GC of Coca-Cola European Partners Says All Firms Should Report Partner Pay Data
Coca-Cola European Partners' Clare Wardle on diversity targets, #MeToo and why law firms should include partners in pay gap reporting.
November 14, 2018 at 06:01 AM
8 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Clare Wardle is general counsel and company secretary of Coca-Cola European Partners (CCEP), which is the largest Coca-Cola bottler in the world by revenue. At LegalWeek CONNECT (hosted by the Daily Report's London affiliate, Legal Week) later this month, she will be leading a discussion about what law firms and in-house legal teams are doing to improve gender diversity.
At LegalWeek CONNECT, you're part of a panel discussion on legal departments and how they can drive better diversity, both internally and externally – what are you expecting to touch on?
Driving diversity is as important for the legal team as it is for all our other colleagues. Ensuring that we recruit and retain team members from a wide range of backgrounds and develop their full potential involves the right processes. For example, having diverse shortlists and balanced interview panels as well as programs like apprenticeships are crucial to providing the right opportunities. Engendering an inclusive culture that makes everyone feel valued, and leadership is also important; leaders should be role-modelling the behaviors they want and participating in broader company initiatives to encourage others to follow suit.
We also need to expect diversity in our wider virtual team of external lawyers and consultants from the outset, including it as a criterion in our panel review and following up by making it clear we expect strong, diverse teams.
Regarding the recent pay gap scandal, what is being done to tackle these issues? What was your view on law firms not being required to include partners in their payment reports?
The introduction of mandatory gender pay gap reporting is certainly a step forward in the journey towards gender equality and should encourage firms to review their pay structure and take action to close the gap.
However, I do think all law firms should be reporting data on partner pay. By not doing so, there is no open snapshot of the state of the market. Even if the figures aren't particularly positive, revealing partner pay shows integrity and strength of character, and clients will value the transparency. Once they report figures, firms then need to demonstrate that they're serious about tackling gender pay inequality and are taking practical steps to make progress against these commitments.
Overall, the gender pay gap needs to become more of a board-level concern within firms, with more priority given to raising awareness of gender bias and promoting equal opportunities. What we need is a shift in attitudes across the sector to make sure the issue is given the attention it warrants.
Your workshop includes talking about how different countries are approaching the issue of diversity. Can you tell me a bit more about this geographic comparison?
Across all the countries in which we operate, CCEP expects all its leaders to promote diversity and inclusion. We have a target of 40 percent of our senior leaders to be women by 2025. When looking at tools to support our goals, we do need to be conscious that there are different views on some of the approaches. For example, in France it is illegal to collect ethnicity data on employees.
What's your assessment of gender imbalance among in-house lawyers?
Statistics and published pay suggests there are still substantially more male GCs in top jobs, and one survey suggested that globally there is a 20 percent pay gap for similar jobs. One issue may be that pay offers very frequently start from a percentage increase from the existing pay, and so when recruiting out of private practice, this hardwires previous discrimination. However, in general I think that we are making good progress. It is certainly a GC's responsibility to eliminate any unfair pay practices in their own department.
➤➤ Diversity and inclusion, in particular gender equality, is the focus of day two of LegalWeek CONNECT, taking place on 28-29 November at County Hall, London SE1. Click here for more information
How have things changed in light of #MeToo? Are you noticing a change, or at least more discussion within your company?
The spate of sexual misconduct cases – in politics, entertainment and business – has shone a spotlight on power dynamics, professional standards, inappropriate behavior and abuse in the workplace and beyond.
I hope this has created an environment in which victims of abuse feel empowered to speak up, and can feel confident they will be listened to.
How can companies use their powers, be it financial or reputational, to encourage diversity in law?
Recruiting people from diverse backgrounds, and then supporting those people to progress and develop in the business, is vital. For example, to support this aim at CCEP we now make sure we have balanced interview panels.
Ensuring that people feel included, valued and listened to goes a long way as well. And there are some quite simple ways of doing that. For instance, making sure that women on maternity leave all have a buddy whose job it is to keep them up to date with what is happening at work.
