Braves Cry Foul in Trademark Suit Against 'Braves Taxi' Biz
The suit accuses the cab company of "intentionally freeriding on the success and popularity of the Atlanta Braves by brazenly copying the Atlanta Braves' trademarks and trade dress."
November 05, 2018 at 11:31 AM
3 minute read
The Atlanta Braves are asking a federal judge to call a local cab company “out” over its use of the team's name, trademarked emblems and famous tomahawk logo without permission.
A lawsuit filed Thursday in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia said the Acworth-based “Braves Taxi” company is operating “virtually in the shadow of SunTrust Park” as it piggybacks on decades of goodwill toward the local team despite having no licensing agreement.
Braves Taxi and its owner, Hector Tirado, “are intentionally freeriding on the success and popularity of the Atlanta Braves by brazenly copying the Atlanta Braves' trademarks and trade dress, in an effort to dupe unwitting fans or other Atlantans into believing defendants' taxi company is owned by, associated or affiliated with, or sponsored or endorsed by the Atlanta Braves,” said the complaint, filed by Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton partner R. Charles Henn Jr. and associates Jennifer Deal and Kenesia Cook.
According to the suit, Braves Taxi has refused to stop using the Braves' trademarks even after being notified that they were in violation of the law, and instead “repeatedly tried to gain financially from their infringement by demanding payment of exorbitant sums” to remove them.
The complaint includes a claim for violation of federal cyberpiracy law, asserting that the taxi company's Web address—www.BravesTaxi.com—“includes an identical and confusingly similar version of the Braves mark.”
Henn said he did not have permission to discuss the case, and a spokesman for Major League Baseball declined to comment.
The number of the cab company's elaborate website—also replete with Braves imagery—rang unanswered Friday, and there was no immediate response to an email sent to the company.
The complaint includes photographs of official “Braves Around Town” vehicles, whose decorations include a “BAT” logo, alongside photos of Braves Taxi vehicles, which are also emblazoned with the BAT emblem and bear a strong resemblance to the Braves vehicles.
The complaint notes that, among its myriad marketing and sponsorship agreements, is one with ride-sharing service Uber.
The Braves have “an extensive sponsorship agreement with the transportation company Uber to provide Braves fans transportation to and from Braves games at SunTrust Park,” the complaint said.
In addition to the cyberpiracy count, the complaint asserts claims for violations of federal and state law including trademark infringement, unfair competition, trademark dilution and unfair and deceptive trade practices.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAtlanta Attorneys Rely on Google Earth, YouTube for Evidence in $6M Faulty Guardrail Settlement
Fowler White Burnett Opens Jacksonville Office Focused on Transportation Practice
3 minute read'A Fierce Battle of Expert Witnesses' Expected in Cybersecurity Spat
Former UPS Workers Lodge Discrimination Suit for 'Systemic Racial Bias' in Workplace Culture
Trending Stories
- 1The Key Moves in the Reshuffling German Legal Market as 2025 Dawns
- 2Social Media Celebrities Clash in $100M Lawsuit
- 3Federal Judge Sets 2026 Admiralty Bench Trial in Baltimore Bridge Collapse Litigation
- 4Trump Media Accuses Purchaser Rep of Extortion, Harassment After Merger
- 5Judge Slashes $2M in Punitive Damages in Sober-Living Harassment Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250