Quick Answer: Lawyer Wins Argument Before Filing Response
The decision means that Superior Court Judge Robert "Mack" Crawford of the Griffin Circuit may remain on the job while the JQC processes ethics charges against him involving claims that he improperly took $15,000 from a court registry.
October 26, 2018 at 05:42 PM
3 minute read
Virgil Brown of Zebulon was still drafting an argument for the Supreme Court of Georgia on Friday when the justices ruled his client's way.
The court unanimously rejected a request by the Judicial Qualifications Commission to suspend Superior Court Judge Robert “Mack” Crawford of the Griffin Circuit, who is fighting charges brought by the ethics panel.
The decision means that Crawford, who is represented by Brown and former Gov. Roy Barnes, may remain on the job while the JQC processes ethics charges against him involving claims that he improperly took $15,000 from a court registry. The Georgia Bureau of Investigation also is looking into the matter.
Brown said he was working on a response to the JQC's request that the Supreme Court suspend Crawford when he learned about the high court's decision on Friday. “I had about eight to 10 reasons why they shouldn't” suspend him, he said.
In asking for Crawford's suspension, the JQC on Wednesday said that allowing the judge to continue to preside over cases while he faces both investigations “poses a serious threat of harm to the administration of justice.”
Brown noted that Crawford, at the JQC's request and to avoid a conflict with the state government, had already recused from any criminal cases while he was being investigated.
“If they wanted him to recuse from everything, they should have asked him,” Brown added, though he said Crawford would have likely said no because he had no conflict in any civil matters.
On Friday, the state Supreme Court issued a one-paragraph order stating, “Having carefully considered the documents submitted with the motion” and the standards of the JQC's rules, “the Court hereby denies the motion.”
Ben Easterlin, the JQC director, said, “When you file a motion, you hope to win.”
Asked if the fact that Crawford hasn't been charged criminally could have been a factor in the Supreme Court's refusal to suspend the judge, Easterlin said that thinking would have been “reasonable,” given that “we have a system of presumed innocence” until charges are proven.
At the heart of both the JQC and GBI investigations is a check for nearly $15,676 in unclaimed funds in the Pike County Superior Court registry. That money was placed in the registry by Crawford, who was then in private practice, on behalf of a client in a property tax dispute.
The case was dismissed in 2009, but the funds remained in the registry until last year, when Crawford directed the court clerk in a handwritten note to write him a check for the unclaimed funds.
Crawford's counsel have countered that the registry funds were legal fees that were owed to Crawford for 16 years. Crawford claimed he forgot to collect after his client died, and a second client moved out-of-state long before the case was dismissed.
Crawford's lawyers have also argued that the JQC was unconstitutionally created. That question will be decided by the JQC's own hearing panel and, if its ruling is appealed, the state Supreme Court.
A JQC hearing on the ethics charges could take place in January.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllStuckey's Leader Using Skills as Georgia Lawyer to Help Revive Iconic Brand
6 minute readGa. Election Workers Settle Defamation Lawsuit Against Conservative Website
4 minute readTo Woo Law Firms, Legal Training Platforms Are Combining Hands-On and Online Learning
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Dechert partners Andrew J. Levander, Angela M. Liu and Neil A. Steiner have stepped in to defend Arbor Realty Trust and certain executives in a pending securities class action. The complaint, filed July 31 in New York Eastern District Court by Levi & Korsinsky, contends that the defendants concealed a 'toxic' mobile home portfolio, vastly overstated collateral in regards to the company's loans and failed to disclose an investigation of the company by the FBI. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Pamela K. Chen, is 1:24-cv-05347, Martin v. Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Arthur G. Jakoby, Ryan Feeney and Maxim M.L. Nowak from Herrick Feinstein have stepped in to defend Charles Dilluvio and Seacor Capital in a pending securities lawsuit. The complaint, filed Sept. 30 in New York Southern District Court by the Securities and Exchange Commission, accuses the defendants of using consulting agreements, attorney opinion letters and other mechanisms to skirt regulations limiting stock sales by affiliate companies and allowing the defendants to unlawfully profit from sales of Enzolytics stock. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Andrew L. Carter Jr., is 1:24-cv-07362, Securities and Exchange Commission v. Zhabilov et al.
Who Got The Work
Clark Hill members Vincent Roskovensky and Kevin B. Watson have entered appearances for Architectural Steel and Associated Products in a pending environmental lawsuit. The complaint, filed Aug. 27 in Pennsylvania Eastern District Court by Brodsky & Smith on behalf of Hung Trinh, accuses the defendant of discharging polluted stormwater from its steel facility without a permit in violation of the Clean Water Act. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Gerald J. Pappert, is 2:24-cv-04490, Trinh v. Architectural Steel And Associated Products, Inc.
Who Got The Work
Michael R. Yellin of Cole Schotz has entered an appearance for S2 d/b/a the Shoe Surgeon, Dominic Chambrone a/k/a Dominic Ciambrone and other defendants in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The case, filed July 15 in New York Southern District Court by DLA Piper on behalf of Nike, seeks to enjoin Ciambrone and the other defendants in their attempts to build an 'entire multifaceted' retail empire through their unauthorized use of Nike’s trademark rights. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald, is 1:24-cv-05307, Nike Inc. v. S2, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Sullivan & Cromwell partner Adam S. Paris has entered an appearance for Orthofix Medical in a pending securities class action arising from a proposed acquisition of SeaSpine by Orthofix. The suit, filed Sept. 6 in California Southern District Court, by Girard Sharp and the Hall Firm, contends that the offering materials and related oral communications contained untrue statements of material fact. According to the complaint, the defendants made a series of misrepresentations about Orthofix’s disclosure controls and internal controls over financial reporting and ethical compliance. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Linda Lopez, is 3:24-cv-01593, O'Hara v. Orthofix Medical Inc. et al.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250