Dog Bite Trial Ends in $450K Settlement Before Closing Arguments
The defense had argued that Winston the hound dog never bitten anyone, including the plaintiff.
October 04, 2018 at 07:02 PM
5 minute read
A dog-bite trial in Cobb County settled for $450,000 before closing arguments Wednesday, ending a case in which the owners of “hound dog” named Winston claimed he had never bitten anyone, including plaintiff Greg Summerhill, who underwent two knee surgeries subsequent to the incident.
Plaintiffs attorney Michael Rafi said the defense's highest offer to settle pretrial was $100,000.
“Their position from start to finish was that the dog never bit Greg, despite the testimony of three eyewitnesses, photos of the punctures in his knee, and testimony from the doctor at Emory that he had bite marks,” said Rafi, who handled the case with Rafi Law Firm partner Arthur York.
Key to the defense were assertions that Summerhill stayed on the job after the bite, which Rafi confirmed.
“He worked as best he could the rest of the day,” said Rafi. “The big disagreement was whether he had carried furniture and boxes upstairs, and the other three witnesses—who had nothing to lose either way—said he didn't do that.”
The dog was on a leash being held by co-defendant Angela Garcia-Ferrer, Rafi said. She offered Summerhill a bandage afterward, he added.
Defense attorney Richard Eason Jr., who handled the case with Eason, Kennedy & Crawford partner David Crawford, declined to comment.
According to Rafi and court filings, Summerhill, now 51, was part of a crew moving the belongings of Ramone and Angela Garcia-Ferrer into a house in Marietta in 2014 when the incident occurred.
Rafi said the woman had two dogs on leashes on the sidewalk in front of the house, one of which was Winston, a hound mix that Rafi said weighed about 45 pounds.
“We said they were retractable leashes, she said they were solid [non-expandable] leashes,” Rafi said.
Rafi said witnesses testified that Winston had jumped up and strained at his leash, and when Garcia-Ferrer released tension and said “meet the men,” Winston bit Summerhill.
Summerhill worked the rest of the day that Saturday and called in Monday to say he couldn't work. He called the Emory Clinic the next day and booked a visit for the following week, the earliest time he could get.
Summerhill underwent two arthroscopic knee surgeries and rehabilitation, running up more than $161,000 in medical bills. Rafi said he is likely to need a knee replacement in the future as well.
According to the defense portion of the pretrial order, Winston was on a solid 6-foot leash “under the complete control” of Garcia-Ferrer, and “never moved” toward Summerhill.
Winston had never before been the subject of any complaint, and “no one called animal control, the police or reported to any doctor of emergency room” afterward, it said.
“Garcia-Ferrer never saw any bite, wound, blood or injury of any kind,” the order said.
Rather, it argued, Summerhill's degenerative knee problems were the result of years of heavy lifting and moving furniture.
Rafi filed a negligence suit in Cobb County State Court naming the Garcia-Ferrers as defendants in 2016.
Their IDS Property Casualty homeowners' policy carried a $500,000 limit, Rafi said, and in September 2016 he sent an offer of judgment to settle the case for $190,000.
Last November, shortly after a failed mediation before Gino Brogdon Jr. at Miles Mediation, the defense responded with an offer of $100,000.
Rafi said Summerhill reached a “very favorable” settlement on his workers' compensation claim, “and that gave us the ability to push this forward for him.”
Trial began Monday before Judge Carl Bowers.
Rafi said his arguments emphasized the testimony of Summerhill's three fellow movers—two of whom were from out of state and had never met him before—and his doctor.
“We told the jury the case was 'they said v. she said,'” Rafi said. “They all had the same story, and the jury would have had to disbelieve all those witnesses, and we thought that was unreasonable.”
The case settled Wednesday as the parties were preparing for a charge conference.
“I have to say the defense lawyers worked extremely hard,” said Rafi. “They were presented with very tough facts and did the best they possibly could with them.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrying to Reason With Hurricane Season: Mediating First Party Property Insurance Claims
'I Thank You': Attorney Leverages Daily Report Article to Turn $42K Offer Into $600K Settlement
7 minute readFirst Came the SEC, Now Investors Raise Allegations Against Acadia Healthcare
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250