High Court Upholds Life Without Parole for Murder of Judge, Rejects Defendant's Life Support Argument
The sole argument on appeal was that the victim might have survived had life support not been withdrawn. The Georgia Supreme Court justices disagreed.
August 21, 2018 at 02:15 PM
4 minute read
The Georgia Supreme Court turned down a novel defense theory Monday and unanimously upheld the malice murder conviction and life-without-parole prison sentence for the murder of a Jesup municipal court judge and longtime district attorney of the Brunswick Judicial Circuit.
“Bobby Rex Stribling, Jr. appeals his convictions for malice murder and other crimes arising from the fatal beating of William Glenn Thomas, Jr.,” Justice Nels Peterson wrote. “Thomas was placed in a medically induced coma and on a ventilator as a result of the beating, but was taken off the ventilator when his condition failed to improve. On appeal, Stribling's sole argument is that the evidence was insufficient to convict him, because there was evidence that Thomas might have survived had life support not been withdrawn.”
Stribling's attorney, Richard O. Allen of Atlantic Beach, Florida, asserted that the withdrawal of life support was the “intervening and ultimate cause of Thomas's death.”
Allen did not return calls for comment. Neither did Brunswick Judicial Circuit District Attorney Jackie Johnson.
Despite the defense, Peterson, affirming the court below, said “the trial evidence authorized the jury to conclude that Thomas did not have a realistic chance of survival and that Stribling's actions were the proximate cause of Thomas's death.”
Although neither side requested it, the court did vacate several sentences on convictions that should have merged. Still, Stribling is subject to life behind bars without parole.
Thomas had lunch with his two daughters on June 25, 2007, then returned to his office and met with a client, Peterson said. The client would later report to police that he saw a man outside the office before he went in, and again when he left. The man, later identified as Stribling, asked “whether anyone else was inside the building,” and the client “replied that Thomas was alone,” according to the court.
“Sometime later, George Cappleman, who shared the office building with Thomas, arrived at the building,” Peterson continued. “When Capplemen entered the office, he saw Thomas sitting at his desk, bleeding from his head with a large bruise under his left eye. Thomas was talking, but was very confused. Cappleman called 911.”
Thomas was hospitalized locally with swelling of the brain and later airlifted to Savannah, but his condition never improved. After two weeks, Thomas's family was told he was brain dead, and would develop pneumonia. The family directed doctors to remove him from the ventilator, soon after which he died, on July 9, 2007, the court said.
“An autopsy revealed that Thomas had suffered at least 15 separate blows resulting in 38 different injuries, including a fractured skull. The cause of death was identified as multiple blunt force injuries,” Peterson wrote.
On July 20, 2007, a Wayne County grand jury indicted Stribling. After he was arrested, he confessed to going to see Thomas, his former lawyer, to ask for money. He said he “snapped,” then hit Thomas with an object from the desk and stole $1,000 and the keys to a truck, Peterson said.
The charges were: malice murder, aggravated battery, aggravated assault with intent to rob, armed robbery, burglary and theft by taking. The trial started Aug. 16, 2010, and lasted until that Sept. 4. The jury found Stribling guilty of all charges. The trial court sentenced Stribling to life without parole for malice murder, consecutive 20-year terms for aggravated battery and aggravated assault, a consecutive life sentence for armed robbery, a 20-year term for burglary consecutive to the armed robbery sentence and a consecutive 10-year term for theft by taking, Peterson said.
“There is no evidence that the aggravated battery occurred independently from the act that caused Thomas's death, and so this count should have merged with the malice murder conviction,” Peterson said. “And the aggravated assault with intent to rob should have merged with armed robbery.” So the court vacated those two sentences.
But the one argument the defense did make didn't sway the court.
“Stribling argues that the medical examiner's testimony established the possibility that Thomas could have survived had life support continued, although perhaps not with the same quality of life, and that the removal of Thomas from life support was the intervening and ultimate cause of his death,” Peterson said. “We disagree.”
The case is Stribling v. State, No. S18A0595.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Fulfilled Her Purpose on the Court': Presiding Judge M. Yvette Miller Is 'Ready for a New Challenge'
8 minute readOn the Move: Hunton Andrews Kurth Practice Leader Named Charlotte Managing Partner
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Judge Reduces $287M Jury Verdict Against Harley-Davidson in Wrongful Death Suit
- 2Kirkland to Covington: 2024's International Chart Toppers and Award Winners
- 3Decision of the Day: Judge Denies Summary Judgment Motions in Suit by Runner Injured in Brooklyn Bridge Park
- 4KISS, Profit Motive and Foreign Currency Contracts
- 512 Days of … Web Analytics
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250