Gwinnett Jury Awards $5.6M in Fatal Interstate 285 Motorcycle Wreck
In a three-vehicle wreck that left a motorcyclist dead, the jury awarded a total $7.5 million in damages, dividing 25 percent of the blame between the deceased biker and another truck driver involved.
May 29, 2018 at 01:59 PM
4 minute read
A Gwinnett County jury delivered a post-apportioned award of more than $5.6 million to the family of a motorcyclist killed when he was hit by a van on Interstate 285 and slid beneath a truck.
Retired U.S. Navy veteran Frederick Fennell Jr., 65, died at the scene after being tapped and overturned by a Charter Communications van. His girlfriend, Teresa Wilson, was also thrown from the bike and suffered two broken arms and other injuries, according to the complaint and plaintiffs attorney Ketan Patel of Tyrone's Corpus Law.
“There was a lot of traffic, this was a low-speed collision and wreck,” said Patel, who was associated into the case to assist originating attorneys Kavan Grover and W. Hennen Ehrenclou of Ehrenclou & Grover.
The defendants at trial, Charter Communications and driver Stanton Jenkins, were defended by Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith partner Rachel Krause and associate Donovan Eason. Krause declined to comment.
The wreck happened at about 4 p.m. on a Friday when expressway traffic near the Chamblee-Tucker Road exit was heavy.
Fennell's Harley-Davidson was in the lane between the Charter van and a box truck belonging to trucking company J.B. Hunt when the van “made an abrupt right lane change and knocked our guy off his bike,” Patel said.
Both Fennell and Wilson slid across the highway, but Fennell's head and torso were crushed beneath the wheel of the box truck.
No one was cited for the wreck, Patel said.
“The initial report did find fault for improper lane change [against the Charter driver],” he said, adding the investigating officer treated it as a nolle prosse from the beginning.
Wilson sued Charter in Fulton County State Court. Her negligence suit settled and was dismissed with prejudice in March.
As to Fennell, Grover said there were never any presuit settlement demands or offers. His four children and estate executor sued Charter and Jenkins in May 2015, as well as J.B. Hunt and its driver, Michael Rothwell, in Gwinnett County State Court.
The negligence suit accused both defendant drivers of improper lane change, failure to maintain lane and reckless driving.
A mediation before Rex Smith of Henning Mediation and Arbitration Services failed to resolve the case, and it was scheduled for trial on May 14 before Gwinnett State Court Senior Judge Robert Mock Sr.
The morning of trial, Grover said J.B. Hunt resolved its claims with the plaintiffs and was dismissed from the case.
Trial proceeded against Charter and driver Stanton Jenkins.
Charter's “specific contentions were that they were not liable, that Mr. Fennell was responsible for the collision,” said Grover. Charter said Fennell violated a state law barring a motorcycle from overtaking and passing a vehicle in the same lane, and for improper lane change, he said.
“They also said, if they were liable, Mr. Fennell and [Hunt's driver] Rothwell contributed to the wreck,” he said.
Key experts at trial included Atlanta accident reconstructionists Soan Chau for the plaintiffs and Villa Rica's Dwayne Canupp for the defense.
At closing, Patel said the plaintiffs counsel asked for $7.5 million for the value of Fennells' life and another $1 million for pain and suffering.
The defense asked for a defense verdict or, if damages were to be awarded, between $200,000 and $400,000, he said.
The jury began deliberations on Friday, May 18 and returned Monday for a total of about five hours of deliberations
The panel found negligence on the part of Jenkins, Rothwell and Fennell and awarded $7.5 million in damages. But it apportioned 12.5 percent each to Fennell and Rothwell, for a total award of nearly $5.6 million.
In conversation with jurors afterward, Patel said “most thought Mr. Fennell was not at fault, but there was one individual who thought there was equal fault. So they compromised and gave us what we wanted, then apportioned fault to Mr. Fennell and Rothwell,” he said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllOn the Move: Hunton Andrews Kurth Practice Leader Named Charlotte Managing Partner
6 minute readPaul Weiss’ Shanmugam Joins 11th Circuit Fight Over False Claims Act’s Constitutionality
Atlanta Attorneys Rely on Google Earth, YouTube for Evidence in $6M Faulty Guardrail Settlement
Trending Stories
- 1As 'Red Hot' 2024 for Legal Industry Comes to Close, Leaders Reflect and Share Expectations for Next Year
- 2Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 3Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 4Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 5Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250