Topping Out Date Set for New Justice Building
“It's really coming into form,” spokeswoman Morgan Smith-Williams said. “If you drive down Memorial Drive, you'll see the outside is framed.”
October 29, 2018 at 05:38 PM
3 minute read
The new home for the Georgia Supreme Court and Court of Appeals has reached the halfway point in construction, and the steel frame is almost done, a spokeswoman for the State Properties Commission said Monday.
That last piece of steel will go up during a “topping out” ceremony on Nov. 13, according to Morgan Smith-Williams, public relations coordinator for the commission and Building Authority. The topping-out event will be a chance to celebrate for the contractor, Gilbane, and the architectural firm, Stevens & Wilkinson, but Smith-Williams said the justices from the Supreme Court and the judges from the Court of Appeals will also be invited.
As it turns out, the date is the same as the opening of the emergency called session of the General Assembly to address budget changes because of the hurricane damage to so many Georgia counties.
“It's really coming into form,” Smith-Williams said. “If you drive down Memorial Drive, you'll see the outside is framed.”
The building is the brick-and-mortar part of Gov. Nathan Deal's vision for the state's justice system, the first home for the intermediate and high appellate courts, which up until now have been jammed into state office buildings with the attorney general and other departments.
Legislative leaders have already announced plans to name the building after the governor: the Nathan Deal Judicial Center.
Initial plans had been to open the building in August 2019. The ribbon-cutting ceremony has now been pushed to December, with hopes of moving judges and their staffs in during the holiday season and opening to the public at the start of 2020, Smith-Williams said.
Thus far, the state has appropriated $122 million for the building. First came a $7.5 million outlay in 2015 for design. In 2016, the state set aside $6.5 million to demolish the abandoned state archives building that was on the site. The building authority sold $105 million worth of bonds in 2017 for the bulk of the financing. An additional $3.5 million came from a supplemental budget appropriation last year to finish the cleanup, which included removal of toxic chemicals from a dry cleaner and gas station once on the land, according to Building Authority Executive Director Steve Stancil.
The plan calls for 224,000 square feet of space on a 5-acre site facing the gold dome of the Capitol, with a 112-foot atrium that will connect six of the eight floors, Smith-Williams said. The next change visible from the ground will be the addition of large windows. Smith-Williams said the contractor wants those installed as soon as possible in order to operate the heating and air conditioning system, which is important to protecting the wood and terrazzo that will go on the inside.
The building also will have a pull-through area for drop-off and pickup, which could come in handy, since it doesn't have public parking planned. Secured parking underneath the building will be for judges only. For everyone else, parking options will look about the same as now. Smith-Williams suggested the garages on the other side of the Capitol, noting that parking is already a problem on the hill.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllA Plan Is Brewing to Limit Big-Dollar Suits in Georgia—and Lawyers Have Mixed Feelings
10 minute readOn The Move: Kilpatrick Adds West Coast IP Pro, Partners In Six Cities Join Nelson Mullins, Freeman Mathis
6 minute readDid Ahmaud Arbery's Killers Get Help From Glynn County DA? Jury Hears Clashing Accounts
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250