Settlement Ends Insurer's Bid to Dodge $5.3M Excess Judgment
A few days after the Georgia Court of Appeals upheld several rulings by a DeKalb County judge in the underlying trial, Safe Auto Insurance settled its federal claims against the estate of a woman killed by a drunken driver.
June 15, 2018 at 12:02 PM
6 minute read
Nearly 10 years after a triple-fatality drunken driving wreck, an insurer suing in federal court to dodge a $5.3 million DeKalb County jury award has settled its claims with the estate of one of the victims. Safe Auto Insurance had sought a ruling from the district court that it only owed the $25,000 policy limit for its insured—the owner of the drunken driver's vehicle—and was not responsible for the excess judgment entered by the state court. The confidential settlement with the estate of one of the victims, Fatima Bird, came days after the Georgia Court of Appeals upheld several rulings by the trial court, including one barring apportionment of liability to a strip club accused of serving alcohol to the drunken driver, who also died in the wreck. The settlement ends a web of litigation that involved two trials and three trips to Court of Appeals, along with side trips to other venues, including Cobb County Superior Court and U.S. Bankruptcy Court. Attorney Trent Speckhals represents Bird's mother, Lisa Mitchell, who is also the conservator for Bird's two young daughters. “I can only report that the matter confidentially resolved to the parties' mutual satisfaction,” said Speckhals , saying he was also constrained in commenting on whether the Court of Appeals factored in the settlement. Slappey & Sadd partners Jay Sadd and Rich Dolder, who represented the estate of the deceased drunk driver in the federal litigation, also said they could only say the case resolved to everyone's satisfaction. Safe Auto's attorneys, Tracey Ledbetter and Michael Nelson of Eversheds Sutherland, did not respond to requests for comment. The case began in the early hours of July 5, 2008, when Otis South was driving the wrong way on Interstate 20 in his stepson's Lincoln Town Car and plowed head-on into Bird's Pontiac Sunbird, killing her and her friend Melissa Sinkfield. A third woman, Keondra Brown, was seriously injured. South's blood alcohol content was 0.398 percent, almost five times the legal limit. The Lincoln's owner, Travius Ryan, had a Safe Auto policy carrying a $25,000 per person/$50,000 per accident limit. After the wreck, Brown and Sinkfield's estate settled their claims for $25,000 apiece. Speckhals also sent a settlement offer for the policy's $25,000 limit, but he requested information about additional insurance coverage and set a 20-day time limit to respond. Safe Auto provided a copy of its policy, a policy declarations page initialed by a company representative, and a draft for $25,000. Speckhals requested the additional information again one day before the time limit expired, but it was not forthcoming. He informed the insurer the offer was withdrawn. In 2009, Speckhals filed suit on Mitchell's behalf in DeKalb State Court naming South's executor, Melinda Pillow, and Ryan as defendants. Ryan was later dismissed. The defense responded with a “motion to enforce the settlement,” arguing the $25,000 tendered the year before constituted a binding settlement. The trial judge denied the motion. Safe Auto then filed a declaratory judgment action against Mitchell in Cobb Superior Court, arguing it had exhausted its $50,000 per accident limit by paying the other two victims and owed no duty to defend the DeKalb suit or pay any potential judgment. Judge James Bodiford ruled Safe Auto had exhausted Ryan's policy limits and was “no longer contractually obligated to make any further payments under the terms” of the policy. But, he added, “the court is not making a ruling as to any potential bad faith claim which may be the subject of further litigation should there be a verdict in the jury trial before the State Court of DeKalb County.” In separate litigation Mitchell filed a dram shop complaint against Moreland Avenue strip bar Blazing Saddles, accusing it of serving South alcohol when he was already drunk. Blazing Saddles defaulted and was hit with a $1.75 million judgment in 2011 after a damages-only trial. The lawyers for Pillow, South's executor, attempted to apportion liability to Blazing Saddles, but DeKalb State Court Judge Stacey Hydrick refused to allow it and denied defense efforts to introduce evidence of the dram shop case at trial. Safe Auto filed a declaratory judgment action in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia in an effort to head off an excess judgment just before the case went to trial last year. The complaint noted that Bird “was a young woman and is alleged to have suffered tremendous pain and agony prior to her death.” “Given the pendency of the jury trial and the substantial likelihood of a judgment against the South estate, a bad faith suit against Safe Auto is imminent,” it said. In the federal action, Safe Auto reiterated that it had attempted to settle Mitchell's claims and thus could not be sued for “bad faith failure to settle.” Sure enough, the jury returned a verdict for $5.35 million against Pillow. Pillow appealed the verdict to the Georgia Court of Appeals, arguing that Hydrick should have allowed in evidence of the Blazing Saddles judgment and permitted the jury to apportion liability to it. On May 22, in an unpublished opinion written by Judge Gary Andrews, the state Court of Appeals upheld Hydricks' rulings excluding evidence and apportionment to Blazing Saddles, finding no direct evidence showing South had been served alcohol when he was drunk or that he had even been to the club the night of the wreck. One week later, as U.S District Judge Eleanor Ross was considering dueling summary judgment motions in the Safe Auto litigation, the parties requested a stay because they had reached a tentative settlement. The case was dismissed with prejudice on June 11. Speckhals said the settlement resolves all claims among Pillow, Mitchell and Safe Auto. As to that 2011 judgment against Blazing Saddles—which is now doing business as The Blaze—the Bankruptcy Court approved a settlement in 2013 whereby Bird's estate is receiving monthly payments toward the debt. Speckhals said the labyrinth of litigation is unlike any he's ever handled. Asked how many hours he's put into the case, Speckhals said, “After 1,000 hours, I stopped keeping time.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Paragraph V Displaced Lathrop': High Court Mulls Sovereign Immunity Waiver Disputes
7 minute read11th Circuit Revives Project Veritas' Defamation Lawsuit Against CNN
State Appeals Court 'Reluctantly' Remands $1.7B Punitive Damages, Sanctions Against Ford for Fatal Rollover
High Court to Weigh If Amended Complaints Establish Sovereign Immunity Waiver
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250