Heating Pad Product Liability Lawsuit Flames Out
The judges ruled that, even though a woman fell asleep on a heating pad and woke up with her bed on fire, a product liability lawsuit must show evidence that a defect is probable, not just possible.
November 02, 2018 at 05:11 PM
3 minute read
Conair Corp. has survived a product liability lawsuit alleging that a heating pad set a bed on fire and burned down a house and killed the pets.
The Georgia Court of Appeals affirmed a grant of summary judgment to the company from Effingham County State Court Judge Ronald Thompson.
Judge Brian Rickman wrote the opinion released Tuesday. He was joined by Presiding Judges John Ellington and Christopher McFadden. The judges concluded that, although Mary Sheffield did lie down on her new heating pad with a pain in her neck on Sept. 30, 2013, and wake up with her bed in flames, she failed to provide evidence that the pad caused the fire or even that it was defective.
Sheffield “had the burden of pointing to specific evidence giving rise to a triable issue of fact regarding the causal connection between Conair's alleged design defect and the fire that resulted in their injuries,” Rickman said. “The record evidence, however, allows for only an inference that the heating pad caused the fire, and that inference does not extend to the cause being the result of a design defect.”
Richman added that inferences “must be based on probabilities rather than mere possibilities.” The local fire chief testified that he believed the fire started “in the area of the heating pad,” Rickman said. But he could not say for sure what caused the fire.
In any case, Rickman repeated the defense argument that Sheffield “misued” the heating pad by falling asleep on it—against the warning on the label. The pads range in price from about $15 to $25. The product Sheffield used did not have an automatic safety shut off feature.
Sheffield was represented by Michael Robl of Robl Law Group in Tucker. He could not be reached.
Conair was represented by Jeffery Saxby of Hall Booth Smith in Atlanta.
Saxby said Friday that he doesn't believe the pad caused the fire. The defense expert was able to examine the pad and determine it was not defective. And if it had started the fire, it would have been consumed by flames, which it was not, he said.
The defense offered another theory as to the cause of the fire. Saxby alleged Sheffield was “a pack-a-day smoker,” although she testified she never smoked in bed.
Said Saxby, “Our position was the heating pad was a victim of the fire, not the cause.”
The case is Sheffield v. Conair, No. A18A1032.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllA Plan Is Brewing to Limit Big-Dollar Suits in Georgia—and Lawyers Have Mixed Feelings
10 minute readOn The Move: Kilpatrick Adds West Coast IP Pro, Partners In Six Cities Join Nelson Mullins, Freeman Mathis
6 minute readDid Ahmaud Arbery's Killers Get Help From Glynn County DA? Jury Hears Clashing Accounts
Trending Stories
- 1Gunderson Dettmer Opens Atlanta Office With 3 Partners From Morris Manning
- 2Decision of the Day: Court Holds Accident with Post Driver Was 'Bizarre Occurrence,' Dismisses Action Brought Under Labor Law §240
- 3Judge Recommends Disbarment for Attorney Who Plotted to Hack Judge's Email, Phone
- 4Two Wilkinson Stekloff Associates Among Victims of DC Plane Crash
- 5Two More Victims Alleged in New Sean Combs Sex Trafficking Indictment
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250