'These Aren't Good Numbers,' Former Chief Justice Writes About Courts' Diversity
"Public confidence in our courts is stronger when the judiciary bears some broad resemblance to the community it serves, rather than an exclusive segment of it."
September 25, 2018 at 04:45 PM
3 minute read
Without criticizing any of the governor's appointments to the state appellate courts during his tenure, all of whom appear to be decent and honorable people, it's obvious from this article in the Daily Report that racial minorities and women have progressed little in the last few years. In fact, when Supreme Court Justice Carol Hunstein retires at the end of this year, the percentage of women on that court will drop to 11 percent (one out of nine justices). Even the United States Supreme Court, which now has three female judges on a bench of nine (33 percent), is more diverse in terms of gender. And the percentage of African American jurists on Georgia appellate courts is only 16.7 percent in a state where blacks comprise 30.5 percent of the population. These aren't good numbers.
The reason diversity matters so much is that public confidence in our courts is stronger when the judiciary bears some broad resemblance to the community it serves, rather than an exclusive segment of it. Flipping the script with respect to the Georgia Supreme Court, for instance, imagine if there were eight female justices and only one male, or seven African American justices and only two justices who were white.
Also, selection practices that appear weighted against the appointment of competent and able lawyers on the basis of their sex or race offend basic principles of equality and fairness. Plus, the availability of a number of different perspectives among the judges who serve on our courts, particularly at the appellate level, better informs the decision making process and leads to better results. If, after all, we really thought that all judges saw things the same way, we wouldn't need a high court with nine seats. One seat would be enough! Appellate jurists are often confronted with a number of choices, so who the judges are matters.
In sum, judicial diversity is not only a matter of legitimacy, equality and fairness. It goes to the very quality of the decisions made by our courts. A greater appreciation of this fact by those who have the power to appoint future appellate judges, as well as those who should bypass the appointment process altogether and offer themselves for election, would ensure that there is no further retreat from a diverse and more inclusive judiciary in the coming years.
Leah Ward Sears
Atlanta
Partner, Smith, Gambrell & Russell; former chief justice, Georgia Supreme Court
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLetter: Georgia Legal Community Mourns Loss of Joseph Bankoff
Trending Stories
- 1Jury Says $118M: Netlist Wins Another Patent Verdict Against Samsung
- 2Big Law Communications, Media Attorneys Brace For Changes Under Trump
- 3Will England Accept that Digital Assets Are ‘Property’?
- 4Congress and Courts Are Considering Litigation Financing: Is Disclosure Imminent?
- 5Bar Report — Nov. 25, 2024
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250