Childhood Sex Abuse Victims Still Face Statute of Limitations Hurdle
“I understand the general reasoning why you have a statute of limitations. You can't allow people to have the risk of litigation unendingly. That makes sense in many respects – except for the injury of childhood sexual abuse,” said Darren Penn of the Penn Law Group. “Most people don't disclose the abuse until they're 42. That's the average.”
September 21, 2018 at 05:22 PM
4 minute read
Despite widespread public outrage over child sexual abuse revealed by a grand jury investigation in Pennsylvania last month and a $27 million settlement paid in New York last week, overwhelming obstacles remain for most survivors to recover damages—mainly the statute of limitations.
“I understand the general reasoning why you have a statute of limitations. You can't allow people to have the risk of litigation unendingly. That makes sense in many respects—except for the injury of childhood sexual abuse,” said Darren Penn of the Penn Law Group. “Most people don't disclose the abuse until they're 42. That's the average.”
The statute of limitations in Georgia requires that survivors of childhood sex abuse file their lawsuits by the time they are 23. But most people don't disclose until mid-life for a number of reasons, Penn said. Sometimes the perpetrators threaten the victims or their family. More often, the children are too young to explain or they are too embarrassed or fearful. In many cases, survivors disclose only after their children reach the age they were when they were abused and they report flashbacks.
Penn has represented survivors and has several current lawsuits against educational and religious institutions and their employees. He is part of a group of lawyers and advocates who tried this year to persuade the Georgia General Assembly to reduce restrictions on such cases. They lost.
The Hidden Predator Act of 2018 would have built on an earlier version which opened a two-year window on the statute of limitations for adult survivors of childhood sexual abuse to file lawsuits. That window ended last year.
But even the lawsuits that were filed during that time led to little in recovery because the extension applied only to individual defendants, not institutions. Lobbyists and a majority of legislators this year argued that allowing entities such as schools, churches and scouting organizations to be sued would cause financial hardships. Institutions generally would offer the only potential for financial recovery—unless the individual just happens to have ample assets. Even a home owner or liability umbrella insurance policy would not pay in a circumstance where a crime is committed, Penn said.
So the statute of limitations becomes the key to potential recovery of damages. Penn said he believes states need to follow the example of Florida and a handful of others that had removed the statute of limitations entirely for adult survivors of childhood sex abuse.
Legislators in Pennsylvania have suggested removing or increasing the age of the statute of limitations after a grand jury report last month revealing that 300 priests had sexually abused 1000 children. After that, New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo spoke out in favor of lifting the statute of limitations on such claims there. More calls for removal of the limits follows a report last week that the Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn had agreed to pay a $27.5 million settlement to four people who had been abused by a church volunteer.
“There's no statute of limitations for murder,” Penn said. “Why should there be one for childhood sexual abuse?”
In a blog post on his firm website, Penn has said that professionals who work with survivors often compare childhood sexual abuse to murder because of what it does to the soul—and the future health—of the person. Survivors often experience the same kinds of harm over a lifetime: depression, suicide attempts, substance abuse, relationship issues.
“A lot of times you'll meet them, and they're just a wreck,” Penn said. But he's been encouraged to find survivors have been strengthened by their disclosures and their support of each other—aside from any recovery of damages.
“It's a wonderful thing to see,” Penn said. “They've always thought they were the only ones and kept it secret. When they find out they're not the only victim, they come together and form a bond. It's healing.”
So when the General Assembly convenes again in Atlanta, Penn and other lawyers and activists will be renewing their efforts to expand or remove the state of limitations for survivor litigation.
“We are committed to doing everything we can possibly do to get the law changed in Georgia,” Penn said. “We will stay on this until there is a law passed that makes sense.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllA Plan Is Brewing to Limit Big-Dollar Suits in Georgia—and Lawyers Have Mixed Feelings
10 minute readOn The Move: Kilpatrick Adds West Coast IP Pro, Partners In Six Cities Join Nelson Mullins, Freeman Mathis
6 minute readDid Ahmaud Arbery's Killers Get Help From Glynn County DA? Jury Hears Clashing Accounts
Trending Stories
- 1Law Firms Expand Scope of Immigration Expertise, Amid Blitz of Trump Orders
- 2Latest Boutique Combination in Florida Continues Am Law 200 Merger Activity
- 3Sarno da Costa D’Aniello Maceri LLC Announces Addition of New Office in Eatontown, NJ, and Named Partner
- 4Friday Newspaper
- 5Public Notices/Calendars
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250