State Representative Sues a Second Time to Void Election
The petition asks a judge to invalidate the Dec. 4 results and order another new election for a Republican primary.
December 20, 2018 at 04:03 PM
4 minute read
Allegations of election irregularities in Georgia House District 28 that prompted a judge to void the results and call a new election for Dec. 4 have resurfaced, prompting a second lawsuit by state Rep. Dan Gasaway.
Gasaway, R-Homer, who lost the Dec. 4 race to opponent Chris Erwin by two votes, filed a petition in Banks County Superior Court Wednesday contesting the results after losing the race for the second time. The petition asks a judge to invalidate the Dec. 4 results and order another new election. It was filed 24 hours after a recount resulted in the same two-vote margin in Erwin's favor.
“There were illegal votes cast that exceed the margin of victory in the election,” said Gasaway's attorney, Jake Evans of the Atlanta offices of Holland & Knight. “Our position at this point is that this is an issue that is bigger than Dan Gasaway. It's bigger than Chris Erwin. It's an issue that reflects on the integrity of the electoral system. It's necessary to instill public confidence that the elections are properly done.”
Erwin's attorney, Bryan Tyson of Atlanta's Strickland Brockington Lewis, said the campaign is confident it can establish that Gasaway's complaint identified as nonresidents of the district did vote legally in the Dec. 4 election and are all residents of Banks County. Banks County is entirely within District 28, he said.
“Our view is that … it's turning into sour grapes at this point,” Tyson said. Gasaway “lost the election twice. It's a waste of taxpayer dollars at this point. Rep. elect Erwin is ready to begin serving the district when the [legislative] session convenes in a couple of weeks.”
The petition names as defendants Erwin and the Habersham, Banks and Stephens county election boards. The counties are in the North Georgia mountains.
The suit claims that election personnel accepted improper votes while wrongly rejecting other votes in at least 17 instances—enough under state law to place the results in doubt and pave the way for a new election. Three voters who, according to Gasaway, improperly cast ballots were Banks County Sheriff Billy Carlton Speed, his wife and son. The suit contends that Speed and his family live in House District 32, not District 28.
Speed was in a meeting Thursday and couldn't be reached for comment. But the sheriff posted an official statement on his Facebook page Thursday, calling Gasaway's lawsuit “frivolous.” He also took issue with the suggestion that he and his family live in another county and voted illegally in Banks.
“The land and house that we reside in and own is located solely in Banks County,” he said. ”My residential status is supported by official tax documents, Banks County GIS mapping department records, and all business conducted through my personal accounts. Unfortunately, Google Maps doesn't put my residence in Banks County.”
“Google Maps will be the first to state that it is an unofficial source of information. As most of us know, we don't believe everything that we read on the Internet.”
“As in every election, I walked into the Banks County Elections Office this year and presented my driver's license to the registrar,” the sheriff continued. ”I watched as my license was checked against the voter eligibility roll for verification and even signed the prepared documentation. The registrar handed me an electronic ballot and I conducted my duty as a voting citizen.”
Gasaway is a three-term incumbent who lost to Erwin by 67 votes in the May primaries. But Gasaway soon learned that at least 71 people in his district were given the wrong ballot and that his race did not appear on them. Habersham County election officials eventually notified a total of 388 registered voters they were erroneously placed in the wrong district.
After a bench trial last September, a senior judge in Banks County invalidated the May 22 Republican primary and ordered a Dec. 4 do-over, saying there was sufficient evidence to place the results in doubt.
There was no Democratic candidate, so the winner of the Republican primary will become the district's state representative.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLaw Firms Expand Scope of Immigration Expertise Amid Blitz of Trump Orders
6 minute readBass Berry & Sims Relocates to Nashville Office Designed to Encourage Collaboration, Inclusion
4 minute readGunderson Dettmer Opens Atlanta Office With 3 Partners From Morris Manning
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250