Titanic Collection Stays Afloat Despite Bankrupt Parent Company
A collection of 5,500 artifacts from the doomed ocean liner has found a buyer, after a planned auction at Troutman Sanders' Atlanta offices was canceled for lack of qualified bidders.
October 19, 2018 at 01:51 PM
5 minute read
While it's no consolation for the original passengers, it's clear sailing now for the massive collection of 5,500 artifacts salvaged from the Titantic, ranging from a piece of the ship's hull to the contents of passengers' luggage.
The collection and rights to the shipwreck excavation site were set to be sold in a bankruptcy auction Oct. 11 at Troutman Sanders' Atlanta headquarters, but the auction sank for a lack of qualified bidders.
Instead, a consortium of three hedge funds—the designated stalking-horse purchaser if the auction didn't go through—has bought the assets of Premier Exhibitions, which through its subsidiary RMS Titanic owns the Titanic collection and salvage rights, for $19.5 million as part of the exhibition company's bankruptcy proceedings.
Troutman is bankruptcy counsel for RMS Titanic, while Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough represents Premier.
Atlanta-based Premier operates a traveling Titanic exhibit, along with “Bodies: The Exhibition” and “Xtreme BUGS!” The hedge funds—Apollo Global Management, Alta Fundamental Advisers and PacBridge Capital Partners—will continue operating Premier as a “going concern,” said Marshall Glade, a managing director for GlassRatner Advisory & Capital Group, Premier's financial adviser for the bankruptcy.
Premier's roughly 100 employees will keep their jobs, and the Titanic artifacts will stay intact, Glade said, making the sale a “really positive outcome.” The $19.5 million purchase price gives Premier's unsecured creditors an 80 percent recovery, he added.
“The exhibit will continue to tell the tragic story of the Titanic for the time to come,” he said.
That should quell the fears of TitanicNewsChannel.com's proprietor, Mark Taylor, who had worried in blog posts that the collection would be broken up or sold to Chinese investors for a Titanic theme park in China where a full-scale replica of the ship is being built.
The equity committee for a determined group of minority shareholders had contested the sale to the hedge funds, claiming it was an “insider deal,” but Judge Paul Glenn of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of Florida approved it Oct. 18.
The U.S. government, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, the U.K.'s National Maritime Museum, and UNESCO's Division for Heritage, have also weighed in on the Titanic's bankruptcy sale, via filings in RMS Titanic's separate salvor-in-possession case in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia.
The National Maritime Museum also opposed the sale, claiming in a filing in the salvor-in-possession case that the company was trying to sell itself to “statutory insiders.”
The auction was not for the casual souvenir hunter. Premier required a minimum bid of $21.5 million for prospective buyers to participate, along with a 10 percent cash deposit to show they were serious.
But the exhibition company canceled the auction after it received no qualified bids before its Oct. 5 bid deadline, according to bankruptcy filings. The National Maritime Museum with a consortium of British museums had earlier made a bid for $19.2 million, but it did not meet the auction bid conditions.
No Break-Up
Some observers have wondered why the Titanic collection was not broken apart and sold to the general public to fetch a higher price.
There is an appetite for individual Titanic items. Artifacts retrieved by survivors, separate from the RMS Titanic collection, have sold for big bucks, including a violin recovered from the body of the ship's band leader, which went for $1.4 million, and a fur coat donned by a crew member that brought $235,000. A cracker from a survival kit sold for $23,000.
The collection has been appraised at almost $200 million, noted Amanda Rottermund of Withers, which handles art and memorabilia collections.
“The Titanic artifacts are memorabilia,” Rottermund said. “Why not have a sale in a more traditional auction way? Break up the lots and sell them at Christies, Sotheby's or Bonhams, and let the public take home a piece,” she asked, adding that the IP and salvage rights could be sold separately.
But RMS Titanic must keep the artifacts, the IP (which includes film footage from site dives) and its exploration rights to the shipwreck site together as a condition of its status as salvor-in-possession.
The same condition would apply to any buyer, which may have narrowed the field for prospective auction bidders.
That condition has been in place since 1994, when a federal judge for U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia made RMS Titanic the salvor-in-possession, under the condition that it maintain the artifacts collection properly, allow research and public access, and protect the shipwreck site.
That included fending off a tour operator's plan earlier this year to take tourists on wreck dives for $100,000 apiece and create a 3-D virtual model of the wreck using sonar, laser and video.
As salvor-in-possession, the company also agreed to continued oversight by the court. Any exploration or salvage expedition must receive approval from NOAA and the court.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllUS Bankruptcy Filings Rise 16.2% as Interest Rates, Inflation, End of COVID Relief Hit Hard
3 minute readLongtime Kilpatrick Lawyer Exits to Help Lead Eversheds' Restructuring Team
3 minute readRudy Giuliani's Bankruptcy Dismissal Finalized Following Fee Dispute
Et Tu, EDVA? Why Big Law Is Dodging a Once-Favorable Bankruptcy Venue
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250