Legal Professionals Should Seek Balance in Wake of Emotions From Kavanaugh Confirmation
Despite the many misunderstandings and disagreements that people may have, jurists should undertake to maintain a sense of equanimity in both their professional and personal lives.
October 17, 2018 at 11:13 AM
2 minute read
The recent appointment of former U.S. Circuit Judge Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court of the United States has been met with a variety of mixed emotions ranging from optimism to intense trepidation. Following in the wake of what many would consider to be the most contentious judicial confirmation process in U.S. history, citizens and persons from around the world are exhibiting varying sentiments regarding the future of our country and its political branches. Despite the stark contrasts in positions and emotional reactions, citizens on both sides of the political aisle have been commonly presented with a solemn warning—that the excessive interposition of political partisanship into the judicial system, both within its walls and outside them, will inevitably lead to the deterioration of the integrity of the American legal profession and the institutions upon which it is based.
In such times, I feel it is important to be reminded of the Roman goddess Lustitia, more commonly known as Lady Justice, the allegorical personification of morality in the judicial system, who since the 16th century has been depicted wearing a blindfold representing impartiality, the aspiration that justice should be applied evenhandedly to all.
Despite the many misunderstandings and disagreements that people may have, jurists should undertake to maintain a sense of equanimity in both their professional and personal lives. Much like the enigmatic character Professor Teufelsdröckh from Thomas Carlyle's masterpiece, “Sartor Resartus,” who endeavored in his studies while wearing green spectacles (a nod to Goethe's color wheel that viewed green as a color of balance), members of the legal profession must necessarily aspire to maintain a consistently balanced perspective and render decisions based on well-reasoned, logical principles and standards which are consistently applied irrespective of one's race, beliefs or socioeconomic background. While passion and zeal certainly have their place in the law, it is essential that attorneys and judges alike maintain a consistently clear focus on the importance of earning and maintaining the confidence and trust of the people we serve.
Nick Booth is a 2017 graduate of the University of Georgia School of Law and an associate at O'Dell & O'Neal in Marietta.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBusiness Breakups: Why Business and Commercial Cases Are Well-Suited to Mediation
5 minute readIn RE: Hair Relaxer Marketing, Sales Practices and Products Liability Litigation
Trending Stories
- 1Environmental Fines: Texas Secures Over $100M From Petrochemical Processor TPC Group
- 2US Law Firm Leasing Up Nearly 30% Through Q3, With a Growing Number of Firms Staying in Place
- 3SEC Targets Rising Crypto Financier in $115 Million Securities Fraud
- 4Musk Avoids Sanctions for Skipping SEC Testimony for Rocket Launch
- 5On Advice of DOJ Office, Special Counsel Moves to End Trump Prosecution
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250