Secretary of State Ordered to Review All Provisional Ballots, Postpone Certifying Election
U.S. District Judge Amy Totenberg ordered Georgia's new secretary of state to direct all Georgia counties with more than 100 provisional ballots, including 92 counties that have already certified their results, to "engage in a good faith review" of the eligibility of the voters who cast them. The order could expand the pool of valid ballots that remain to be counted by thousands. She also postponed certification of the midterm election results until as late as Nov. 20 and no earlier than Friday.
November 13, 2018 at 11:10 AM
5 minute read
In a late night order, a federal judge in Atlanta on Monday barred Georgia's new secretary of state from certifying the results of Georgia's midterm election on Wednesday and ordered a review of all rejected provisional ballots across the state.
Judge Amy Totenberg of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia said in a 56-page order that plaintiff Common Cause Georgia “has shown a substantial likelihood” that then-Secretary of State Brian Kemp's “failure to properly maintain a reliable and secure voter registration system has and will continue to result in the infringement of the rights of the voters to cast their vote and have their votes counted.”
Common Cause was represented by attorneys at the Brennan Center for Justice at New York University School of Law and Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison. The group sought the temporary restraining order on Nov. 5.
Secretary of State spokeswoman Candice Broce said the office is reviewing the order “and considering our options with legal counsel.”
It is the fourth temporary restraining order issued by federal judges in Georgia in the past two weeks that reversed voter registration and ballot policies adopted by Kemp while he was secretary of state. Kemp, who ran for governor on the Republican ticket, on Thursday resigned his post and declared himself the winner over Democrat Stacey Abrams as another federal judge in Atlanta considered whether to issue an order barring him from continuing to oversee or certify the election.
Abrams, who has vowed to make sure every ballot is counted, is seeking as yet uncounted ballots that her campaign says could throw the gubernatorial race into a runoff. On Monday at 5:38 p.m., Kemp led Abrams with 50.26 percent of the vote to Abrams' 48.79 percent. He needs 50 percent plus one vote to win the race outright.
Gov. Nathan Deal appointed attorney Robyn Crittenden to replace Kemp.
Totenberg on Monday ordered that the midterm election—which included a number of still contested races—not be certified before Friday and gave county election officials across the state until Nov. 20 to do so, a date already allowable under state law.
She directed county election superintendents to remit already certified returns by 92 of Georgia's 159 counties with tallies that included 100 or more provisional ballots to “engage in a good faith review of the eligibility of voters issued provisional ballots.”
She also chided the secretary of state for plans to certify the election Wednesday—the same day the county certification results were due “rather than taking any portion of the additional week provided under the law to fully discharge the Secretary's independent duty of review.”
“The Secretary's office early-announced decision to proceed with certification of the vote on the very date of receipt of the county-certified vote returns appears to suggest the Secretary's foregoing of its responsibility to confirm the accuracy of the results prior to final certification, including the assessment of whether serious provisional balloting count issues have been consistently and properly handled,” Totenberg said.
Totenberg also ordered the new secretary of state and the counties to immediately establish and publicize a secure and free-access hotline or website for provisional ballot voters to check whether their provisional ballots were counted and, if not, the reason so that voters have a chance to validate a rejected ballot.
The secretary of state had failed to do so, although federal election laws require it, Totenberg said.
Totenberg cited a higher number of provisional ballots in this election, compared to two previous elections and a string of reported problems involving the state's central voter registration database as the basis for her order.
“The statistical evidence of the increase in the provisional ballot rate for the 2018 general election is of a sufficient degree of significance that the Court can conclude with confidence that the variation was not due to natural fluctuation, but was instead reasonably likely to have been the result of persistent problems and/or errors in the state's voter registration system and ineffective administration of the provisional balloting scheme,” she said.
The order could expand the pool of outstanding valid ballots by thousands. The secretary of state's office has reported that 21,190 provisional ballots were cast. Elections Director Chris Harvey testified at a court hearing last week that only about 50 percent of provisional ballots are likely to be counted.
Kemp has contended that the total number of provisional ballots cast is not enough to trigger a run-off. But, Totenberg said in her order, Common Cause of Georgia “has offered declaration evidence that this may not in fact be the case, and that the provisional ballots may impact the result of the election for other candidates in the general election.”
Myrna Perez, deputy director of the Brennan Center's Democracy Program, said no one should lose the right to vote “because of mistakes in the voter registration database.” Georgia voters “deserve better than what the state wanted to give them,” she said.
“We are all stronger when every eligible voter is allowed to participate in our election,” said Sara Henderson, executive director of Common Cause Georgia.
Read the order:
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Paragraph V Displaced Lathrop': High Court Mulls Sovereign Immunity Waiver Disputes
7 minute readBig Law Practice Leaders 'Bullish' That Second Trump Presidency Will Be Good for Business
3 minute readWhere May Vacancies for Trump Arise? These GOP-Appointed Circuit Judges Qualify for Senior Status
Trending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Election 2024: Nationwide Judicial Races and Ballot Measures to Watch
- 3Guarantees Are Back, Whether Law Firms Want to Talk About Them or Not
- 4How I Made Practice Group Chair: 'If You Love What You Do and Put the Time and Effort Into It, You Will Excel,' Says Lisa Saul of Forde & O'Meara
- 5Abbott, Mead Johnson Win Defense Verdict Over Preemie Infant Formula
- 6How Much Does the Frequency of Retirement Withdrawals Matter?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.