Landlord Hit With $4.2M Default Judgment in Pit Bull Attack
The attorney for the injured woman said the owner of the property where she was attacked never responded to the Fulton County lawsuit. Now, he intends to go after properties the defendant owns to satisfy the judgment.
June 12, 2018 at 05:59 PM
4 minute read
A woman mauled by a pit bull terrier dog at a southwest Atlanta rooming house was granted a $4.2 million default judgment against the property's owner. Morgan & Morgan attorney Joshua Davis said he is under no illusion that property owner Jonathan Hart, who never responded to a lawsuit seeking about $60,000 in medical bills and other damages, can cover the hefty judgment. In addition to the rooming house, he said Hart apparently holds interests in multiple properties that Davis intends to go after. “That's one of the reasons I was so surprised he never responded,” Davis said. “He has experience; he knows the game. That's why it was so baffling that he never responded when I requested his insurance information. He could have probably settled for his policy limit.” Hart did not respond to an email address listed on court filings for him. A man who answered the phone number listed for him profanely shouted he had no money and would not identify himself before hanging up. According to Davis, co-counsel Miguel Dominguez and court filings, the case began when Nakisa Hiles, 40, needed a place to stay in 2016. Hart offered her a room at a house on Montreat Avenue, where several other people lived. Hiles was attempting to enter the rear door of the house her first day there when a pit bull chained in the backyard broke free and attacked her, biting her repeatedly on her right leg and ankle. “She had 32 stitches on her shin alone,” said Davis, and developed an infection. “It was obviously very traumatic. She walks with a permanent limp now.” Davis said Hiles has tried to work but cannot stand for any length of time because of her injuries. Her studies for a bachelor's degree in business administration suffered because of the pain medication she takes. He said the dog was apparently owned by a prior tenant who died some months earlier. “Technically it was nobody's dog,” said Davis. “The other tenants would throw it scraps. Apparently other neighbors had complained about it getting off the chain.” Davis said Hart assiduously avoided Hiles in the months after the accident, refusing to speak to her or to collect rent. After she contacted Davis, who began trying to get insurance information from Hart, the landlord filed a dispossessory action against Hiles in Fulton County Magistrate Court. “He never sent an eviction letter, he never responded to my requests or was available for service,” Davis said. “I think he got caught up trying not to deal with this dog bite,” Davis said. “I guess he thought it was going to go away.” Hart also missed a dispossessory hearing last year, during which Davis asked that the case be moved to State Court to deal with Hiles' counterclaims. Judge Wesley Tailor set a June 1 trial date. “We waited almost an hour and [Hart] didn't appear,” Davis said. “I had filed a notice of default, so I put on my full case for the judge.” Davis said he asked for $11 million in damages. Tailor retired to his chambers and returned after about 20 minutes with a judgment awarding $4.25 million The next step is to file a writ of fieri facias with the court to satisfy the judgment. “This is not some Joe Schmoe who owns one property,” he said. “I've found at least 16 properties associated with him."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCourt Advisory Committee Inches Forward on Transparency in Litigation Financing
Nashville DA Secretly Recorded Defense Lawyers, Other Office Visitors, Probe Finds
3 minute readJudge Sounds Alarm Over Persistent Circuit Split on 'Favorable Termination' Rule
Retired US Judge, Ethics Experts Ask 11th Circuit to Reassign Trump Classified Docs Case
Trending Stories
- 1Mass. Judge Declares Mistrial in Talc Trial: 'Court Can't Accommodate This Case'
- 2Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
- 3Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 4It's Time Law Firms Were Upfront About Who Their Salaried Partners Are
- 5The Law Firm Disrupted: Quality Partner Training—The Exception or the Rule?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250