Georgia Law Limited Interpreters at the Polls, New Election Lawsuit Alleges
Asian Americans Advancing Justice is asking a federal judge in Atlanta for a temporary restraining order that would stop poll workers from enforcing a Georgia law the group says violates the federal Voting Rights Act by limiting voters' use of interpreters.
November 28, 2018 at 04:40 PM
5 minute read
When 65-year-old Jin Kwon went to vote on Nov. 6, he asked interpreters with an Asian-American civil rights group to help him and his wife read the ballots they intended to cast.
Kwon, a Korean-American, has limited proficiency in English, and the federal Voting Rights Act gives people like him broad discretion in enlisting an interpreter's help to cast a ballot.
Georgia law, however, imposes greater restrictions on the use of interpreters in state and local elections. Even though a federal race was on the ballot Kwon wanted to cast, poll workers initially wouldn't allow him to use an interpreter with the Atlanta chapter of Asian-Americans Advancing Justice, according to a federal lawsuit filed Wednesday in Atlanta.
The dispute eventually pulled in a poll manager, the manager's supervisor and AAAJ's deputy director before Kwon and his wife were finally allowed to cast their ballot with an interpreter's help.
On Wednesday, Kwon and AAAJ sued acting Secretary of State Robyn Crittenden to void the state law. The suit, assigned to Judge Timothy Batten of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, also seeks a temporary restraining order that would bar poll workers from enforcing the law in the Dec. 4 runoff. Early voting has already begun.
AAAJ's legal staff has enlisted pro bono legal help from Brian Sutherland, a former ACLU voting rights lawyer now with Atlanta's Buckley Beal, and a team of attorneys from Atlanta's Alston & Bird.
Unlike the federal voting law, Georgia law currently limits interpreters assisting voters with language difficulties to those who are registered to vote in the same precinct as the person needing help or who are members of a voter's immediate family. It also limits interpreters to assisting no more than 10 people at the polls.
The federal Voting Rights Act provides far wider latitude, allowing voters with limited proficiency in English or who can't read or write their choice of an interpreter or assistant as long as the helper is not a representative of a voter's employer or a union to which they may belong.
Georgia law isn't supposed to supersede the federal Voting Rights Act as long as there is a candidate for federal office on the ballot. But the Dec. 4 runoff only includes state and local candidates, and some poll workers still tried to wrongly apply the state restrictions during the midterm election, the lawsuit contends.
Kwon said through an interpreter when the suit was announced Wednesday that neither he nor his wife understand English well. Their children live out of state and he doesn't know any other registered voters in his DeKalb County precinct who speak Korean who can help him vote. That is why he said he turned to AAAJ for an interpreter.
“Advancing Justice-Atlanta has been on the ground working with voters of color and encouraging them to be part of the civic process,” Phi Nguyen, litigation director at AAAJ, said in announcing the lawsuit. “However, language barriers persist as an obstacle for Latino-Americans and Asian-American Pacific Islanders … to meaningfully participate in this process.”
“We should be making it as easy as possible for everyone to vote, not excluding people,” she said.
Only Gwinnett County provides interpreters for voters, and that's only for Spanish, the AAAJ said. The organization estimates that more than 500,000 Georgia citizens have limited proficiency in English, most of whom are Asian-American or Latino.
Christopher Laping, a staff attorney at AAAJ in Los Angeles, called the state law “absolutely unconstitutional” and a “draconian rule that restricts the voting power of the growing populations of Latinos and Asian American Pacific Islander in Georgia by taking away the only option for language assistance for many in the state.”
The organization ran a language assistance program for voters with limited English proficiency for the November election, recruiting and training volunteers fluent in Spanish, Vietnamese, Korean, Chinese and Hindi. Voters could arrange to meet an interpreter at their polling place to assist in casting a ballot. The organization also stationed interpreters at some polling places to provide spot language assistance for voters who needed it.
The suit is not the first one AAAJ has filed challenging Georgia election laws. The organization is a plaintiff in an ongoing case challenging a state law requiring that voter registrations exactly match voter names in databases kept both by the state Department of Driver Services and the U.S. Social Security Administration.
In that case, also in Georgia's Northern District, Judge Eleanor Ross issued a temporary restraining order on Nov. 5 directing then-Secretary of State Brian Kemp—now Georgia's Republican governor-elect—to restore more than 3,000 voter registrations because they had been flagged as possible noncitizens. Most were newly-minted U.S. citizens.
The suit seeks to prohibit future application of the exact match program, which civil rights organizations contend placed more than 53,000 voter registrations—the majority of them minority voters—in limbo in the run-up to the midterm election.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All3 GOP States Join Paid Sick Leave Movement, Passing Ballot Measures by Wide Margins
5 minute readJudge Sets Early 2025 Trial for Ex-Prosecutor Charged With Meddling in Ahmaud Arbery Investigation
3 minute readFulton Reelects Willis as DA Amid Ongoing 2020 Election Case Against Trump
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Bitcoin, Cryptocurrency Practices Stand to Gain from Trump Election
- 2Judge Leaves Statute of Limitations Question in Injury Crash Suit for a Jury
- 3Fighting Injustice: Son Secures Father's Honorable Discharge From U.S. Air Force
- 4'A Giant in the Legal Community': a Fulton County Judge Has Died
- 5Will the 9th Circuit Still be Center Stage in Trump Policy Challenges?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250