Climbing the Financial Ladder: Women GCs Transform the Legal Landscape
The pay gap is smaller at managing counsel and senior counsel levels—where women receive 90 percent and 89 percent of their male colleagues' compensation, respectively.
August 29, 2018 at 03:20 PM
5 minute read
Corporate Counsel's 2018 General Counsel Compensation Survey provides insight into trends and growth areas for the legal market as a whole. In addition to showing a rise in compensation for top lawyers in middle market companies and the dominance of the finance and entertainment industries, the survey also highlights another issue across the legal industry—fewer women in high-level roles and a persistent pay gap. However, the raw numbers belie some positive trends as women progress through the corporate legal ranks.
Among the 100 most highly compensated GCs surveyed by Corporate Counsel, 23 are women. The Top 10 for 2018 has only one—Laureen Seeger of American Express. In addition, executive search firm BarkerGilmore's 2018 In-House Counsel Compensation Report showed that women GCs make about 78 percent of the average total compensation that their male counterparts receive.
But there are signs of change. The pay gap is smaller at managing counsel and senior counsel levels—where women receive 90 percent and 89 percent of their male colleagues' compensation, respectively. And BarkerGilmore notes that annual salaries are increasing at a higher rate for female GCs.
Although the process is slow, the pay gap will likely continue decreasing as more women rise through the ranks as both in-house and law firm attorneys. Considering that between 1947 and 2018 the percentages of female law school students increased from 3.3 percent to 48.7 percent, there is no reason to believe this forward progress will not continue.
In addition, the women topping the ranks of Corporate Counsel's survey in recent years are standout. One departing female GC—Denise Keane, who retired in 2017 after 40 years with Altria Group Inc.—received a hefty retirement package that has been cited as an explanation for why the average total cash compensation for the 100 highest-paid GCs decreased by 4.2 percent from 2017 to 2018.
Further, although Seeger is the only woman in the 2018 Top 10, she moved up a spot from last year to be second on the list with $6.7 million in compensation (just behind Morgan Stanley's Eric Grossman, with $6.9 million). Seeger oversees American Express' 200-lawyer legal department, comprised of 57 percent women.
Now that Seeger has reached the highest echelons of in-house attorneys, she is working hard to close the pay gap and support women and minorities. In an interview with Corporate Counsel earlier this year, Seeger said she prioritizes diversity not only on her team, but also in the outside law firms she retains:
“When we've had a new case, if the firm wasn't diverse enough, we haven't selected them to represent us on that new matter. … The only way we'll know we've succeeded and other companies have succeeded is when we start seeing more women partners as a percentage and more people of color as a percentage in the law firms that we hire.”
And there may be more diverse firms to choose from than ever before. Diversity Lab recently released its first group of law firms certified under the Mansfield Rule. The Mansfield certification means law firms affirmatively considered women and lawyers of color—at least 30 percent of the candidate pool—for leadership and governance roles, equity partner promotions and senior lateral positions. Diversity Lab says the goal of the rule is to boost the representation of diverse lawyers in law firm leadership by broadening the pool of candidates considered for these opportunities. Forty-one firms earned Mansfield certification. Twenty-seven are certified as Mansfield “Plus,” which means at least 30 percent of leadership positions are now held by women and diverse attorneys.
And GCs are taking notice, said Diversity Lab's Lisa Kirby. “It seems like every few weeks we hear of another legal department that has started asking outside counsel in their RFPs whether they are participating in the Mansfield Rule or are Mansfield Certified,” Kirby said via email. “Some GCs have even told their firms that they must become Mansfield Certified or lose their spot as preferred providers. I think GCs see participation in the Mansfield Rule as a way to help identify firms that are truly committed to taking action to improve their pipelines and broaden their thinking.”
Whether the law firm leaders become GCs or work for GCs, this measure could both increase opportunities for lawyers of all backgrounds and create a positive financial impact for law firms.
Meredith Whigham Caiafa is of counsel in Morris, Manning & Martin's Employment, Benefits & Executive Compensation practice group. This article is for informational purposes only and is not intended to constitute legal advice.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBusiness Breakups: Why Business and Commercial Cases Are Well-Suited to Mediation
5 minute readIn RE: Hair Relaxer Marketing, Sales Practices and Products Liability Litigation
Trending Stories
- 1Saying Your Goodbyes—Ethical Obligations When Transitioning to a New Firm
- 2Woman's Suit Alleging Negligence to Sex Trafficking by Hotel Tossed by Federal Judge
- 3Dog Gone It, Target: Provider of Retailer's Mascot Dog Sues Over Contract Cancellation
- 4Lululemon Faces Legal Fire Over Its DEI Program After Bias Complaints Surface
- 5Plaintiff Gets $500K Policy Limit Without Surgery
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250