Emory Law Professor in Hot Water for Allegedly Using Racial Slur, Again
Emory law professor Paul Zwier, who was disciplined last summer after students complained of his use of the "N-word" in class, reportedly used the slur again in a conversation with a black student on Oct. 31.
November 14, 2018 at 02:45 PM
4 minute read
The Emory law professor whose in-class use of a racial slur last summer spurred a campus rally was placed on leave pending an investigation after he allegedly used the term again last week.
An online petition calling for the ouster of professor Paul Zwier in response to the latest incident accuses him of using the N-word in a one-on-one conversation with a black student on Oct. 31.
When asked why he used it, the petition quotes Zwier as saying the word was used “in a private conversation between two people, as we talk about what our experiences are, I did not feel like there was the same kind of harm that was to be caused, or the ability to be misunderstood.”
A statement issued by Emory Law Interim Dean James Hughes Jr. said Zwier “has been placed on administrative leave following reports that he recently repeated the same racial slur that he used in a classroom lecture earlier this semester.”
Zwier did not respond to a request for comment, but in an email to “The Emory Wheel,” which first reported on the incident, he said he had “been advised by counsel not to submit to any interviews during the pendency of the investigation.”
In response to a request for information about the incident and investigation, an Emory spokeswoman only provided Hughes' statement.
Zwier sparked a firestorm in August when, in addressing a first-year torts class, he used the slur when discussing a 1967 case involving a black man who was denied service at a Texas restaurant. Zwier had said he speculated that the manager used a racial slur.
Zwier issued two written apologies, but the outcry led to a two-year bar on him teaching any course in which students are unable to choose another professor, and requirements that he undergo sensitivity and unconscious bias training, engage in sensitivity dialogues and revise his teaching manuals to reflect ways to address sensitive topics.
It also led to a “Unity Rally” at the school where organizers called for tolerance and respect on campus.
Hughes' statement on the new incident said that Emory's “commitment to the core values of diversity, inclusion and respect is longstanding and non-negotiable. We have been guided by these values in responding to both of these incidents.
“As we continue to gather the facts regarding these allegations,” it said, “it is my pledge to continue to uphold the values that guide our university, and to update the Emory Law community as we work together to heal and grow.”
But the “Call to Action” posted by the Concerned Student Body, Emory Black Law Students Association and Emory Law Student Bar Association is less forgiving.
Addressed to Hughes, Provost Dwight McBride, the Emory board of trustees and the “Greater Community,” the petition said “Zwier's words and actions undermine the academic, social, and professional environment that we have worked so hard to cultivate.”
The petition asks that Zwier be fired immediately, and that his scheduled classes be reassigned or offered elsewhere.
It also seeks mandatory cultural competency, bias and sensitivity training for all faculty, and the creation of a committee to address the issues of “race, culture, religion, and marginalized groups.”
A third request is for more transparency regarding student input surrounding faculty hiring and retention.
“These requests reflect the needs and concerns of students who came together to support the African American students struggling first-hand. In unity, we are repairing and reviving our beloved community,” it said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllUniversity of Georgia School of Law Finds Next Dean on Its Own Faculty
3 minute readTeen Charged in Barrow School Shooting and His Father to Stay in Custody After Hearings
5 minute readFTC, For-Profit Online Education Group Reach $43.5M Agreement After Consumer Protection Suit Filed Monday
Trending Stories
- 1UN Treaty Enacting Cybercrime Standards Likely to Face Headwinds in US, Other Countries
- 2Clark Hill Acquires L&E Boutique in Mexico City, Adding 5 Lawyers
- 36th Circuit Judges Spar Over Constitutionality of Ohio’s Ballot Initiative Procedures
- 4On The Move: Polsinelli Adds Health Care Litigator in Nashville, Ex-SEC Enforcer Joins BCLP in Atlanta
- 5After Mysterious Parting With Last GC, Photronics Fills Vacancy
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250