Atlanta Partners Report They're Paid Lower, But Most Aren't Complaining
Partners in Atlanta reported making an average of $665,000 in Major, Lindsey & Africa's partner compensation survey, compared to a national average of $885,000.
December 06, 2018 at 06:10 PM
4 minute read
Atlanta big firm partners who responded to a just-released national partner pay survey make less money than the national average. Still, the majority said they were satisfied with their pay.
Average compensation was $665,000 for the 41 Atlanta partners who responded to legal recruiter Major, Lindsey & Africa's biennial survey—lower than the $885,000 in average partner pay reported nationally.
Average total compensation by city ranged from a high of $1.448 million in New York to a low of $593,000 in Minneapolis for the 13 cities plus Silicon Valley broken out in the survey.
Pay tracked closely with origination dollars. The Atlantans reported originations of $2.1 million on average, compared with average originations of $2.57 million nationally. (New York partners reported the highest originations at $4.085 million, and those in Minneapolis reported the lowest: $1.427 million.)
That said, the Atlanta partners' rates and billable hours hadn't changed much from 2016, when Major, Lindsey & Africa last conducted the pay survey. Working attorney receipts for the Atlanta cohort declined slightly from $990,000 in 2016 to $940,000.
For Atlanta, the average hourly rate was $625, up from the $620 reported in 2016. The Atlanta partners reported billing an average of 1,633 billable hours (1,634 in 2016) and 643 nonbillable ones (746 in 2016), for a total of 2,276 hours on the job per year.
Nationally, the average hourly billing rate was $718, up 5 percent from 2016. That ranged from a high of $994 in New York and $885 in Washington, to lowest rates in Philadelphia ($618) and Minneapolis ($550).
New Yorkers on average reported putting in the same amount of overall work hours as the Atlantans, but they charged more and billed more hours. In addition to their higher average $994 rate, New York partners billed 1,724 hours on average, plus put in another 560 nonbillable hours, for a total of 2,284 hours annually.
Reasonably Satisfied
While the Atlanta respondents reported pay lower than the average national pay, they said they were as happy—or unhappy—with their compensation as their national peers.
Overall, 58 percent of the Atlanta partners said they were “very or moderately satisfied” with their pay, compared with 57 percent nationally. Similarly 25 percent of the Atlantans were “slightly to very dissatisfied” with their pay—just under the 28 percent national pay dissatisfaction rate.
Major, Lindsey & Africa also asked partners how satisfied they were with being lawyers in general. Of the Atlanta partners, 59 percent were “very or moderately satisfied” with attorney life without taking their pay into consideration—and that jumped to 68 percent when factoring in pay.
That wasn't so different from the New York respondents, the survey's highest earners. Of the New Yorkers, 54 percent were “very or moderately satisfied” with their lot as attorneys without considering pay, which rose to 65 percent when taking pay into account.
Methodology
The Major, Lindsey & Africa report found that Atlanta respondents' average pay of $655,00 had dropped from $850,000 in 2016, but that could be a factor of which Atlanta partners chose to respond to the survey.
Only 41 Atlanta partners responded this year, down from 76 respondents in 2016, and 74 in 2014 (who reported average pay of $701,000).
The report was based on 1,390 responses from partners at Am Law 200, NLJ 350 or Global 100 firms. Acritas conducted the survey, and all results were confidential and anonymous.
Partners from the nation's most expensive legal markets (New York, Washington, San Francisco, Silicon Valley, Los Angeles and Chicago) responded at a higher rate, making up 601 or 43 percent of the total responses, which may also have skewed the average pay results higher.
One notable aspect of this year's partner compensation survey was the persistence, or even worsening, of the gender pay gap, but that data was not broken out by city.
The Daily Report's sibling publication The American Lawyer reports on the national pay gap findings. Notably, male partners at large U.S. firms reported earning $959,000 on average, compared with just $627,000 on average for female partners—a 53 percent difference.
The study pins much of the gap on originations. Male partners reported average originations of $2.788 million—a gain of 8 percent over 2016. That compares with $1.589 million for female partners—a decline of 8 percent from 2016.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSunbelt Law Firms Experienced More Moderate Growth Last Year, Alongside Some Job Cuts and Less Merger Interest
4 minute readFowler White Burnett Opens Jacksonville Office Focused on Transportation Practice
3 minute readGeorgia High Court Clarifies Time Limit for Lawyers' Breach-of-Contract Claims
6 minute readSoutheast Firm Leaders Predict Stability, Growth in Second Trump Administration
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Whether to Choose State or Federal Court in a Case Involving a Franchise?
- 2Am Law 200 Firms Announce Wave of D.C. Hires in White-Collar, Antitrust, Litigation Practices
- 3K&L Gates Files String of Suits Against Electronics Manufacturer's Competitors, Brightness Misrepresentations
- 4'Better of the Split': District Judge Weighs Circuit Divide in Considering Who Pays Decades-Old Medical Bill
- 5Which Georgia Courts Are Closed Today?—Here's a List
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250