Doraville Sued Over Claims City Uses Municipal Court to Boost Revenues
A public interest law group has filed a federal lawsuit claiming the City of Doraville is relying on Municipal Court fines and fees generated by traffic tickets and city ordinance violations to unconstitutionally bolster city revenues.
May 24, 2018 at 03:49 PM
4 minute read
Doraville's Municipal Court fined Hilda Brucker and put her on probation for six months after giving her multiple citations for chipped paint on the fascia boards of her house, weeds in her backyard, ivy on a tree, vines on the house and cracked driveway pavement.
Jeff Thornton was served with an arrest warrant and fined $1,000 by Doraville because logs he stored in backyard for his woodworking hobby were not cut in 4 x 4 x 8 sections. There were also buckets, yard trimmings and a screen resting against the side of his house, all code violations.
Their experiences with Doraville's Municipal Court are not unique, but they are unconstitutional, according to a federal lawsuit filed Thursday against the suburban Atlanta city.
Doraville Municipal Court is also routinely flouting U.S. Supreme Court precedent by operating primarily as a revenue-generating device to keep the city government afloat, according to lawyers with the Institute for Justice, a public interest law group that sued on behalf of Brucker, Thornton and two other plaintiffs who were ticketed while driving through Doraville.
The plaintiffs are asking a federal judge to stop the city from ticketing and convicting residents and visitors in order to generate operating revenue.
Municipalities that rely on fines and forfeitures from traffic tickets and code violations to balance their budgets create financial incentives to ticket, convict and fine people, according to the lawsuit. That's what Doraville, population 8,330, is doing, according to the suit.
“This financial incentive to convict infects Doraville's municipal court with a bias or an appearance of bias in violation of the U.S. Constitution,” the suit contends.
Doraville City Manager Regina Williams-Gates was in a closed-door meeting Thursday and could not be reached for comment.
“Doraville is one of the worst ticketers in the country,” said Joshua House, an attorney with the Institute of Justice. Frank Strickland of Atlanta's Strickland Brockington Lewis is local counsel.
A review of four years of city audits revealed that Doraville relies on municipal court fines for 24 percent or more of its annual revenues, according to the institute. The national average is 3 percent to 4 percent, House said.
House said a city finance expert the institute hired for similar litigation against the city of Pagedale, Missouri, said that, if municipal court fines make up more than 7 percent of a city's revenue, that would raise “red flags” about the constitutionality of its operations.
“You don't want to create a system where, if everyone obeyed the law, the city would be bankrupt,” House said.
According to the suit, between August 2016 and August 2017, Doraville's Municipal Court assessed approximately $3.84 million in fines. According to the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, Doraville ranked sixth in the nation among cities with populations greater than 5,000 for the proportion of its city budget generated by court fines, fees and forfeitures.
The suit also cites a 2015 Doraville City Council report noting that an increase in municipal court dates “translate into additional revenues” and “resulted in increased collections.”
The suit also contends the city council has passed ordinances criminalizing misdemeanor code violations.The standard penalty for any violation of the Doraville Municipal Code is a criminal misdemeanor of up to $1,000 or six months in jail, according to the suit.
The city also retained architectural firm Clark Patterson Lee to police property code violations on its behalf, according to the suit.
The lawsuit also points to Doraville as one of Georgia's worst “speed traps,” citing a 2014 Atlanta Journal-Constitution investigation that reported Doraville police officers averaged 40 tickets a day—more per capita than any other metro Atlanta jurisdiction.
House said his organization has no data on whether Doraville police and code enforcement officers are targeting people of color.
“This is one of those issues where the color that is at issue in this case is green,” he said. “Our research has shown it has more to do with needing money.”
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFowler White Burnett Opens Jacksonville Office Focused on Transportation Practice
3 minute readOn The Move: Polsinelli Adds Health Care Litigator in Nashville, Ex-SEC Enforcer Joins BCLP in Atlanta
6 minute readWoman's Suit Alleging Negligence to Sex Trafficking by Hotel Tossed by Federal Judge
Trending Stories
- 1Bar Report — Nov. 25, 2024
- 2People in the News—Nov. 25, 2024—Eckert Seamans, Klehr Harrison
- 3How We Made Practice Group Chair: 'One of the Most Important Skills Is Being a Good Listener,' Say Timothy Kincaid and Brad Vaiana of Winston & Strawn
- 4Avoiding Inadvertent Conflict Issues With Constituents When Representing Organizational Clients
- 5Debtor-Owner Allowed to Modify Mortgage in Bankruptcy Even if Debtor Is Not Obligor Under the Mortgage Loan
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250