Judge Nixes Tea Party Activist's Appeal of $30K Ethics Panel Fine
Carolyn Cosby was fined last year after the Government Transparency & Campaign Finance Commission received complaints that a half-dozen groups she led failed to register prior to engaging in lobbying, accepting contributions or expending funds for political advocacy.
August 16, 2018 at 11:53 AM
3 minute read
A Fulton County judge has rejected a tea party activist's bid to dodge $30,000 in fines levied by Georgia's ethics agency, which determined that four organizations she founded between 2011 and 2014 raised money and engaged in political advocacy without registering with the state.
Cherokee County activist Carolyn Cosby was hit the fines last year after the state Government Transparency & Campaign Finance Commission received complaints that a half-dozen groups she led—Canton Tea Party Patriots, the Citizens Review and Recommendations Committee, the Canton T.E.A. Party, Expose Bobo Boondoggle Now, Citizens Opposed to Spiraling Taxation and Georgians for Health Care Freedom—failed to register prior to engaging in lobbying, accepting contributions or expending funds for political advocacy.
After multiple hearings, the commission determined there were reasonable grounds to believe each group had violated the state's campaign finance and disclosure law, and the state Law Department filed six cases with the Office of State Administrative Hearings, which consolidated them.
In 2017, an administrative law judge declined Cosby's motion to dismiss the cases and found that four of the groups had failed to register and file the required disclosure forms before engaging in political advocacy
Cosby, as “the owner, leader, and chairman of these independent committees,” was fined $30,000.
Cosby filed a petition for judicial review last year with the Fulton County Superior Court, arguing the commission's finding was both erroneous and a violation of her First Amendment guarantee of free speech. Cosby also argued that the commission's findings were arbitrary and capricious.
The office of Attorney General Chris Carr argued that the record clearly indicates the groups' actions violated the law, and that “it is well settled that requiring registration and disclosure of expenditures on express political advocacy does not violate the First Amendment.”
After hearing oral arguments, Judge Jane Barwick issued a two-sentence ruling on July 30 denying Cosby's appeal.
Cosby's attorney, Athens solo Stephen Humphreys, filed a motion for reconsideration last week.
“Under the law, Judge Barwick is the first judge hearing the case who has the authority to consider the First Amendment issues we raised, and her order completely ignored those constitutional issues,” he said.
The ethics commission's actions in levying the fines—far larger than those customarily assessed by the agency—defy logic, Humphreys said.
“They ran up these huge fines against Carolyn by saying she had more than one group, and the administrative law judge treated her as a multiple, repeat offender,” he said. “But this is the first time any of this has been adjudicated, and nobody has addressed any of that.”
A spokeswoman for Carr's office declined to comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSanctions Order Over Toyota's Failure to Provide English Translations of Documents Vacated by Appeals Court
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Veritext Legal Solutions Announces the Past Acquisitions of Three Alternative Dispute Resolution Firms
- 2Sarno da Costa D’Aniello Maceri LLC Announces Addition of New Office in Eatontown, NJ, and Named Partner
- 3LSU General Counsel Quits Amid Fracas Over First Amendment Rights of Law Professor
- 4An Eye on ‘De-Risking’: Chewing on Hot Topics in Litigation Funding With Jeffery Lula of GLS Capital
- 5Arguing Class Actions: With Friends Like These...
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250