Court of Appeals Revives Teacher Pension Lawsuit
Presiding Judge John Ellington wrote for a panel that included Judge Charlie Bethel and Senior Judge Herbert Phipps in a June 1 decision reversing DeKalb County Superior Court Judge Gregory Adams, who tossed out the teachers' case.
June 08, 2018 at 02:45 PM
4 minute read
Teachers who contend the DeKalb County Board of Education illegally ended contributions to their retirement fund have won a victory with the Georgia Court of Appeals.
Presiding Judge John Ellington wrote for a panel that included Judge Charlie Bethel and Senior Judge Herbert Phipps in a June 1 decision reversing DeKalb County Superior Court Judge Gregory Adams, who tossed out the teachers' case.
The teachers “contend that the court's order was erroneous because the evidence shows the existence of an enforceable 'governmental promise' that required two years' notice before reducing or suspending funding,” Ellington said. “We agree and reverse the judgment of the superior court on the issue of liability.”
The panel remanded the case to DeKalb Superior Court to consider the teachers' claims. They have asked for summary judgment in their favor and for certification of a class action for the teachers.
The teachers' legal team includes Michael Terry of Bondurant Mixson & Elmore, who made their case at oral arguments before the panel, as well as Jason Carter of Bondurant and former Gov. Roy Barnes and John Salter of the Barnes Law Group.
Barnes Law Group released the following statement from plaintiff Elaine Gold:
“Ever since the district broke its promise to us in 2009 they have fought tooth and nail—for almost ten years. The district's decision to bully teachers instead of doing what was right has dragged this case out. We feel so happy that a court finally said that what the district has been doing is wrong and that the district has to keep its promises.”
The school district was represented by Allegra Lawrence-Hardy, Thomas Bundy III, Lisa Haldar and Leslie Bryan of Lawrence & Bundy.
The defense attorneys deferred to the school district, which emailed this response: “The District received the decision of the Georgia Court of Appeals in the Gold case last week. The District is reviewing the decision carefully and considering its next steps.”
Ellington gave a detailed history of the DeKalb teachers' pension program, which was created like those of other school districts that opted during the 1970s to create an alternative to Social Security retirement benefits. The dispute dates to 2009 and the Great Recession, when then-Gov. Sonny Perdue announced a 3 percent reduction in state funding for all Georgia school systems.
“In an effort to manage the expected loss of up to $20 million in state funding and the resulting budget deficit, the board decided to suspend contributions” to the teachers retirement plan, Ellington said. “Although the board notified employees that funding of the [retirement] plan would be suspended, it did not give two years' notice prior to suspending funding.”
Ellington pointed to “evidence in the record from which a fact-finder could infer” that the school board was aware that suspending funding to the retirement plan without the required two-year notice violated its own policies.
Furthermore, Ellington said, “There is no evidence in the record that the district has restored any funding.” He said that, in June 2010, the school board “amended its by-laws and policies to remove the two-year notice provision.”
The board disputed the two-year notice requirement, but the teachers argued that failing to meet it made the budget cuts illegal. The $20 million on the line for the year the contributions were cut, multiplied by the 10 years of budgets since, could mean $200 million or more is at stake in the case.
The case is Elaine Gold et al. v. DeKalb County School District, No. A18A0526.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllOn The Move: Energy Infrastructure Pro Joins Moore & Van Allen, Adams & Reese Changes Atlanta Leadership
6 minute read40% Contingency: A New Ruling Just Cost This Plaintiff Team $827K in Legal Fees
6 minute read'David and Goliath' Dispute Between Software Developers Ends in $24M Settlement
Trending Stories
- 1'It's Not Going to Be Pretty': PayPal, Capital One Face Novel Class Actions Over 'Poaching' Commissions Owed Influencers
- 211th Circuit Rejects Trump's Emergency Request as DOJ Prepares to Release Special Counsel's Final Report
- 3Supreme Court Takes Up Challenge to ACA Task Force
- 4'Tragedy of Unspeakable Proportions:' Could Edison, DWP, Face Lawsuits Over LA Wildfires?
- 5Meta Pulls Plug on DEI Programs
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250