Federal Judge to Hear Arguments Over Nov. 6 Paper Ballot Proposal
U.S. District Judge Amy Totenberg will hear from academics, cybersecurity experts and public officials during an all-day hearing over whether the state should use paper ballots during the midterm elections.
September 11, 2018 at 04:56 PM
5 minute read
Armed with a new report warning officials across the nation to forego electronic voting in the November midterm elections, Georgia voters are urging a federal judge in Atlanta to order the state to institute paper ballots.
Judge Amy Totenberg of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia is slated to hold an all-day hearing Wednesday before deciding whether to order a preliminary injunction mandating the conversion to paper ballots before Nov. 6.
Last week, attorneys representing plaintiff voters and a national Colorado-based coalition urging a return to paper ballots proposed an order that would prohibit Georgia Secretary of State and Republican gubernatorial candidate Brian Kemp, the State Board of Elections and 159 county election boards from using Georgia's antiquated electronic voting machines for the upcoming election.
The proposed order, if Totenberg signs it, also would direct Kemp to tell county election officials to use paper ballots in the fall and would require the secretary of state and the board to implement rules and procedures for manual audits of the election results before they are certified.
A preliminary witness list suggests the seven-hour hearing will include competing testimony by a roster of academic and cybersecurity experts and public officials. Kemp's counsel contends that converting to paper ballots is not feasible before November and would likely throw the midterm election into chaos.
Counsel for the plaintiff voters and the Coalition for Good Governance include a team of attorneys from Morrison & Foerster in Washington, D.C., led by partner David Cross; Bruce Brown, who represented the state of Georgia for nearly 15 years in the ongoing water wars litigation; Cary Ichter of Ichter Davis; and Seattle attorney Robert McGuire.
Former Democratic Gov. Roy Barnes and law partner John Salter Jr. are defending Kemp and the state elections board.
They have enlisted former Secretary of State Cathy Cox, now dean of Mercer University's School of Law, as a witness to testify about the “infeasibility” of returning to widespread paper ballot voting before early voting begins next month.
Following the chaos of the 2000 presidential ballot count in Florida, Cox ordered an overhaul of Georgia's voting systems and introduced the Diebold Election Systems electronic touchscreen voting machines that are still in use today.
Totenberg has called the proposed paper ballot injunction “a pressing challenge,” but “no small request.” Prior to the hearing, the judge sought more information about the possible effects of an injunction and whether it would “adversely impact the public interest” by compromising the election's integrity and the ability of the state to successfully carry it off.
In the federal lawsuit filed last year, the plaintiff voters and the coalition warned that the state's voting infrastructure has already been compromised and that, absent a return to paper ballots, the legitimacy of the November election results will be cast into doubt.
Citing alarms raised by national security officials this summer, they contend Georgia's election infrastructure was targeted by hackers working for Russian intelligence operatives. According to an affidavit filed with the injunction motion, at least three cybersecurity experts discovered Kennesaw State University's Center for Election Systems failed to secure from public access confidential data for more than five million voters, election software applications, encryption keys, passwords for voting equipment and administration, ballot proofs, tabulation and memory card programming databases for past and future elections, and other sensitive information intended for exclusive use by county election officials across the state.
KSU's contract with the secretary of state to house the data and make it available to county election officials was terminated last year. Kemp's spokeswoman has repeatedly said the state elections infrastructure and voting equipment “remain secure” and that no evidence has surfaced that data was manipulated in any way.
In addition to Cox, those expected to testify include:
- Richard DeMillo, a computer science professor at Georgia Tech. DeMillo submitted an affidavit last week highlighting “Securing the Vote,” a new report released Sept. 5 by the National Academies of Science, Engineering and Medicine spelling out the harm that malicious cyber actors can wreak on the nation's vulnerable election infrastructure. The report warned that, “Every effort should be made to use human-readable paper ballots in the 2018 federal election”—an assessment DeMillo concurs with.
- Michael Barnes, who headed the KSU elections center until last year. Barnes works for the state elections division.
- Alex Halderman, a computer science an engineering professor at the University of Michigan. In April, Halderman and The New York Times staged a mock election to demonstrate how the touchscreen voting machines in use in Georgia could be hacked to overturn an election.
- Chris Harvey, Kemp's state elections director. Harvey said in a declaration filed last month that switching to paper ballots “would require investments in equipment and supplies that are not currently available” and require new security protocols. He also predicted “a substantial risk of voter confusion, disruption, increased errors at polls, increased wait times, suppressed voter turnout, and potential disenfranchisement.”
- Rebecca Sullivan, general counsel at Georgia's Department of Administrative Services, which handles state purchasing contracts.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Fulfilled Her Purpose on the Court': Presiding Judge M. Yvette Miller Is 'Ready for a New Challenge'
8 minute readTrending Stories
- 1The Key Moves in the Reshuffling German Legal Market as 2025 Dawns
- 2Social Media Celebrities Clash in $100M Lawsuit
- 3Federal Judge Sets 2026 Admiralty Bench Trial in Baltimore Bridge Collapse Litigation
- 4Trump Media Accuses Purchaser Rep of Extortion, Harassment After Merger
- 5Judge Slashes $2M in Punitive Damages in Sober-Living Harassment Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250