11th Circuit Issues Pipeline Ruling Against Landowners
Represented by a team from Alston & Bird, Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Co. won what it called an important victory allowing it access to property while lawsuits seeking to block construction are still pending.
December 10, 2018 at 03:12 PM
4 minute read
The Transcontinental Gas Pipeline Co. and its Atlanta lawyers have won an important victory with a ruling from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit approving a 115-mile path through private property in Northwest Georgia.
“We conclude that the district court properly granted summary judgment in favor of Transcontinental on its claim for condemnation under the Natural Gas Act,” Judge Julie Carnes said in a 90-page opinion released Thursday. “We further conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in issuing a preliminary injunction granting Transcontinental immediate access to Defendants' properties conditioned on Transcontinental posting a surety bond in an amount equal to twice the appraised values of the interests condemned.”
The panel joining Carnes included Judge Jill Pryor with Judge Anne Conway of the Middle District of Florida, sitting by designation. They affirmed U.S. District Judge Eleanor Ross of the Northern District of Georgia.
W. Clay Massey of Alston & BirdWilliam Clay Massey of Alston & Bird argued for the company at oral arguments in September. His team included Nowell Berreth, Phil Sandick, Nicole DeMoss and Tony Greene. Alston & Bird deferred to the company for comment. A spokesman for Transcontinental issued a statement applauding the decision.
Transcontinental said the decision “settled or confirmed in our favor many condemnation issues with broader application” to other projects. Carnes has provided “a clear road map for deciding in our favor a wide variety of challenges that are made to our use of eminent domain under the Natural Gas Act, both in the District Courts within the Eleventh Circuit and elsewhere,” Transcontinental said.
“The Eleventh Circuit joins other U.S. Circuit Courts around the country in holding that a district court may, in appropriate circumstances, issue a preliminary injunction granting a pipeline company immediate access to property that it has an established right to condemn under the Natural Gas Act,” Transcontinental said. “Gaining immediate access is a key step in the efficient and timely construction of interstate natural gas transmission pipelines.”
The ruling came as a blow to property owners affected. They have a long list of attorneys. Donald Evans Jr. of Evans Law Firm in Cartersville took the lead at oral arguments.
“My landowners are, of course, disappointed by the Eleventh Circuit's ruling,” Evans said Friday. “It's been two years since this case was filed. The pipeline is completely built. They've been running gas through it for over a year, and my clients haven't been paid a cent for the occupation of their property. That among many other issues are real concerns when the federal court has allowed the district court discretion to override eminent domain law.”
Evans said the courts “have essentially created a judicial method of condemnation for pipeline companies that enables them to take land faster, easier and more cheaply than the United States itself could take it. He said the “delegated power these companies enjoy is greater than that of the sovereign nation itself.”
The battle goes back to 2013, when Transcontinental first began contacting land owners in the area in which the company planned to place a natural gas pipeline connecting the Gulf Coast to New York City, according to Carnes.
In 2015, Transcontinental applied to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission for a certificate of public convenience and necessity authorizing it to construct a new natural gas pipeline in northwest Georgia, as well as related facilities in Georgia, North Carolina and Virginia.
The new 115-mile lateral pipeline was planned to run from a compressor station on Transcontinental's mainline in Coweta County, Georgia, to meter stations in Murray County, near the city of Dalton. The purpose of the project was to enable Transcontinental to transport natural gas extracted from the Marcellus shale and other supply basins in the northeastern United States to customers in the Southeast and Gulf Coast, Carnes said. Transcontinental was to receive the gas at a point on its mainline in Mercer County, New Jersey, and deliver it to an interconnection with another company's pipeline in Mississippi. Along the way, Transcontinental would provide natural gas to its customers, including, through the new lateral pipeline, communities in northwest Georgia. This project, which included both the new lateral pipeline and the related facilities on Transcontinental's mainline, was called the Dalton Expansion Project.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMorgan & Morgan Litigators Flip $3.75M Jury Verdict Into $5.6M Settlement With State Farm
5 minute readMuscogee Co. Jury Returns $42M Verdict Against Garbage Company After Collision Results in Amputation
13 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Like a Life Raft: Ben Brafman Reflects on Nearly 50 Years as a Defense Attorney
- 2HSF Partner Removed Over ‘Deeply Offensive’ Tweets
- 3Another Latham Partner Heads to Sidley in London
- 4In 'Kousisis,' the DOJ Once Again Pushes the Limits of Federal Fraud Prosecutions
- 5How Kirkland Has 'Reinvented a Meaningful Aspect' of Funds Work
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250