Witness in Hardwick Embezzlement Trial Describes Need to Fete Law Firm Clients
As Nat Hardwick's defense kicked off their case, prosecutors asked the judge to bar testimony by a forensic accountant who has been observing the trial.
October 04, 2018 at 09:23 AM
5 minute read
Witness testimony moved fast on the first day of the defense's case in Atlanta lawyer Nathan Hardwick IV's embezzlement trial in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia.
Lead defense counsel Ed Garland of Garland Samuel & Loeb presented a string of witnesses Wednesday to persuade jurors that much of Hardwick's heavy spending was aimed at developing and entertaining clients. He also told Judge Eleanor Ross that the defense team might be done by Friday—and has not decided whether Hardwick will testify.
The government accuses Hardwick of stealing $26 million from the escrow accounts of his now-defunct residential real estate firm, Morris Hardwick Schneider, and has charged him with 24 counts of conspiracy to commit wire fraud, wire fraud and making false statements to financial institutions. If convicted, he faces up to 34 years in prison.
Federal prosecutors indicted MHS's former controller Asha Maurya as a co-conspirator for allegedly wiring funds from IOLTA accounts at Hardwick's direction to pay his personal bills to casinos, charter jet companies and creditors, including $12.4 million to his personal holding company, Divot Holdings.
Maurya, who has admitted to taking almost $900,000 from MHS, pleaded guilty to a single count of conspiracy to commit wire fraud last year and is cooperating with the government.
Hardwick's defense team has maintained since the escrow shortfalls became public in August 2014 that Maurya, not Hardwick, was the only culprit.
However federal prosecutors rested their case Tuesday evening after the seventh day of document-intensive testimony without calling Maurya. Garland told the judge Tuesday that he wanted to call her as a hostile witness, but Maurya's lawyer, Page Pate of Pate & Johnson, said she'd refuse to testify under the Fifth Amendment.
Also behind the scenes, the prosecutors and defense lawyers are at loggerheads over whether the defense can call a forensic accountant that it's hired, J.P. Gingras, as an expert witness to critique the prosecutors' accounting math—particularly on how much Hardwick received in profit distributions during the charged conspiracy period of 2011 through August 2014, when the shortfalls came to light.
The government has presented the jury documentation showing that Hardwick took $20.6 million from the firm from 2011 to 2013, even though the firm's net income was only a bit above $10 million for the period.
Ross has allowed Gingras to sit in the courtroom and observe the case since voir dire began on Sept. 17. The judge said she'd make a ruling Thursday on using him as an expert.
The defense team also said it has witnesses to testify that Maurya took money from other companies where she has worked.
Parade of Witnesses
Garland's team presented seven witnesses to the jury Wednesday, including Hardwick's former equity partner, Gerard “Rod” Wittstadt. He and his brother Mark Wittstadt each owned 22.2 percent of MHS, while Hardwick owned 55.5 percent.
The defense introduced the idea that Hardwick spent a lot of money entertaining clients and potential clients for business development, which included trips to expensive golf tournaments. A law firm consultant, John Remsen, testified that building personal relationships with clients and potential clients by inviting them to “unique events” is key to winning business, and hosting them at golf events is a common practice.
MHS's sister company, LandCastle Title, took clients to the AT&T Pebble Beach Pro-Am in California and the Hootie & the Blowfish Monday After the Masters Celebrity Pro-Am, according to firm brochures that Garland showed the jury.
A residential homebuilder who said he'd been Hardwick's client at MHS for $800 million to $900 million worth of house closings over about 15 years, told the jury that Hardwick also entertained him, including golf outings at Hawk's Ridge Golf Club north of Atlanta.
The builder said he frequently spotted Hardwick having meals with clients at the St. Regis Hotel in Buckhead, where both owned condos.
But on cross-examination, Assistant U.S. Attorney Lynsey Barron told Remsen that the passengers on the jets Hardwick chartered for the golf trips were family members and old college friends, as were the golf companions shown with Hardwick in photos from the tournaments—not clients. “Often friends become clients and clients become friends,” he replied.
Rod Wittstadt testified that Hardwick had discussed taking LandCastle Title public or selling the title business's back-office operation to private investors. Garland said the law firm had been valued at $70 million.
But the value of a firm “missing roughly $30 million from its escrow accounts” is “nothing,” Wittstadt told Barron on cross-examination.
Wittstadt and his brother had instructed Hardwick not to bill the firm for his private jet travel, but it would reimburse him the price of a first-class plane ticket, he told Barron. “Mr. Hardwick told us he did not like flying on commercial airlines,” Wittstadt said, because he felt “claustrophobic and did not like being with the public.”
This story has been updated to correct the spelling of Assistant U.S. Attorney Lynsey Barron's last name.
READ MORE:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFowler White Burnett Opens Jacksonville Office Focused on Transportation Practice
3 minute readGeorgia High Court Clarifies Time Limit for Lawyers' Breach-of-Contract Claims
6 minute readSoutheast Firm Leaders Predict Stability, Growth in Second Trump Administration
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Litigation Leaders: Greenspoon Marder’s Beth-Ann Krimsky on What Makes Her Team ‘Prepared, Compassionate and Wicked Smart’
- 2A Look Back at High-Profile Hires in Big Law From Federal Government
- 3Grabbing Market Share From Rivals, Law Firms Ramped Up Group Lateral Hires
- 4Navigating Twitter's 'Rocky Deal Process' Helped Drive Simpson Thacher's Tech and Telecom Practice
- 5Public Notices/Calendars
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250