A New Deal: The Business Income Tax Deduction Under the TCJA
A short-and-sweet explanation of the not-so-short-and-sweet new law: Any taxpayer that owns an interest in a pass-through entity may qualify for up to a 20 percent income tax deduction on the income of that business.
November 30, 2018 at 06:06 PM
5 minute read
The Tax Cut and Job Act of 2017, which took effect on Jan. 1, 2018, made a number of significant changes in the wonderful world of tax law. Among the exciting new changes set forth in the new regime is a brand new income tax deduction for tax-savvy business owners who own their interests in pass-through entities (i.e., partnerships, LLCs, S-corporations and sole proprietorships).
A short and sweet explanation of the not-so-short-and-sweet new law: Any taxpayer that owns an interest in a pass-through entity may qualify for up to a 20 percent income tax deduction on the income of that business.
Simple, right? In some cases, yes. In others, a resounding no. The applicable Code section (I.R.C. § 199A) treats different taxpayers differently with respect to this deduction. Whether the deduction applies at all and to what extent it applies depends on a variety of factors including the total income of the taxpayer, type of business in which the taxpayer is engaged, wages paid by the taxpayer's business and property owned by the taxpayer's business.
If you are a single, business-owning taxpayer with total income less than $157,500 or a joint filer making less than $315,000, you may take the full 20 percent deduction on income earned through the pass-through entity. For taxpayers at this income level, the deduction applies to you, regardless of the type of business in which you are engaged and irrespective of the wages your business pays to its employees or the property owned by the business.
On the other hand, if you are a single business-owning taxpayer with total income in excess of $207,500 or a joint filer making more than $415,000, whether and to what extent the deduction will apply to you will depend on the type of your business, the amount of wages your business pays to employees and the property your business owns. As a preliminary matter, if the pass-through business is engaged in what the Code defines as a “specified service” business, no deduction is available. The definition of specified service businesses generally includes businesses that perform services in the fields of health, law, accounting, financial or brokerage services, as well as professional artists and athletes. This definition means that taxpayers at this income level who own medical practices, law firms, consulting firms, etc., are out of luck when it comes to this deduction. For taxpayers at this income level that are in other, non-specified service businesses, the deduction will be reduced, and may be eliminated, based on the wages the business pays to its employees and the property it owns. The calculation related to the phase out for taxpayers at this level is quite complex. Suffice it to say – if you are a taxpayer at this income level with an interest in a pass-through entity that is not a specified service business, a discussion with your CPA or tax attorney is in order.
And finally, for the income “tweeners,” that is—the single business-owning taxpayers with total income between $157,500 and $207,500 or joint filers with income between $315,000 and $415,000—your pass-through business may be entitled to an income tax deduction, thanks to the TCJA, but you will not receive the full 20 percent deduction, thanks to the phase-in quality of the limit to the deduction which is triggered when the taxpayer's total income reaches $157,500 ($207,500 for joint filers). Again, the complexity of the deduction in light of this phase-in limit precludes a discussion in this brief article of how the phase-in limit is calculated.
A couple of caveats of the new law should also be noted:
- An owner of a pass-through entity must take into account only his or her interest (i.e., allocable share of the income, gain, deduction and loss) in determining the “qualified business income” against which the deduction may apply.
- The deduction only applies to owners of these pass-through businesses, not employees, meaning that an employee cannot take the deduction against his or her wage income.
- The deduction only applies to “qualified business income” which does not include certain investment-related income (i.e., capital gains, dividend income, interest income, etc.).
Taxpayers can claim the deduction for the first time on a 2018 federal income tax return, which, of course, is due to be filed in 2019. Unless repealed or modified, this deduction will be available until January 1, 2026. If you believe you might be entitled to this deduction, you should consult with a tax professional.
J. Scot Kirkpatrick is a shareholder in the Atlanta office of Chamberlain Hrdlicka and leads the firm's Trusts and Estates Practice. He counsels clients in a variety of tax and estate matters including planning for business owners, high net worth individuals and their families.
J. Thompson Turner is an associate in the Atlanta office of Chamberlain Hrdlicka and a member of the firm's Trusts and Estates Practice. He focuses his practice on all aspects of sophisticated estate and wealth transfer planning and estate and trust administration.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCould Everything Be Alright Without Me Knowing? The State of Professionalism Among Attorneys
Trending Stories
- 1The Key Moves in the Reshuffling German Legal Market as 2025 Dawns
- 2Social Media Celebrities Clash in $100M Lawsuit
- 3Federal Judge Sets 2026 Admiralty Bench Trial in Baltimore Bridge Collapse Litigation
- 4Trump Media Accuses Purchaser Rep of Extortion, Harassment After Merger
- 5Judge Slashes $2M in Punitive Damages in Sober-Living Harassment Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250