Young Plaintiffs Firm Butler Tobin Gives $100K to Charities That Maximize Bang for Buck
Jeb Butler and Darren Tobin said ethicist Peter Singer's TED Talk on "effective altruism" inspired them to choose charities combating malaria, parasites and poverty in the developing world to do the most good for the most people.
December 04, 2018 at 01:48 PM
4 minute read
After extensive vetting, plaintiffs firm Butler Tobin is giving away $100,000 to three charities that help people in the developing world: the Against Malaria Foundation, Evidence Action's “Deworm the World Initiative” and GiveDirectly.
That's a lot of money for the small plaintiffs firm that partners Jeb Butler and Darren Tobin, both in their mid-30s, started less than five years ago. Besides the founders, the firm has just one other lawyer, Alyssa Baskam, and three paralegals.
Butler Tobin selected charities that aid the people who need it most worldwide—and at a very low cost per person helped, Butler said. Each charity will received one-third of the $100,000.
“We want the money to do the most good for the most people,” he explained, adding that he and Tobin were inspired by Princeton applied ethics professor Peter Singer's 2013 TED talk on “effective altruism.”
Butler and Tobin said they agreed when they formed their plaintiffs firm in 2014 that they'd start giving away a percentage of the profits once they hit a certain profit threshold. They hit that mark last year. (The partners declined to specify the threshold or percentage.)
Some have assumed, they said, that the big charitable donation was prompted by the final settlement of a wrongful death case that secured an eye-popping $150 million Decatur County jury verdict against Fiat Chrysler Automobiles. Butler was co-counsel with his father, lead plaintiffs counsel James Butler Jr. of Butler Wooten & Peak, in the suit over a Jeep fuel tank that exploded after a collision and killed a 4-year-old child. The Georgia Supreme Court earlier this year upheld the trial court's denial of a new trial motion by Chrysler in exchange for the plaintiffs accepting a $40 million judgment instead, and Chrysler paid it, plus interest, in April.
But the Chrysler verdict wasn't a factor, Butler and Tobin said, because the $100,000 donation is based on their firm's 2017 income.
“We hit [the threshold] again this year, so we'll do it again next year,” Butler said.
“We are really fired up about doing this,” he added. “We wanted to make a difference in the lives of people who needed it, and we love these three organizations.”
The Against Malaria Foundation provides insecticidal mosquito nets to areas in the developing world where malaria kills thousands of people—for under $5 per net. Evidence Action provides treatments for less than 50 cents a dose against parasitic worms that infest polluted water and cause schistosomiasis, which can cause learning disabilities and delayed development.
GiveDirectly identifies families most in need and transfers cash directly to them via cellphone-linked payment services.
The charity-vetting nonprofit GiveWell ranks the three among its top nine global charities.
Butler Tobin in early July set up a webpage to announce the giving project and asked for applications from charities to help them decide the maximally beneficial way to spend the $100,000.
“We're good at being lawyers. We're not good at professional philanthropy,” Butler explained.
Butler and Tobin reviewed more than 60 applications and then asked their colleagues—Baskam and paralegals Sarah Christy, Devin Ripley and Jenny Kafer—for input on which charities the firm should choose.
“It was hard to say no to some very worthwhile organizations,” Tobin said.
Asked if it's self-serving to publicize their big donation, Tobin replied that the plaintiffs firm could get more advertising impact by spending the $100,000 directly on marketing. If people hire Butler Tobin because of its charitable contributions and those cases add to the firm's income, that will increase the amount it gives next year, he added.
“We hope to spread the 'effective altruism' idea among the Georgia legal community,” Butler said. “The effect of the money you give can be magnified or diminished by a factor of 10 depending on the charity, so it makes sense to think hard about where you give it.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGeorgia High Court Clarifies Time Limit for Lawyers' Breach-of-Contract Claims
6 minute readSoutheast Firm Leaders Predict Stability, Growth in Second Trump Administration
4 minute readKing & Spalding Adds Veteran Antitrust Litigator From White & Case in New York
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Weil Practice Leaders Expected to Leave for Paul Weiss, Latham
- 2Senators Grill Visa, Mastercard Execs on Alleged Anti-Competitive Practices, Fees
- 3Deal Watch: Gibson Dunn, V&E, Kirkland Lead Big Energy Deals in Another Strong Week in Transactions
- 4Advisory Opinion Offers 'Road Map' for Judges Defending Against Campaign Attacks
- 5Commencement of Child Victims Act at Heart of Federal Question Posed to NY's Top Court
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250