Lawyer for Child Injured in Botched Circumcision Asks for $100M in Damages
Pope McGlamry partner C. Neal Pope said the 18 days prior to the flawed procedure are the only “normal days that child will have”
September 20, 2018 at 10:09 PM
3 minute read
The lead attorney for a child who lost the tip of his penis during a botched circumcision nearly five years ago asked jurors to award $100 million in damages as he finalized the plaintiffs' case Thursday afternoon.
Pope McGlamry partner C. Neal Pope said the boy, who will be 5 years old next month, will spend the rest of his life dealing with the effects of the incident that has already led to multiple surgeries and will leave him scarred mentally and physically for the rest of his life.
The boy was 18 days old when his mother, Stacie Willis, took him to Life Cycle OB/GYN for the procedure, during which a small piece of the tip of his penis was severed.
“Those 18 days were the only normal days that child will have” over a lifetime that should last another 70 years, Pope said.
“This whole thing was a screw-up from start to finish,” said Pope, after pointing to testimony that doctors might have been able to reattach the tissue if they had immediately sent him and the severed portion of the glans, or penis tip, to a hospital emergency room.
Instead, the tissue was placed in a refrigerator, and the boy's mother was told that a certain amount of bleeding was normal and that she should take the baby to see her treating pediatrician the next day.
Stacie Willis sued the nurse midwife who performed the procedure, Melissa Jones; the OB/GYN she consulted, Brian Register; Life Cycle OB/GYN; a related practice, Life Cycle Pediatrics; and the boy's treating pediatrician, Abigail Kamishlian; and Kamishlian's employer, Daffodil Pediatrics.
Clayton County State Court Judge Shalonda Jones-Parker sanctioned Jones and Register earlier this year, striking their defenses over the destruction of the severed tissue that remained in a refrigerator for several months before it was discarded. That means those two defendants are already deemed liable, and the trial against them is only for the amount of damages.
During closing arguments, attorneys for the three sets of co-defendants offered varying defenses.
Hall Booth partner Terrell “Chip” Benton, who represents Jones and Register, agreed that the boy should be compensated for his injuries but urged the jury to be “fair and reasonable.” He noted that the child's injuries—while genuine—have not interfered with his ability to urinate and are not likely to interfere with his ability to have children, though “cosmetic” surgery might be required in the future.
Huff Powell & Bailey partner R. Page Powell Jr., who represents Life Cycle Pediatrics owner Anne Sigouin, noted his client was not even on-site when the incident occurred and relied solely on what Register told her by phone shortly after it happened. Register assured her the situation was under control, Powell said, adding that jurors should not find Sigouin at fault.
Similarly, Peters & Monyak partner Robert Monyak said his client, Kamishlian—whom Jones called shortly after the incident—was being blamed for assuming Jones' account of slicing off a “sliver” of tissue was accurate.
“Their argument is that Dr. Kamishlian should have interrogated Ms. Jones,” said Monyak. “Why would she do that? It's common and rational for one professional to believe another professional.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllJustice Known for Asking 'Tough Questions' Resolves to Improve Civility
4 minute readAlston & Bird Adds M&A, Private Equity Team From McDermott in New York
4 minute readVeteran Federal Trade Law Enforcer Joins King & Spalding in Washington
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Pa. Superior Court: Sorority's Interview Notes Not Shielded From Discovery in Lawsuit Over Student's Death
- 2Kraken’s Chief Legal Officer Exits, Eyes Role in Trump Administration
- 3DOT Nominee Duffy Pledges Safety, Faster Infrastructure Spending in Confirmation Hearing
- 4'Younger and Invigorated Bench': Biden's Legacy in New Jersey Federal Court
- 5'Every Single Judge on Board': First-Impression Case Revived
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250