Setting an example from the top is key too. At CCEP, we are lucky to have a chairman in Sol Daurella who is happy to get personally involved and a CEO in Damian Gammell who is actively supportive.
Can you give examples of how the issue of diversity is being addressed in Coca-Cola European Partners?
Our commitment to improving diversity and inclusion in the business starts at board level. We have a target of 33 percent of women on our board by 2020, which is closely monitored to ensure we meet it.
This commitment is reflected at less senior levels too – by 2025, 40 percent of management positions at CCEP are to be held by women, according to one of our goals. And we have a longer-term ambition to have equal representation at management levels at both CCEP and The Coca-Cola Company. These targets form part of 'This is Forward' – our joint sustainability action plan with The Coca Cola Company, which sets out clear and ambitious goals on some of the most pressing issues facing society today.
Similarly, we've also implemented an overarching diversity framework. Every business unit and department in CCEP has its own diversity and inclusion plan, and the business unit and function plans are reviewed by the group executive team. This approach is mirrored at unit level and results monitored.
Crucially, we encourage our leadership team and employees to drive an inclusive culture by taking part in employee networks dedicated to gender and other forms of diversity and inclusion. These include our Women's Networks Group and the Rainbow Network, which provides networking opportunities for LGBT colleagues.
How will the company look to continue this drive in the future?
As part of our sustainability action plan we have an ongoing commitment to fostering a diverse and inclusive culture in our business. We're building our female leadership pipeline at CCEP through Women in Leadership, a dedicated series of training and mentoring programs tailor-made to address the needs of our female employees at different stages of their careers. For example, our 'Leading with Purpose' program supports women mid-career, while our Signature Program helps our senior leaders forge contacts across different industries.
Why are events like LegalWeek CONNECT important for starting conversations and inciting change for the topic of diversity?
Industry events like LegalWeek CONNECT provide a great collaborative setting for leaders and like-minded people across the sector to discuss pertinent issues and potential solutions to these. As well as fantastic networking opportunities, they offer a unique platform for raising awareness of the important issues that need to be on the top of every law firm's agenda, and getting buy-in from the people that have the clout to tackle them.
Click here for more information on Legal Week CONNECT
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All!['It's Career-Ending': How Division Over Israel-Gaza Is Tearing Through Big Law 'It's Career-Ending': How Division Over Israel-Gaza Is Tearing Through Big Law](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/378/2023/11/AdobeStock_423698244-767x633.jpg)
'It's Career-Ending': How Division Over Israel-Gaza Is Tearing Through Big Law
8 minute read![US Supreme Court May Soon Overturn a Gun Safety Law That Protects Women US Supreme Court May Soon Overturn a Gun Safety Law That Protects Women](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/403/2023/10/Alphonse-Provinziano-767x633.jpg)
US Supreme Court May Soon Overturn a Gun Safety Law That Protects Women
5 minute read![Deadline Today: Fill Out ALM's Annual Mental Health Survey Deadline Today: Fill Out ALM's Annual Mental Health Survey](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/405/2020/03/Mental-health-Article-202003121718.jpg)
!['I Wasn't Sure I'd See My Family Again'—A Ukraine Managing Partner on Surviving a Year of War 'I Wasn't Sure I'd See My Family Again'—A Ukraine Managing Partner on Surviving a Year of War](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/378/2023/02/Capture_46-767x633-1.jpg)
'I Wasn't Sure I'd See My Family Again'—A Ukraine Managing Partner on Surviving a Year of War
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1States Accuse Trump of Thwarting Court's Funding Restoration Order
- 2Microsoft Becomes Latest Tech Company to Face Claims of Stealing Marketing Commissions From Influencers
- 3Coral Gables Attorney Busted for Stalking Lawyer
- 4Trump's DOJ Delays Releasing Jan. 6 FBI Agents List Under Consent Order
- 5Securities Report Says That 2024 Settlements Passed a Total of $5.2B
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250