Judge Levies $260K in Fees Against Company That Fought Arbitration Award
An Israeli company that was found to have defamed its onetime Georgia partner challenged that ruling in federal court, only to have the international arbitration award upheld and to be hit with more than $260,000 in attorney fees.
August 30, 2018 at 02:59 PM
4 minute read
A federal judge awarded more than $260,000 in legal fees to a Georgia company that had already won nearly $900,000 after an Israeli business partner lost an arbitration battle and a subsequent court challenge to that decision.
The earlier award itself included nearly $235,000 in fees for OA Development Inc. and its lawyers, Simon Bloom and Troy Covington of what is now the Bloom Parham firm.
The order issued Aug. 23 by Judge Eleanor Ross of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia gave the Israeli company, Bamberger-Rosenheim, 30 days to pay $261,000 in fees to OAD.
Bloom said the order was a victory for the arbitration process and that the challenge should never have been filed.
“I have said from the very beginning that Bamberger's strategy of re-litigating and incessantly appealing a final arbitration award, confirmed by the U.S. district court, flies in the face of the essence of alternative dispute resolution,” Bloom said via email.
“The jurisprudence on arbitration is designed to pay heightened deference to arbitrators faithfully executing their job,” he said.
“What is the point of choosing a forum like the [International Court of Arbitration] if the two year process to get to a supposed 'final award' is anything but,” Bloom said.
Bamberger is represented by Greg Hecht and Jon Jordan of Hecht Walker.
In an email, Jordan said they respect Ross, but do not agree with her ruling.
“In regard to the appeal itself, our client wanted this jurisdictional issue to go to the U.S. Supreme Court in relation to forum selection clauses in international commercial contracts,” Jordan said.
In their view, the arbitration forum selection portion of the underlying agreement “specified that the forum for OAD's claims in arbitration should be in Israel, our client's home country.”
“There was a conflict in circuits on this exact forum selection issue, and Profimex hoped the U.S. Supreme Court would take up this issue to clarify the dispute,” he said.
A Bamberger subsidiary, Profimex, had partnered with OAD several years ago on several development projects, but in 2014 the Israeli company filed a breach of contract complaint against Norcross-based OAD over the division of proceeds from the sale of one of the properties.
OAD counterclaimed, charging Profimex with defamation for telling investors it was dishonest and circulating emails decrying OAD as “crooks in Atlanta,” among other things.
As per their contract, the case was sent to mediation in Georgia as the venue of the nonfiling party, and both parties were awarded damages. But Profimex filed a lawsuit to void the award against it, arguing that their 2008 contract mandated any dispute be arbitrated in the challenged company's chosen venue and that OED's counterclaims should have been arbitrated in Tel Aviv instead of Atlanta.
In 2016, Ross sided with OED, confirming the arbitrator's award and ordering Profimex to pay $469,697 in general damages; $187,879 in punitive damages and $234,848 in attorney fees.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit upheld Ross' order last year, and the U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear Profimex's appeal.
OED filed for fees related to the appeals litigation, and Ross' recent order granting them makes clear that they are not a sanction.
Rather, she wrote, they are proper under indemnification provisions of the contract between the parties, if one were found to have violated the law.
“[Bamberger's] challenge of the arbitration award in this court arises from, relates to, and otherwise is connected with [its] violation of New York law by defaming [OED],” Ross wrote.
Bloom said the recovery of “nearly every penny of attorneys fees spent on this case from its inception is very, very gratifying for a litigator. And more importantly, it is vindication for our clients that have stayed the course from the beginning.”
Jordan said the case reflects “hands-off” approach to domestic arbitration that is being applied to international arbitration decisions that “will only diminish the willingness of international businesses to enter into arbitration agreements with U.S. counter-parties.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllOn the Move: Hunton Andrews Kurth Practice Leader Named Charlotte Managing Partner
6 minute readPaul Weiss’ Shanmugam Joins 11th Circuit Fight Over False Claims Act’s Constitutionality
Atlanta Attorneys Rely on Google Earth, YouTube for Evidence in $6M Faulty Guardrail Settlement
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250