CNN Sues Trump Over White House Press Pass
Gibson Dunn duo Ted Boutrous and Ted Olson have jumped in to represent the news giant after the White House revoked a reporter's press pass last week.
November 13, 2018 at 10:27 AM
2 minute read
The original version of this story was published on National Law Journal
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher duo Ted Boutrous and Ted Olson are representing CNN and reporter Jim Acosta in a lawsuit filed Tuesday challenging the Trump administration's decision to suspend Acosta's access to the White House.
The lawsuit, filed in Washington, D.C., federal court, aims to restore Acosta's White House press pass, where he has covered the Trump administration for CNN. The civil complaint said the White House's revocation violates the First Amendment, the Fifth Amendment right to due process, as well as the Administrative Procedure Act.
“Plaintiffs bring this action to enforce this constitutional commitment, restore Acosta's well-deserved press credentials, and ensure that the press remains free to question the government and to report the business of the nation to the American people,” the complaint said.
The White House revoked Acosta's access after a contentious press conference last week, which saw a tangle between him and a White House aide over the use of a microphone. The Trump administration, which has long been critical of CNN and has derided it as “fake news,” claimed Acosta acted inappropriately in the incident.
The Associated Press reported that White House Press Secretary Sarah Sanders said CNN's suit “is just more grandstanding from CNN, and we will vigorously defend against his lawsuit.”
The complaint by Boutrous and Olson challenges the White House's explanation for the move. “The content and viewpoint of CNN's and Acosta's reporting on the Trump administration—not his interaction with the staffer at the November 7 press conference—were the real reason the White House indefinitely revoked his press credentials,” the filing said.
After news of the revocation first broke last Wednesday evening, Boutrous tweeted of the decision: “This sort of angry, irrational, false, arbitrary, capricious content-based discrimination regarding a White House press credential against a journalist quite clearly violates the First Amendment. See Sherrill v Knight (DC Cir 1977).”
The case was assigned to Judge Timothy Kelly of the District of Columbia. Kelly, a Trump appointee, has been seated on the court since September. Earlier this year, he sided with the Trump administration in a fight over leadership at the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
Read the lawsuit:
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
'Fulfilled Her Purpose on the Court': Presiding Judge M. Yvette Miller Is 'Ready for a New Challenge'
8 minute read
On the Move: Hunton Andrews Kurth Practice Leader Named Charlotte Managing Partner
6 minute read
Paul Weiss’ Shanmugam Joins 11th Circuit Fight Over False Claims Act’s Constitutionality
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
