammon added. “That's why, to me, it's so encouraging to see the first-time takers do better.”
The gains were most pronounced for Georgia State University College of Law's first-time exam-takers. Their bar pass rate shot up from 70.6 percent last year to 88 percent for this year's February exam.
“I was very pleased with GSU Law's first-timer results,” Sammon said.
Even so, the February bar pass rates are not as reliable an indicator as pass rates for the July exam, due to the much smaller sample size, Sammon cautioned.
A total of 77 first-timers from Georgia schools took the February exam, for example, compared with 601 first-timers for the July exam from those schools.
The surge in the pass rate for first-time takers at GSU Law gave it the highest pass rate among Georgia law schools.
Emory University School of Law saw similar gains, with a first-time pass rate of 75 percent, up from 55.6 percent for the previous February, but Emory had only eight first-time exam-takers, compared with 31 at GSU.
Pass rates were tied at 66.7 percent for first-time exam-takers at the University of Georgia and Mercer University. But UGA Law's 66.7 percent first-time pass rate dropped from 71.4 percent for the prior February exam, while Mercer's 66.7 percent pass rate jumped from 20 percent.
The sharp fluctuation is because the number of first-timers at these schools was quite small—all in the single-digits.
UGA and Mercer fielded only three first-time test-takers apiece for the February exam, and two of the three students passed. That compares with seven UGA and five Mercer first-timers taking the exam the prior year.
For John Marshall's Atlanta and Savannah campuses combined, the first-time pass rate dropped from 38.2 percent last year to 34.4 percent for the February exam. There were 32 first-time test-takers.
However the separate pass rates for the two schools were sharply different. John Marshall's 25 first-time takers achieved a 24 percent pass rate, compared with a 71.4 percent pass rate for Savannah Law School's seven first-timers.
Overall, 608 people took the February exam, including first-time law school graduates, repeaters and lawyers from out of state, compared with 1,292 exam-takers last July.
This story has been updated to break out separate first-time pass rates for Atlanta's John Marshall Law School and Savannah Law School.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGeorgia High Court Clarifies Time Limit for Lawyers' Breach-of-Contract Claims
6 minute readSoutheast Firm Leaders Predict Stability, Growth in Second Trump Administration
4 minute readKing & Spalding Adds Veteran Antitrust Litigator From White & Case in New York
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Elon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
- 2Trump’s Plan to Purge Democracy
- 3Baltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
- 4X Joins Legal Attack on California's New Deepfakes Law
- 5Monsanto Wins Latest Philadelphia Roundup Trial
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250