Auto-Pedestrian Accident Case Yields Verdict & Cultural Lesson for Defense Lawyer
Defense attorney Lee Welborn said the jury, which included eight members from Latin America, relied on their experiences with home-country drivers to decide the plaintiff should have been more alert.
August 10, 2018 at 03:57 PM
4 minute read
After a Gwinnett County jury found no liability on the part of a motorist who struck a woman in a crosswalk, the defense attorney said that—in addition to a welcome verdict—he got a cultural lesson.
Key to G. Lee Welborn of Downey & Cleveland's case were arguments that the plaintiff looked left and right then stepped off the curb. Eight of the jurors were citizens who were originally from Latin American countries, he said.
“I was talking with them, and the man who sort of spoke for them said, 'When we go home and are crossing the street, our heads are going back and forth and we run across the street because of the way people drive there,'” Welborn said.
“As soon as they heard her say she only looked left once, they decided she was negligent,” he said.
“It never occurred to me what it must be like to be a pedestrian in the home countries of prospective jurors, but it's something I'll keep in mind in the future,” Welborn added.
Plaintiff Kimberly DeMars is represented by Grant Morain of Morain & Buckelew and Stephen Carlson of The Fry Law Firm. They said they did not speak to the jurors and did not hear the comments.
Morain noted, however, that the jury form indicated there was no contributory negligence on DeMars' part.
The lawyer said their client has not decided whether to seek an appeal or otherwise challenge the verdict.
“We're still talking to her about that,” Morain said.
According to the lawyers and court filings, Kimberly DeMars, now 35, was crossing Ponce de Leon Avenue in Decatur in 2013 en route to her yoga class. She was barely into the crosswalk when she was struck by a Chevrolet Sonic driven by Rachel Weber.
“She said she pushed the button for the 'walk' sign, looked left and didn't see anything, saw a car in the distance to the right and started across the street,” said Welborn. “My client said she had a solid green light. She admitted there were several 'Watch for Pedestrian' signs around.”
DeMars suffered a fractured left wrist and broken big toe and had no recollection of the crash, her lawyers said.
DeMars underwent surgery to implant a plate and screws in her wrist and accrued about $114,000 in medical bills, he said. DeMars, an architect, also had about $10,000 in lost wages claims.
Investigating officers did not cite either party, they said.
DeMars sued Weber in Gwinnett County State Court in 2015.
During a three-day trial before Judge Carla Brown, the lawyers said the key plaintiff's expert was DeMars' surgeon, Eric Furie of Buckhead Sports Medicine.
The defense presented testimony by accident reconstructionist Scott Short with Gainesville's Collision Specialists Inc.
“We made a conscious decision not to call an accident reconstructionist, because we just didn't think they really provided any value,” Morain said.
At closing, the plaintiff's lawyers asked the jury to award $615,000, the lawyers said.
The jury returned a defense verdict on Aug. 1.
DeMars lawyers said she was “an outstanding client and made a great appearance on the stand.”
“But, obviously, Lee Welborn is an experienced trial lawyer, and he tried a great case,” Morain said.
In addition to his cultural lesson concerning nonnative jurors' perceptions of being a pedestrian in the United states, Welborn said he gleaned another tip from the trial.
“I was reminded that I need to prepare my defendants for X-rays of broken bones and closeups of bones and screws,” he said. “This was jury trial 118 for me and I'm immune to it, but my poor young lady client had never seen anything like that. She had to bolt for the bathroom.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllOn the Move: Hunton Andrews Kurth Practice Leader Named Charlotte Managing Partner
6 minute readPaul Weiss’ Shanmugam Joins 11th Circuit Fight Over False Claims Act’s Constitutionality
Atlanta Attorneys Rely on Google Earth, YouTube for Evidence in $6M Faulty Guardrail Settlement
Trending Stories
- 1Litigation Leaders: Greenspoon Marder’s Beth-Ann Krimsky on What Makes Her Team ‘Prepared, Compassionate and Wicked Smart’
- 2A Look Back at High-Profile Hires in Big Law From Federal Government
- 3Grabbing Market Share From Rivals, Law Firms Ramped Up Group Lateral Hires
- 4Navigating Twitter's 'Rocky Deal Process' Helped Drive Simpson Thacher's Tech and Telecom Practice
- 5Public Notices/Calendars
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250