Federal Judge Orders More Rejected Absentee Ballots Validated
U.S. District Judge Leigh May has ordered Gwinnett County to verify any absentee ballots rejected because of an incorrect or omitted birth year, saying that to do so violates state and federal law.
November 13, 2018 at 02:30 PM
6 minute read
A federal judge in Atlanta on Tuesday granted an emergency petition by a Democratic candidate for the U.S. House of Representatives that compels Gwinnett County to count all absentee ballots rejected because of a missing or incorrect birth year.
The order handed down by Judge Leigh Martin May was a potential break for the campaign of Democrat Carolyn Bourdeaux, who is battling to unseat Rep. Rob Woodall in House District 7, part of which lies in Gwinnett County. Bourdeaux trails Woodall by 901 votes out of nearly 279,000 total, according to the secretary of state's website.
May on Tuesday also granted Bourdeaux's motion to intervene in the pending federal case filed last month against then-Secretary of State Brian Kemp and the Gwinnett County Board of Elections over the county's high absentee ballot rejection rate.
The Daily Report has contacted spokeswomen for Secretary of State Robyn Crittenden and State Attorney General Chris Carr, whose office has been defending Kemp in the litigation, about the judge's new TRO. The newspaper awaits their replies.
Bryan Tyson, an attorney at Atlanta's Strickland Brockington Lewis who is outside counsel to the Gwinnett elections board, referred questions to county spokesman Joe Sorenson. The Daily Report has contacted Sorenson and is awaiting his reply.
Tuesday's order is May's second TRO involving absentee ballot rejections. On Oct. 23, in a companion suit filed by the ACLU on behalf of the Georgia Muslim Voters Project, May barred Gwinnett County from rejecting absentee ballot applications over alleged signature mismatches without first giving voters a chance to contest the decision and confirm their identities.
She issued the same, limited TRO in this case, which more broadly challenged absentee ballot rejections. The suit was filed by Atlanta attorney Bruce Brown on behalf of Georgia voters backed by the nonprofit Coalition for Good Governance
Bourdeaux is represented by a team of attorneys with Perkins Coie in Washington, D.C., and Gwinnett County attorney Veronica Higgs Cope.
Bourdeaux campaign spokesman Jake Best called the ruling a good first step.
“The county previously rejected hundreds of ballots for trivial reasons, including, but not limited to, year of birth,” he said. “We will continue to fight to have every eligible vote counted and every voter's voice heard.”
May's order is the fifth TRO issued by a federal judge within the past two weeks reversing election policies put in place by Kemp and potentially expanding the number of outstanding ballots that have yet to be counted. Kemp, the state's Republican candidate for governor, was criticized for continuing to serve as the state's chief elections officer while running for office himself.
Judge Amy Totenberg of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia issued her own TRO late Monday night ordering a review of rejected provisional ballots across the state and postponing certification of midterm election results by the acting secretary of state.
Kemp resigned last Thursday and declared himself the winner of the gubernatorial race. Democrat Stacey Abrams has not conceded the race and vowed to have every ballot—including thousands of outstanding absentee and provisional ballots—counted.
Bourdeaux and other Georgia voters who originally brought the lawsuit May acted on Tuesday told the court that least 265 absentee ballots were rejected by Gwinnett election officials because voters omitted their year of birth. The plaintiffs also said at last 58 absentee ballots were rejected because voters erroneously wrote that they were born in 2018.
May's order addressed one question: whether Gwinnett County's policy of throwing out absentee ballots solely on the basis of an omitted or incorrect birth year violates federal civil rights laws.
“The Court finds … that it does and that this narrow set of ballots should be counted,” she said.
May said that the Supreme Court of Georgia held in 2005 that while a failure to furnish required information on a ballot may be grounds for rejection, “nothing in the statute mandates the automatic rejection of any absentee ballot lacking the elector's place and/or date of birth.”
In addition, the judge added, “Gwinnett County's procedure for rejecting absentee ballots entirely on the basis of a missing or incorrect birth year is particularly problematic in light of the fact that other Georgia counties do not require absentee voters to furnish such information at all.”
“This Court does not find that a year of birth is material to determining a voter's eligibility when such information is not uniformly required across the state.”
May also said the federal Civil Rights Act forbids the practice of disqualifying voters because of an error or omission on any voter application, registration or ballot if the error is not material to determining whether an individual is qualified to vote.
The law, May said, was “intended to address the practice of requiring unnecessary information for voter registration with the intent that such requirements would increase the number of errors or omissions on the application forms, thus providing an excuse to disqualify potential voters.”
Less than 24 hours before May issued her new TRO, Crittenden issued a directive to election officials across the state to review rejected absentee ballots because of a missing or incorrect year of birth and that they can count them if the ballots were otherwise legal.
But May said that, although Crittenden's memorandum instructed election officials that they can count ballots with birthdate discrepancies, she issued the TRO because Crittenden's instructions “do not require election officials to count these absentee ballots.”
Brown said that, while May's order applies only to Gwinnett's election board he is urging Crittenden “to direct or advise all of the counties to comply with the direction that Judge May has given Gwinnett County. Counting these ballots is consistent with Georgia law, is required by federal law, and just makes common sense. There is no reason not to.”
Brown said that a birth year on a ballot is immaterial to its validity because, “The state has already determined the voter is eligible to vote by giving them an absentee ballot in the first place.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBig Law Practice Leaders 'Bullish' That Second Trump Presidency Will Be Good for Business
3 minute readBig Law Lawyers Fan Out for Election Day Volunteering in Call Centers and Litigation
7 minute readCOVID-19 Death Suit Against Nursing Home Sent to State Court, 11th Circuit Affirms
Movie Theater Agrees to Pay Former Employee $137K in EEOC Discrimination Settlement
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Election 2024: Nationwide Judicial Races and Ballot Measures to Watch
- 3Guarantees Are Back, Whether Law Firms Want to Talk About Them or Not
- 4How I Made Practice Group Chair: 'If You Love What You Do and Put the Time and Effort Into It, You Will Excel,' Says Lisa Saul of Forde & O'Meara
- 5Abbott, Mead Johnson Win Defense Verdict Over Preemie Infant Formula
- 6How Much Does the Frequency of Retirement Withdrawals Matter?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.