A disbarred lawyer who lost an appeal to have his meth convictions thrown out expressed no bitterness at the ruling. Instead, Rand Csehy took the opportunity to thank the judge and district attorney who intervened in his “out-of-control life.”  

The state Court of Appeals ruled Friday that, although a judge improperly ordered Csehy to submit to a urine test in violation of his Fourth Amendment rights, there was probable cause to issue a warrant for subsequent blood tests that formed the basis for his conviction.   

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]