Witness in Hardwick Embezzlement Trial Describes Need to Fete Law Firm Clients
As Nat Hardwick's defense kicked off their case, prosecutors asked the judge to bar testimony by a forensic accountant who has been observing the trial.
October 04, 2018 at 09:23 AM
5 minute read
Witness testimony moved fast on the first day of the defense's case in Atlanta lawyer Nathan Hardwick IV's embezzlement trial in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia.
Lead defense counsel Ed Garland of Garland Samuel & Loeb presented a string of witnesses Wednesday to persuade jurors that much of Hardwick's heavy spending was aimed at developing and entertaining clients. He also told Judge Eleanor Ross that the defense team might be done by Friday—and has not decided whether Hardwick will testify.
The government accuses Hardwick of stealing $26 million from the escrow accounts of his now-defunct residential real estate firm, Morris Hardwick Schneider, and has charged him with 24 counts of conspiracy to commit wire fraud, wire fraud and making false statements to financial institutions. If convicted, he faces up to 34 years in prison.
Federal prosecutors indicted MHS's former controller Asha Maurya as a co-conspirator for allegedly wiring funds from IOLTA accounts at Hardwick's direction to pay his personal bills to casinos, charter jet companies and creditors, including $12.4 million to his personal holding company, Divot Holdings.
Maurya, who has admitted to taking almost $900,000 from MHS, pleaded guilty to a single count of conspiracy to commit wire fraud last year and is cooperating with the government.
Hardwick's defense team has maintained since the escrow shortfalls became public in August 2014 that Maurya, not Hardwick, was the only culprit.
However federal prosecutors rested their case Tuesday evening after the seventh day of document-intensive testimony without calling Maurya. Garland told the judge Tuesday that he wanted to call her as a hostile witness, but Maurya's lawyer, Page Pate of Pate & Johnson, said she'd refuse to testify under the Fifth Amendment.
Also behind the scenes, the prosecutors and defense lawyers are at loggerheads over whether the defense can call a forensic accountant that it's hired, J.P. Gingras, as an expert witness to critique the prosecutors' accounting math—particularly on how much Hardwick received in profit distributions during the charged conspiracy period of 2011 through August 2014, when the shortfalls came to light.
The government has presented the jury documentation showing that Hardwick took $20.6 million from the firm from 2011 to 2013, even though the firm's net income was only a bit above $10 million for the period.
Ross has allowed Gingras to sit in the courtroom and observe the case since voir dire began on Sept. 17. The judge said she'd make a ruling Thursday on using him as an expert.
The defense team also said it has witnesses to testify that Maurya took money from other companies where she has worked.
Parade of Witnesses
Garland's team presented seven witnesses to the jury Wednesday, including Hardwick's former equity partner, Gerard “Rod” Wittstadt. He and his brother Mark Wittstadt each owned 22.2 percent of MHS, while Hardwick owned 55.5 percent.
The defense introduced the idea that Hardwick spent a lot of money entertaining clients and potential clients for business development, which included trips to expensive golf tournaments. A law firm consultant, John Remsen, testified that building personal relationships with clients and potential clients by inviting them to “unique events” is key to winning business, and hosting them at golf events is a common practice.
MHS's sister company, LandCastle Title, took clients to the AT&T Pebble Beach Pro-Am in California and the Hootie & the Blowfish Monday After the Masters Celebrity Pro-Am, according to firm brochures that Garland showed the jury.
A residential homebuilder who said he'd been Hardwick's client at MHS for $800 million to $900 million worth of house closings over about 15 years, told the jury that Hardwick also entertained him, including golf outings at Hawk's Ridge Golf Club north of Atlanta.
The builder said he frequently spotted Hardwick having meals with clients at the St. Regis Hotel in Buckhead, where both owned condos.
But on cross-examination, Assistant U.S. Attorney Lynsey Barron told Remsen that the passengers on the jets Hardwick chartered for the golf trips were family members and old college friends, as were the golf companions shown with Hardwick in photos from the tournaments—not clients. “Often friends become clients and clients become friends,” he replied.
Rod Wittstadt testified that Hardwick had discussed taking LandCastle Title public or selling the title business's back-office operation to private investors. Garland said the law firm had been valued at $70 million.
But the value of a firm “missing roughly $30 million from its escrow accounts” is “nothing,” Wittstadt told Barron on cross-examination.
Wittstadt and his brother had instructed Hardwick not to bill the firm for his private jet travel, but it would reimburse him the price of a first-class plane ticket, he told Barron. “Mr. Hardwick told us he did not like flying on commercial airlines,” Wittstadt said, because he felt “claustrophobic and did not like being with the public.”
This story has been updated to correct the spelling of Assistant U.S. Attorney Lynsey Barron's last name.
READ MORE:
Alleged Co-Conspirator a No-Show as Hardwick Prosecution Rests
Hardwick Spent Law Firm's Millions on Jets, Gambling, GIrlfriends, Jurors Hear
Ex-Partner Tells Jurors That Hardwick Kept Him in the Dark
Hardwick's Ex-Partner Recounts Big Debts, Expenses in Embezzlement Trial
'A Thief and a Liar': Jurors Hear Accusations, Accounting as Hardwick Trial Begins
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSunbelt Law Firms Experienced More Moderate Growth Last Year, Alongside Some Job Cuts and Less Merger Interest
4 minute readFowler White Burnett Opens Jacksonville Office Focused on Transportation Practice
3 minute readGeorgia High Court Clarifies Time Limit for Lawyers' Breach-of-Contract Claims
6 minute readSoutheast Firm Leaders Predict Stability, Growth in Second Trump Administration
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 15th Circuit Considers Challenge to Louisiana's Ten Commandments Law
- 2Crocs Accused of Padding Revenue With Channel-Stuffing HEYDUDE Shoes
- 3E-discovery Practitioners Are Racing to Adapt to Social Media’s Evolving Landscape
- 4The Law Firm Disrupted: For Office Policies, Big Law Has Its Ear to the Market, Not to Trump
- 5FTC Finalizes Child Online Privacy Rule Updates, But Ferguson Eyes Further Changes
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250