Allstate Says No Coverage for Driver Using Personal Car for Medical Transportation Firm
Allstate said three people injured when a 72-year-old driver for Atlanta-based LogistiCare suffered a stroke and crashed were not covered because he was using the vehicle for hire at the time of the wreck.
December 12, 2018 at 01:52 PM
4 minute read
Allstate Insurance has denied coverage to three people injured when an independent contractor working for a medical transportation company suffered a stroke and hit an oncoming truck, arguing its policy with the driver excluded damages if the car was serving as a “vehicle for hire.”
The insurer's complaint said the driver was using his own vehicle to shuttle riders for Atlanta-based LogistiCare, which operates in 41 states and bills itself as the “the nation's largest provider of of non-emergency medical transportation for state governments and managed care organizations” when the accident occurred in March.
According to Allstate's complaint, LogistiCare “employs contractors to provide transportation for patients to and from medical appointments” and “does not provide vehicles for its drivers and does not provide insurance for the vehicles used for transport.”
In a statement to the Daily Report, LogistiCare said that, “while we cannot comment on pending litigation, we can confirm that LogistiCare is a broker of non-emergency medical transportation. LogistiCare does not own the transportation providers or vehicles, nor employ the drivers.”
The driver, 72-year-old Otis Heath, died within a week of the accident.
The attorney who represents the plaintiff in the underlying case, Michael Millians of Jackson R. Massey & Associates in Augusta, said he didn't think Heath died of injuries suffered in the wreck but passed away shortly afterward.
Allstate's lawyers, Fred Valz III and Brittany DeDiego of Carlock Copeland & Stair, did not respond to requests for comment.
According to Millians and court filings, Heath was on Ga. 4 in Jefferson County on the morning of March 9 when he suffered a stroke and crossed the center line, hitting the trailer of a tractor-trailer heading the other way and continuing on for more than 300 feet before coming to a stop.
Heath was carrying two passengers, Jessie Habersham and Pearl Adams, both of whom suffered injuries, as did the truck driver, Linwood Robinson.
None of their injuries were life-threatening, but Habersham was hospitalized, Millians said.
Heath, of Norwood, died March 15, according to an obituary.
The following month, Millians filed suit on Habersham's behalf in Warren County Superior Court. Millions said he did not send Allstate a demand letter prior to suing.
Allstate had the case removed to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia on Monday.
Allstate named Heath's estate, the three injured parties and LogistiCare as defendants in the declaratory judgment action. It said the deceased man carried a policy with bodily injury coverage of $100,000 person and $300,000 per incident, and $50,000 in property damage coverage.
Among the policy language was a stipulation stating: “We will not pay for any damages an insured person is legally obligated to pay because of bodily injury or property damage arising out of the use of your insured auto while used to carry persons or property for a charge, or any auto you are driving while available for hire by the public.”
“Allstate is not required to provide Respondent Otis Heath with coverage, indemnity, or a defense for bodily injury or property damage arising out of the collision because at the time of the collision, respondent was using his vehicle as an instrumentality of an automobile business,” it said.
On a section of its website soliciting transportation companies and drivers, LogistiCare says it works with a risk management and insurance company to address “challenges faced by our network in obtaining competitively priced insurance” and also seeks volunteer “community drivers.”
“You'll be helping others remain independent, hopeful, and healthier,” it says. “And we'll provide you with reimbursement for your services based on your per-trip mileage.”
The company's contracting with drivers using their personal vehicles among its means of transporting passengers seems to resemble the services of ride-sharing services such as Uber and Lyft. Both of those services, however, provide supplemental third-party insurance coverage to drivers whenever they are using the app to communicate with, pick up or deliver a passenger.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrying to Reason With Hurricane Season: Mediating First Party Property Insurance Claims
'I Thank You': Attorney Leverages Daily Report Article to Turn $42K Offer Into $600K Settlement
7 minute readFirst Came the SEC, Now Investors Raise Allegations Against Acadia Healthcare
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Aging Condo Neglect Leads to $1M Payout in Miami Beach Slip and Fall
- 2‘BiT Global Lost’: Federal Judge Won’t Stop Coinbase From Delisting wBTC Token
- 3Some Elite Universities Favor Wealthy Students in Admissions Decisions, Lawsuit Alleges
- 4Judge Asks: Should Tom Girardi Serve Sentence in a Medical Facility or Behind Bars?
- 5EPA grants California authority to ban sales of new gas cars by 2035. Action faces reversal by Trump
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250