Heating Pad Product Liability Lawsuit Flames Out
The judges ruled that, even though a woman fell asleep on a heating pad and woke up with her bed on fire, a product liability lawsuit must show evidence that a defect is probable, not just possible.
November 02, 2018 at 05:11 PM
3 minute read
Conair Corp. has survived a product liability lawsuit alleging that a heating pad set a bed on fire and burned down a house and killed the pets.
The Georgia Court of Appeals affirmed a grant of summary judgment to the company from Effingham County State Court Judge Ronald Thompson.
Judge Brian Rickman wrote the opinion released Tuesday. He was joined by Presiding Judges John Ellington and Christopher McFadden. The judges concluded that, although Mary Sheffield did lie down on her new heating pad with a pain in her neck on Sept. 30, 2013, and wake up with her bed in flames, she failed to provide evidence that the pad caused the fire or even that it was defective.
Sheffield “had the burden of pointing to specific evidence giving rise to a triable issue of fact regarding the causal connection between Conair's alleged design defect and the fire that resulted in their injuries,” Rickman said. “The record evidence, however, allows for only an inference that the heating pad caused the fire, and that inference does not extend to the cause being the result of a design defect.”
Richman added that inferences “must be based on probabilities rather than mere possibilities.” The local fire chief testified that he believed the fire started “in the area of the heating pad,” Rickman said. But he could not say for sure what caused the fire.
In any case, Rickman repeated the defense argument that Sheffield “misued” the heating pad by falling asleep on it—against the warning on the label. The pads range in price from about $15 to $25. The product Sheffield used did not have an automatic safety shut off feature.
Sheffield was represented by Michael Robl of Robl Law Group in Tucker. He could not be reached.
Conair was represented by Jeffery Saxby of Hall Booth Smith in Atlanta.
Saxby said Friday that he doesn't believe the pad caused the fire. The defense expert was able to examine the pad and determine it was not defective. And if it had started the fire, it would have been consumed by flames, which it was not, he said.
The defense offered another theory as to the cause of the fire. Saxby alleged Sheffield was “a pack-a-day smoker,” although she testified she never smoked in bed.
Said Saxby, “Our position was the heating pad was a victim of the fire, not the cause.”
The case is Sheffield v. Conair, No. A18A1032.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSupreme Court of Georgia Accepts 2 Petitions for Voluntary Discipline With 2-Year Suspension, 1 Voluntary Surrender of License
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250