Young Plaintiffs Firm Butler Tobin Gives $100K to Charities That Maximize Bang for Buck
Jeb Butler and Darren Tobin said ethicist Peter Singer's TED Talk on "effective altruism" inspired them to choose charities combating malaria, parasites and poverty in the developing world to do the most good for the most people.
December 04, 2018 at 01:48 PM
4 minute read
After extensive vetting, plaintiffs firm Butler Tobin is giving away $100,000 to three charities that help people in the developing world: the Against Malaria Foundation, Evidence Action's “Deworm the World Initiative” and GiveDirectly.
That's a lot of money for the small plaintiffs firm that partners Jeb Butler and Darren Tobin, both in their mid-30s, started less than five years ago. Besides the founders, the firm has just one other lawyer, Alyssa Baskam, and three paralegals.
Butler Tobin selected charities that aid the people who need it most worldwide—and at a very low cost per person helped, Butler said. Each charity will received one-third of the $100,000.
“We want the money to do the most good for the most people,” he explained, adding that he and Tobin were inspired by Princeton applied ethics professor Peter Singer's 2013 TED talk on “effective altruism.”
Butler and Tobin said they agreed when they formed their plaintiffs firm in 2014 that they'd start giving away a percentage of the profits once they hit a certain profit threshold. They hit that mark last year. (The partners declined to specify the threshold or percentage.)
Some have assumed, they said, that the big charitable donation was prompted by the final settlement of a wrongful death case that secured an eye-popping $150 million Decatur County jury verdict against Fiat Chrysler Automobiles. Butler was co-counsel with his father, lead plaintiffs counsel James Butler Jr. of Butler Wooten & Peak, in the suit over a Jeep fuel tank that exploded after a collision and killed a 4-year-old child. The Georgia Supreme Court earlier this year upheld the trial court's denial of a new trial motion by Chrysler in exchange for the plaintiffs accepting a $40 million judgment instead, and Chrysler paid it, plus interest, in April.
But the Chrysler verdict wasn't a factor, Butler and Tobin said, because the $100,000 donation is based on their firm's 2017 income.
“We hit [the threshold] again this year, so we'll do it again next year,” Butler said.
“We are really fired up about doing this,” he added. “We wanted to make a difference in the lives of people who needed it, and we love these three organizations.”
The Against Malaria Foundation provides insecticidal mosquito nets to areas in the developing world where malaria kills thousands of people—for under $5 per net. Evidence Action provides treatments for less than 50 cents a dose against parasitic worms that infest polluted water and cause schistosomiasis, which can cause learning disabilities and delayed development.
GiveDirectly identifies families most in need and transfers cash directly to them via cellphone-linked payment services.
The charity-vetting nonprofit GiveWell ranks the three among its top nine global charities.
Butler Tobin in early July set up a webpage to announce the giving project and asked for applications from charities to help them decide the maximally beneficial way to spend the $100,000.
“We're good at being lawyers. We're not good at professional philanthropy,” Butler explained.
Butler and Tobin reviewed more than 60 applications and then asked their colleagues—Baskam and paralegals Sarah Christy, Devin Ripley and Jenny Kafer—for input on which charities the firm should choose.
“It was hard to say no to some very worthwhile organizations,” Tobin said.
Asked if it's self-serving to publicize their big donation, Tobin replied that the plaintiffs firm could get more advertising impact by spending the $100,000 directly on marketing. If people hire Butler Tobin because of its charitable contributions and those cases add to the firm's income, that will increase the amount it gives next year, he added.
“We hope to spread the 'effective altruism' idea among the Georgia legal community,” Butler said. “The effect of the money you give can be magnified or diminished by a factor of 10 depending on the charity, so it makes sense to think hard about where you give it.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSunbelt Law Firms Experienced More Moderate Growth Last Year, Alongside Some Job Cuts and Less Merger Interest
4 minute readFowler White Burnett Opens Jacksonville Office Focused on Transportation Practice
3 minute readGeorgia High Court Clarifies Time Limit for Lawyers' Breach-of-Contract Claims
6 minute readSoutheast Firm Leaders Predict Stability, Growth in Second Trump Administration
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250