Georgia Attorneys Will Launch 'Great Trials' Podcast
A pair of Harris Lowry Manton attorneys have teamed up to produce a weekly podcast featuring some of the nation's top plaintiffs lawyers.
December 20, 2018 at 05:49 PM
4 minute read
(Correction noted below)
Savannah trial lawyer Stephen Lowry calls himself a “huge podcast fan” who dreamed of producing one himself.
“I run a lot and listen to a lot of podcasts while I run,” he said. “I got to thinking that it would be really interesting to have a podcast where you talk to trial lawyers about the trials they have had, how they won them, what their strategy was.”
So, Lowry, a partner at Harris Lowry Manton, decided to just do it. He teamed up with Yvonne Godfrey, an associate at the firm's Atlanta offices, to produce what the duo hopes will be a weekly podcast on America's greatest trials.
The Great Trials Podcast makes its debut Jan. 1, and Lowry said he and Godfrey already have more than two dozen ready for release. The podcasts are free and available through iTunes, Spotify, Google Play or the duo's website. He and Godfrey say they hope to produce a new one every week. “The first year, in theory, we will have 52 shows,” he said.
Lowry said the podcasts—which have so far featured interviews solely with plaintiffs lawyers like himself and Godfrey—are about an hour long. “We pick one case to talk about,” he said. “I won't say we would never have a defense lawyer on. I think that would make for some interesting podcasts. But we haven't had one yet.”
Each podcast is presented as a conversation, he said. “We don't do much editing.”
Godfrey said she and Lowry approach their interviews differently. Lowry wants to know nuts-and-bolts questions like how other lawyers handle voir dire, how long jury selection lasted, how to deal with apportionment of responsibility questions, what sort of exhibits or illustrations other lawyers use in making their cases, “all the hurdles” they faced. Godfrey said she is interested in lawyers' individual styles, how they relate to a jury, who their mentors were.
Lowry said that, so far, he and Godfrey have picked the lawyers they wanted to interview and let them select a case they wanted to talk about.
“It's been cool,” Godfrey said. “A lot of them have a case they really want to discuss, a case that really meant a lot to them or that was different or unusual. Sometimes it's a case we expect; sometimes it's not.”
“It's something we really enjoy, talking to all these lawyers from all over the country, their different strategies, the difficulties they faced,” Lowry echoed. “It's an opportunity to talk to really great lawyers. … You talk to people who really fought hard for their clients. You always leave them feeling kind of inspired. ”
“We are obviously very strong believers in the civil jury system and trying cases to a jury,” Lowry added. “A lot of these cases show the importance of that and show the strength of our trial system. That's obviously important to us. But, at the end of the day, we really just enjoy talking and learning from other lawyers.”
Some of the podcasts include:
- Atlanta attorney Adam Malone and his father, Tommy Malone, on Yamada v. Northside Hospital, a $16.5 million medical negligence verdict.
- Jeff Harris and Andy Sherffius of Atlanta's Harris Lowry Manton on Sasser v. Ford, $47.7 million.
- Atlanta attorney Laura Shamp, Engle progeny tobacco litigation.
- Russ Herman, of Herman, Herman & Katz in New Orleans, Scott v. American Tobacco, $591 million.
- John E. Parker and Ronnie Crosby, of South Carolina firm Peters, Murdaugh, Parker, Eltzroth & Detrick, Murphy v. Jefferson Pilot Communications Co., a defamation case on behalf of two attorneys against a local television station.
- Albuquerque attorney Randi McGinn, Sowards v. Biotronik, $67 million;
- Palm Beach attorney John Romano, Adams v. the Imported Car Store, $28.5 million.
- Des Moines attorney Roxanne Conlin, McFarland v. Rieper, $3.25 million after an adopted son was reclaimed by his father and then slain.
Editor's note: The initial version of this story misstated that Tommy Malone died in February. He is alive and living in Florida. The Daily Report regrets this error.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBig Law Practice Leaders 'Bullish' That Second Trump Presidency Will Be Good for Business
3 minute readBig Law Lawyers Fan Out for Election Day Volunteering in Call Centers and Litigation
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250