State's SAAG Bill Shrinks Nearly 13 Percent as Water Wars Costs Drop
Georgia spent $44,997,972 on special attorney generals in the fiscal year that ended June 30, 2018, down from the $51,472,735 spent in the prior fiscal year, recently released Law Department figures show.
August 03, 2018 at 12:52 PM
4 minute read
Buoyed largely by a status change in Georgia's longrunning interstate water dispute, the state government's bill for private attorneys dropped a whopping 12.6 percent in the past fiscal year.
The state spent $44,997,972 on special assistant attorneys general, also known as SAAGs, in the fiscal year that ended June 30, 2018, according to recently released state Law Department figures. That figure is down from the $51,472,735 spent in the prior fiscal year and the $50,351,809 in the fiscal year before that.
Prior to the significant uptick in costs tied to the “water wars” with Alabama and Florida over the management of the Chatahoochee River Basin, the SAAG costs came in around $36 million and $33 million in fiscal years 2015 and 2014, respectively.
“The amount the state spends on SAAGs varies annually and will fluctuate based on the volume, type, and complexity of cases being handled each year,” a spokesperson for state Attorney General Chris Carr said in an email. “One of the reasons for the decrease in SAAG spending from FY 17-FY 18 is changes in spending on the Florida v. Georgia case due to the case being in different stages of litigation.”
In his role as head of the state Law Department, the AG can be viewed as the managing partner of one of Atlanta's largest law firms. Carr manages at least 455 lawyers, when the number of Law Department staff attorneys, about 150, is combined with the number of SAAGs, 305 in the past fiscal year.
The true number of SAAGs, however, is actually higher. The state hires SAAGs under one attorney's name, but multiple lawyers typically work under each official SAAG title.
Funding for SAAGs comes from the state agencies that use them, not the Law Department, although the costs are administered by and reflected in the Law Department's budget. In most cases, the state is paying SAAGs at below market value.
Dale “Bubba” Samuels, for example, says he charges a reduced rate of $200 an hour for his SAAG work, which is spread among the four lawyers and paralegal in his Buford firm. Samuels is one of three SAAGs who brought in more than $1 million from the state last fiscal year through a caseload that supported the Georgia Department of Transportation and included title work, as well as condemnation litigation.
Jeff Gaba, working closely with his partner Richard Calhoun, also earned more than $1 million in SAAG work last fiscal year. Like Samuels, much of his caseload supported the Georgia Department of Transportation.
Between June 2017 and June 2018, the pair of lawyers say they had nine active GDOT projects, as well as 45 to 50 condemnation cases, six of which went to trial.
“We do quite a bit for the state, and they're very, very large projects,” Gaba said. “Because we have five lawyers and three paralegals [doing the work] we can handle the very big projects.”
Added Calhoun, who handles the condemnation litigation: “I don't know what the other SAAGs are doing, but five or six trials in one year is a pretty busy schedule.”
In addition to the GDOT work, Gaba's caseload supported the Georgia Lottery Corp., Department of Natural Resources and Board of Regents, the AG spokesperson said.
The final SAAG to earn more than $1 million last fiscal year is Craig Primis, the Washington, D.C.-based Kirkland & Ellis partner who represented Georgia in the water wars. Primis could not be reached for comment about his SAAG work and fees.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGeorgia's Governor Details Spending Plans but Not His Top Priority of Lawsuit Reform
6 minute readFourth Circuit Seeks More Legal Briefs in Unresolved N.C. Supreme Court Election
4 minute readFulton DA Seeks to Overturn Her Disqualification From Trump Georgia Election Case
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Am Law 200 Firms Announce Wave of D.C. Hires in White-Collar, Antitrust, Litigation Practices
- 2K&L Gates Files String of Suits Against Electronics Manufacturer's Competitors, Brightness Misrepresentations
- 3'Better of the Split': District Judge Weighs Circuit Divide in Considering Who Pays Decades-Old Medical Bill
- 4Which Georgia Courts Are Closed Today?—Here's a List
- 5After DEI Rollbacks, Employment Lawyers See Potential For Targeting Corporate Commitment to Equality
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250