Federal Lawsuit: Stockbridge Claims Creating City of Eagle's Landing Violates Voter Rights, Bond Credibility
Lawyers for the city of Stockbridge, Georgia, claim in a federal lawsuit that a plan to carve off parts of the city to form a new, wealthier, whiter…
August 22, 2018 at 01:58 PM
3 minute read
Lawyers for the city of Stockbridge, Georgia, claim in a federal lawsuit that a plan to carve off parts of the city to form a new, wealthier, whiter city impairs its citizens' right to vote and harms the city's ability to pay municipal bond obligations.
The lawsuit was filed Monday against the state of Georgia, Gov. Nathan Deal and other state officials. It comes just days after Capital One Public Funding—one of the nation's largest issuers of municipal bonds—filed a similar lawsuit seeking to stop the referendum to create the new city of Eagles Landing from moving forward as planned in November.
Deal signed legislation in May allowing for the creation of Eagle's Landing, in part from land currently in Stockbridge. The new city's formation must first be approved by local voters, and a referendum is planned for November's midterm elections. Stockbridge residents outside the proposed new city won't get a vote.
If created, Eagle's Landing would take approximately one-third of Stockbridge's residents and about half of its tax revenue.
Christopher Anulewicz, an attorney representing Stockbridge, said the city's lawsuit centers on three claims. “Two of them deal with voting rights, one of them deals with the right to have integrity in our contracts,” he said.
Anulewicz said the creation of Eagle's Landing would bring African-American voters from a majority voting bloc in Stockbridge to a minority position in the new city and would hurt the city's obligation to pay bond debts taken out in 2005 and 2006, thereby harming an existing contract between the city and its lenders.
A Henry County Superior Court judge in July declined to issue an injunction stopping the vote from proceeding. The city is appealing the ruling.
Vikki Consiglio, chairman of the committee for the city of Eagle's Landing, dismissed the lawsuits and said that proponents were pushing forward to the vote in November.
“Anybody can file a lawsuit for anything,” Consiglio said. “A lawsuit has already been filed, and the courts have ruled in our favor.”
“This is all about the vote and them trying to do everything they can to stop the vote,” she said. The lawsuit filed by Capital One Public Funding, says the company currently holds $11.75 million of bonds from Stockbridge, which mature in 2031. It says that the creation of Eagle's Landing will shrink Stockbridge's tax revenue by half, thereby “severely reducing” the “collateral that was contractually promised and pledged to (Capital One Public Funding).”
It follows a report issued by Moody's Investor Service in May that said the creation of Eagle's Landing would be “credit negative for local governments in Georgia generally because they establish a precedent that the state can act to divide local tax bases, potentially lowering the credit quality of one city for the benefit of another.”
Residents pushing for the new city say they are driven by a desire to secure better city services, increase property values and attract high-end businesses. But opponents of Eagle's Landing, including several elected officials from the area, say race is a factor.
Stockbridge, about 20 miles southeast of Atlanta, is predominantly black, while the proposed city of Eagle's Landing would have a higher proportion of white residents.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTransgender Care Fight Targets More Adults as Georgia, Other States Weigh Laws
Georgia Republicans Push to Limit Lawsuits. But Would That Keep Insurance Rates From Rising?
5 minute readA Plan Is Brewing to Limit Big-Dollar Suits in Georgia—and Lawyers Have Mixed Feelings
10 minute readTrending Stories
- 1DeepSeek Isn’t Yet Impacting Legal Tech Development. But That Could Soon Change.
- 2'Landmark' New York Commission Set to Study Overburdened, Under-Resourced Family Courts
- 3Wave of Commercial Real Estate Refinance Could Drown Property Owners
- 4Redeveloping Real Estate After Natural Disasters: Challenges, Strategies and Opportunities
- 5Calif. Fires Should Serve as a Reminder to Fla.’s Commercial Landlords and Tenants Not to Be Complacent
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250