Georgia GOP Settles Campaign Libel Lawsuit
The state GOP agreed in the settlement agreement to stop referring to Josh McLaurin—an associate at Krevolin & Horst and a candidate for state House District 51—as being under criminal investigation.
November 01, 2018 at 05:17 PM
4 minute read
The Georgia Republican Party has settled a libel lawsuit over mailers the party financed targeting an attorney running as a Democrat for a suburban Atlanta state House seat.
In a settlement agreement signed Thursday, the state GOP agreed to stop referring to Josh McLaurin—an associate at Krevolin & Horst and a candidate for state House District 51—as being under criminal investigation. The GOP paid for three separate mailers using the language, two of which came after a cease-and-desist letter was sent by McLaurin's attorney, Stacey Evans, warning the language was libelous.
Evans said she negotiated the settlement with Richard Robbins, founding partner of The Robbins Law Group, who represented the GOP.
McLaurin is running against Sandy Springs attorney Alex Kaufman of Kaufman & Forman for the House seat vacated by Republican lawyer Wendell Willard. Willard, the longtime chairman of the state House Judiciary Committee, anointed Kaufman as his successor last spring.
McLaurin announced the settlement on Twitter. “Today, the Georgia Republican Party settled my libel case against it by promising never again to say I'm 'under criminal investigation.' I am grateful to @EvansforGeorgia for helping me hold the GOP accountable for its lies. The truth still matters.”
The GOP mailers references to a “criminal investigation” were based on an administrative complaint filed in May with Secretary of State Brian Kemp by Vincent Russo, the GOP's chief deputy general counsel and counsel to Kemp's Republican gubernatorial campaign. Russo is a partner with The Robbins Law Group and also works with the firm's new lobbying arm, RGR.
An earlier administrative complaint Russo and law partner David Dove, Kemp's former chief of staff and legal counsel, filed on behalf of a former Sandy Springs city councilman to challenge McLaurin's residency was thrown out in April by an administrative law judge.
In an Oct. 9 letter to the GOP, Evans demanded a retraction in a curative mailer. The party doubled down instead, sending out two more mailers repeating and expanding on the “criminal investigation” claims.
Contending that “false and defamatory statements” about McLaurin were made with actual malice, Evans said the state GOP “crossed the threshold from speech protected by the First Amendment to enter the arena of actionable defamation.”
The GOP didn't acknowledge any wrongdoing in the settlement agreement but promised it will no longer pay, assist or participate in making any political mailers and will issue no media statements attempting to link McLaurin to any criminal investigation. The GOP also agreed it will not sue McLaurin over claims he violated the state's anti-SLAPP (Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation) statute when he sued the GOP.
Evans, a former state legislator who lost a bid for the Democratic gubernatorial nomination last summer, said McLaurin and the GOP agreed to settle the case because, “Both sides wanted to be able to put it behind them. I'm glad we were able to get there. The whole time, Josh just wanted the truth. So, that's what we have now.”
Evans said that, while the GOP didn't acknowledge the campaign mailers libeled McLaurin, “We stand by our claims and allegations in the complaint that [the mailers were] libelous.”
Robbins said the GOP did not admit any fault and paid no money to settle. ”I'm glad we were able to resolve it and people can focus on the issues,” he added.
Late Thursday, Kaufman—who was not named as a defendant in McLaurin's libel suit—sent the Daily Report a written statement calling the suit “meritless” and “a political stunt.”
Kaufman earlier referred the Daily Report to the GOP as the group responsible for distributing the mailers in question.
“Everything my campaign has said and written is factually accurate,” Kaufman said. “The settlement doesn't affect my campaign as I continue to draw a contrast between me and my opponent.”
Read the settlement agreement:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllOn the Move: Hunton Andrews Kurth Practice Leader Named Charlotte Managing Partner
6 minute readPaul Weiss’ Shanmugam Joins 11th Circuit Fight Over False Claims Act’s Constitutionality
Atlanta Attorneys Rely on Google Earth, YouTube for Evidence in $6M Faulty Guardrail Settlement
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250