Judge Nixes Tea Party Activist's Appeal of $30K Ethics Panel Fine
Carolyn Cosby was fined last year after the Government Transparency & Campaign Finance Commission received complaints that a half-dozen groups she led failed to register prior to engaging in lobbying, accepting contributions or expending funds for political advocacy.
August 16, 2018 at 11:53 AM
3 minute read
A Fulton County judge has rejected a tea party activist's bid to dodge $30,000 in fines levied by Georgia's ethics agency, which determined that four organizations she founded between 2011 and 2014 raised money and engaged in political advocacy without registering with the state.
Cherokee County activist Carolyn Cosby was hit the fines last year after the state Government Transparency & Campaign Finance Commission received complaints that a half-dozen groups she led—Canton Tea Party Patriots, the Citizens Review and Recommendations Committee, the Canton T.E.A. Party, Expose Bobo Boondoggle Now, Citizens Opposed to Spiraling Taxation and Georgians for Health Care Freedom—failed to register prior to engaging in lobbying, accepting contributions or expending funds for political advocacy.
After multiple hearings, the commission determined there were reasonable grounds to believe each group had violated the state's campaign finance and disclosure law, and the state Law Department filed six cases with the Office of State Administrative Hearings, which consolidated them.
In 2017, an administrative law judge declined Cosby's motion to dismiss the cases and found that four of the groups had failed to register and file the required disclosure forms before engaging in political advocacy
Cosby, as “the owner, leader, and chairman of these independent committees,” was fined $30,000.
Cosby filed a petition for judicial review last year with the Fulton County Superior Court, arguing the commission's finding was both erroneous and a violation of her First Amendment guarantee of free speech. Cosby also argued that the commission's findings were arbitrary and capricious.
The office of Attorney General Chris Carr argued that the record clearly indicates the groups' actions violated the law, and that “it is well settled that requiring registration and disclosure of expenditures on express political advocacy does not violate the First Amendment.”
After hearing oral arguments, Judge Jane Barwick issued a two-sentence ruling on July 30 denying Cosby's appeal.
Cosby's attorney, Athens solo Stephen Humphreys, filed a motion for reconsideration last week.
“Under the law, Judge Barwick is the first judge hearing the case who has the authority to consider the First Amendment issues we raised, and her order completely ignored those constitutional issues,” he said.
The ethics commission's actions in levying the fines—far larger than those customarily assessed by the agency—defy logic, Humphreys said.
“They ran up these huge fines against Carolyn by saying she had more than one group, and the administrative law judge treated her as a multiple, repeat offender,” he said. “But this is the first time any of this has been adjudicated, and nobody has addressed any of that.”
A spokeswoman for Carr's office declined to comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Paragraph V Displaced Lathrop': High Court Mulls Sovereign Immunity Waiver Disputes
7 minute read11th Circuit Revives Project Veritas' Defamation Lawsuit Against CNN
State Appeals Court 'Reluctantly' Remands $1.7B Punitive Damages, Sanctions Against Ford for Fatal Rollover
High Court to Weigh If Amended Complaints Establish Sovereign Immunity Waiver
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1The Key Moves in the Reshuffling German Legal Market as 2025 Dawns
- 2Social Media Celebrities Clash in $100M Lawsuit
- 3Federal Judge Sets 2026 Admiralty Bench Trial in Baltimore Bridge Collapse Litigation
- 4Trump Media Accuses Purchaser Rep of Extortion, Harassment After Merger
- 5Judge Slashes $2M in Punitive Damages in Sober-Living Harassment Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250