State's SAAG Bill Shrinks Nearly 13 Percent as Water Wars Costs Drop
Georgia spent $44,997,972 on special attorney generals in the fiscal year that ended June 30, 2018, down from the $51,472,735 spent in the prior fiscal year, recently released Law Department figures show.
August 03, 2018 at 12:52 PM
4 minute read
Buoyed largely by a status change in Georgia's longrunning interstate water dispute, the state government's bill for private attorneys dropped a whopping 12.6 percent in the past fiscal year.
The state spent $44,997,972 on special assistant attorneys general, also known as SAAGs, in the fiscal year that ended June 30, 2018, according to recently released state Law Department figures. That figure is down from the $51,472,735 spent in the prior fiscal year and the $50,351,809 in the fiscal year before that.
Prior to the significant uptick in costs tied to the “water wars” with Alabama and Florida over the management of the Chatahoochee River Basin, the SAAG costs came in around $36 million and $33 million in fiscal years 2015 and 2014, respectively.
“The amount the state spends on SAAGs varies annually and will fluctuate based on the volume, type, and complexity of cases being handled each year,” a spokesperson for state Attorney General Chris Carr said in an email. “One of the reasons for the decrease in SAAG spending from FY 17-FY 18 is changes in spending on the Florida v. Georgia case due to the case being in different stages of litigation.”
In his role as head of the state Law Department, the AG can be viewed as the managing partner of one of Atlanta's largest law firms. Carr manages at least 455 lawyers, when the number of Law Department staff attorneys, about 150, is combined with the number of SAAGs, 305 in the past fiscal year.
The true number of SAAGs, however, is actually higher. The state hires SAAGs under one attorney's name, but multiple lawyers typically work under each official SAAG title.
Funding for SAAGs comes from the state agencies that use them, not the Law Department, although the costs are administered by and reflected in the Law Department's budget. In most cases, the state is paying SAAGs at below market value.
Dale “Bubba” Samuels, for example, says he charges a reduced rate of $200 an hour for his SAAG work, which is spread among the four lawyers and paralegal in his Buford firm. Samuels is one of three SAAGs who brought in more than $1 million from the state last fiscal year through a caseload that supported the Georgia Department of Transportation and included title work, as well as condemnation litigation.
Jeff Gaba, working closely with his partner Richard Calhoun, also earned more than $1 million in SAAG work last fiscal year. Like Samuels, much of his caseload supported the Georgia Department of Transportation.
Between June 2017 and June 2018, the pair of lawyers say they had nine active GDOT projects, as well as 45 to 50 condemnation cases, six of which went to trial.
“We do quite a bit for the state, and they're very, very large projects,” Gaba said. “Because we have five lawyers and three paralegals [doing the work] we can handle the very big projects.”
Added Calhoun, who handles the condemnation litigation: “I don't know what the other SAAGs are doing, but five or six trials in one year is a pretty busy schedule.”
In addition to the GDOT work, Gaba's caseload supported the Georgia Lottery Corp., Department of Natural Resources and Board of Regents, the AG spokesperson said.
The final SAAG to earn more than $1 million last fiscal year is Craig Primis, the Washington, D.C.-based Kirkland & Ellis partner who represented Georgia in the water wars. Primis could not be reached for comment about his SAAG work and fees.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGeorgia Appeals Court Cancels Hearing in Election Interference Case Against Trump
3 minute readJustice Department Says Fulton County Jail Conditions Violate Detainee Rights
6 minute readSupreme Court Rejects Push to Move Georgia Case Against Ex-Trump Chief of Staff Mark Meadows
3 minute read3 GOP States Join Paid Sick Leave Movement, Passing Ballot Measures by Wide Margins
5 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250