New Chief Justice Melton Leads Younger Generation of Judges
The new chief justice who will be sworn in Tuesday, Harold Melton, is 23 years younger than his predecessor. Chief Justice P. Harris Hines will turn 75 in September. Melton will turn 52.
August 31, 2018 at 10:05 AM
4 minute read
The last time the Georgia Supreme Court changed its chief justice, the departing one and the incoming one were the same age. Chief Justice Hugh Thompson was 73 when he retired, the same age as Chief Justice P. Harris Hines when he took on the role in January 2017.
The new chief justice who will be sworn in Tuesday, Harold Melton, is 23 years younger than his predecessor. Hines will turn 75 in September; Melton will turn 52.
Melton didn't make much of the generational transition as he was packing up to change offices. “It just means I have a better jump shot,” he joked.
“It is a difference that our court will adjust to,” Melton said. “There's a certain energy to try things a different way, maybe a greater utilization of technology.”
The younger justices all have families with young children, he noted. “There's more of a desire to be at home and balance travel and outside events,” Melton said. “But we are still very much an interactive court. We still feel like we need to be together.”
Hines will administer the oath of office to Melton as chief and David Nahmias as presiding justice in a ceremony at 11 a.m. Tuesday in the House of Representatives chamber of the state Capitol.
Melton and Hines have known each other since Melton was student senate president at Auburn University and Hines was a Cobb County Superior Court judge. Hines recalled that his wife, who is from Alabama, read a newspaper article about Melton and his interest in the law. She urged her husband to call Melton and offer him a summer internship. “He had a better gig—working for the governor of Alabama. But he was available the next summer,” Hines recalled of Melton. “I don't know if he's like my youngest brother or my oldest son, but he's a great guy, and I love him dearly.”
Melton, a former assistant attorney general and governor's executive counsel, was 39 when then-Gov. Sonny Perdue appointed him to the high court, in 2005. Within a few years, Melton was joined by Nahmias, who is one year older, and Justice Keith Blackwell, who was 36 when he was appointed in 2012.
Gov. Nathan Deal, who appointed Blackwell, acknowledged a conscious shift to younger judges “so they can serve longer and give the courts greater stability.”
At the same time Hines became chief and Melton became presiding justice in January 2017, they were joined by three more junior justices, only one of whom is older than Melton—and not by much. Justice Michael Boggs moved up from the Court of Appeals at 55. Deal, who appointed all three, swore in Boggs first to replace retiring Chief Justice Hugh Thompson, then the other two to fill newly created positions: Justice Nels Peterson, former Court of Appeals judge, and Justice Britt Grant, former solicitor general, who both were 38 when they went on the court.
When Grant left last month to become a judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, Deal replaced her with another 36-year-old: Solicitor General Sarah Warren.
Melton has shown the ability to reach across any generational divide. His name came up as a mentor in an interview with the Judicial Nominating Commission. Court of Appeals Judge Clyde Reese said, when the members asked him for a judicial hero, he named Melton.
“He was at the attorney general's office when I started,” said Reese, who is seven years older than Melton. “He was an adviser and a mentor to me.”
Melton said the investiture Tuesday will simply be a time for gratitude and celebration.
“The obvious main theme is a thank you for support in personal life and professional life,” Melton said. “It's a chance to say thanks for all the people involved in making the judiciary as cohesive an operation as it is and continues to be.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'A 58-Year-Old Engine That Needs an Overhaul': Judge Wants Traffic Law Amended
3 minute readAppeals Court Removes Fulton DA From Georgia Election Case Against Trump, Others
4 minute readGlynn County Judge Rejects Ex-DA's Motion to Halt Her Misconduct Trial in Ahmaud Arbery Investigation
Trending Stories
- 1Feds Chide Defense Attorney Alex Spiro for Extrajudicial Comments in NYC's Adams Case
- 2These Law Firm Leaders Are Optimistic About 2025, Citing Deal Pipeline, International Business
- 3‘A Force of Nature’: Littler Mendelson Shareholder Michael Lotito Dies At 76
- 4'Serious Disruptions'?: Federal Courts Brace for Government Shutdown Threat
- 5Energy Lawyers Working in Texas Expect Strong Demand to Continue in 2025 Across Energy Sector
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250