State Representative Sues a Second Time to Void Election
The petition asks a judge to invalidate the Dec. 4 results and order another new election for a Republican primary.
December 20, 2018 at 04:03 PM
4 minute read
Allegations of election irregularities in Georgia House District 28 that prompted a judge to void the results and call a new election for Dec. 4 have resurfaced, prompting a second lawsuit by state Rep. Dan Gasaway.
Gasaway, R-Homer, who lost the Dec. 4 race to opponent Chris Erwin by two votes, filed a petition in Banks County Superior Court Wednesday contesting the results after losing the race for the second time. The petition asks a judge to invalidate the Dec. 4 results and order another new election. It was filed 24 hours after a recount resulted in the same two-vote margin in Erwin's favor.
“There were illegal votes cast that exceed the margin of victory in the election,” said Gasaway's attorney, Jake Evans of the Atlanta offices of Holland & Knight. “Our position at this point is that this is an issue that is bigger than Dan Gasaway. It's bigger than Chris Erwin. It's an issue that reflects on the integrity of the electoral system. It's necessary to instill public confidence that the elections are properly done.”
Erwin's attorney, Bryan Tyson of Atlanta's Strickland Brockington Lewis, said the campaign is confident it can establish that Gasaway's complaint identified as nonresidents of the district did vote legally in the Dec. 4 election and are all residents of Banks County. Banks County is entirely within District 28, he said.
“Our view is that … it's turning into sour grapes at this point,” Tyson said. Gasaway “lost the election twice. It's a waste of taxpayer dollars at this point. Rep. elect Erwin is ready to begin serving the district when the [legislative] session convenes in a couple of weeks.”
The petition names as defendants Erwin and the Habersham, Banks and Stephens county election boards. The counties are in the North Georgia mountains.
The suit claims that election personnel accepted improper votes while wrongly rejecting other votes in at least 17 instances—enough under state law to place the results in doubt and pave the way for a new election. Three voters who, according to Gasaway, improperly cast ballots were Banks County Sheriff Billy Carlton Speed, his wife and son. The suit contends that Speed and his family live in House District 32, not District 28.
Speed was in a meeting Thursday and couldn't be reached for comment. But the sheriff posted an official statement on his Facebook page Thursday, calling Gasaway's lawsuit “frivolous.” He also took issue with the suggestion that he and his family live in another county and voted illegally in Banks.
“The land and house that we reside in and own is located solely in Banks County,” he said. ”My residential status is supported by official tax documents, Banks County GIS mapping department records, and all business conducted through my personal accounts. Unfortunately, Google Maps doesn't put my residence in Banks County.”
“Google Maps will be the first to state that it is an unofficial source of information. As most of us know, we don't believe everything that we read on the Internet.”
“As in every election, I walked into the Banks County Elections Office this year and presented my driver's license to the registrar,” the sheriff continued. ”I watched as my license was checked against the voter eligibility roll for verification and even signed the prepared documentation. The registrar handed me an electronic ballot and I conducted my duty as a voting citizen.”
Gasaway is a three-term incumbent who lost to Erwin by 67 votes in the May primaries. But Gasaway soon learned that at least 71 people in his district were given the wrong ballot and that his race did not appear on them. Habersham County election officials eventually notified a total of 388 registered voters they were erroneously placed in the wrong district.
After a bench trial last September, a senior judge in Banks County invalidated the May 22 Republican primary and ordered a Dec. 4 do-over, saying there was sufficient evidence to place the results in doubt.
There was no Democratic candidate, so the winner of the Republican primary will become the district's state representative.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFowler White Burnett Opens Jacksonville Office Focused on Transportation Practice
3 minute readOn The Move: Polsinelli Adds Health Care Litigator in Nashville, Ex-SEC Enforcer Joins BCLP in Atlanta
6 minute readWoman's Suit Alleging Negligence to Sex Trafficking by Hotel Tossed by Federal Judge
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250