Justice Center Topping-Out Canceled Due to Gloom
Rain was the reason for the latest cancellation. But the truth was no one was much in the mood to celebrate while grieving the chief justice who helped plan the building.
November 14, 2018 at 11:36 AM
4 minute read
The topping-out ceremony for the state's new justice center—reset from Tuesday to Thursday this week—has been canceled again, according to representatives of the Georgia Supreme Court and the Georgia Building Authority.
The event was first delayed because judges and staff—plus current and former attorneys general and present, past and possibly future governors—were attending the memorial service Tuesday for retired Georgia Supreme Court Chief Justice P. Harris Hines in the Great Hall of Marietta First Presbyterian Church.
Gov. Nathan Deal ordered flags to fly at half-staff Tuesday over all state buildings and grounds in honor of Hines, who died Nov. 4 in a car accident. The governor eulogized Hines at the funeral, as did Chief Justice Harold Melton. They both wept.
So did the skies over Georgia this week. Rain was the reason for the latest cancellation, according to Morgan Smith-Williams, public relations coordinator for the State Properties Commission and Building Authority.
But the truth was, no one was much in the mood to celebrate while grieving the chief justice who helped plan the building. The judges and justices had already decided to forgo their building event speech-making after Hines' death.
The new home for the Georgia Supreme Court and Court of Appeals has reached the halfway point in construction, and the steel frame is almost done, Smith-Williams said. That last piece of steel was to go up during the topping-out ceremony. The event was going to be a chance to celebrate for the contractor, Gilbane, and the architectural firm, Stevens & Wilkinson, as well as the courts. They had planned to attach the traditional topping-out evergreen tree to the final beam, along with Georgia and U.S. flags. Also expected were words for the construction crew from Gilbane's project manager, Michael Spivey, and lead architect, Bill Clark of Stevens & Wilkinson.
But Tuesday evening after the Hines funeral and with more rain in the forecast, the plan was scrapped.
“Construction must go on,” Smith-Williams said. But celebrating will just have to wait.
The building is the brick-and-mortar part of Deal's vision for the state's justice system—the first home for the intermediate and high appellate courts, which until now have been jammed into state office buildings with the attorney general and other departments.
Initial plans had been to open the building in August 2019. The ribbon-cutting ceremony has been pushed to December, with hopes of moving judges and their staffs in during the holiday season and opening to the public at the start of 2020, Smith-Williams said.
Thus far, the state has appropriated $122 million for the building, according to Building Authority Executive Director Steve Stancil. First came a $7.5 million outlay in 2015 for design. In 2016, the state set aside $6.5 million to demolish the abandoned Georgia Archives building that was on the site. The building authority sold $105 million worth of bonds in 2017 for the bulk of the financing. An additional $3.5 million came from a supplemental budget appropriation last year to finish the cleanup, which included removal of toxic chemicals from a dry cleaner and gas station once on the land. The plan calls for 224,000 square feet of space on a 5-acre site facing the gold dome of the Capitol.
Legislative leaders have already announced plans to name the building after the governor: the Nathan Deal Judicial Center.
As chief justice, Hines helped design and looked forward to the new building. In an interview last year, he said it will be “aesthetically striking” and “a signature building for our state.” He noted the court's current quarters are “from the Eisenhower era.”
“It's going to be a building for which the people of Georgia can be exceedingly proud,” Hines said. “And Governor Deal can be proud.”
Hines meant the statement as a tribute to the governor. But this week, the governor was paying tribute to Hines. To Helen Hines, the wife Hines called “springtime at the Masters,” Deal said, “Helen, all of Georgia mourns with you.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Fulfilled Her Purpose on the Court': Presiding Judge M. Yvette Miller Is 'Ready for a New Challenge'
8 minute readTrending Stories
- 1The Key Moves in the Reshuffling German Legal Market as 2025 Dawns
- 2Social Media Celebrities Clash in $100M Lawsuit
- 3Federal Judge Sets 2026 Admiralty Bench Trial in Baltimore Bridge Collapse Litigation
- 4Trump Media Accuses Purchaser Rep of Extortion, Harassment After Merger
- 5Judge Slashes $2M in Punitive Damages in Sober-Living Harassment Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250