Federal Courts in Ga. Continue Operations as Shutdown Continues
The federal courts have funds to operate at full staff through Jan. 11.
January 03, 2019 at 03:36 PM
4 minute read
Federal courts in the Northern District of Georgia have sufficient funds to operate fully staffed until Jan. 11 despite the ongoing shutdown, a district court official said Wednesday.
The court will remain open and operation after that date if the government shutdown continues, said court executive James Hatten. The courts are using court fee balances and other funds not dependent on a new appropriations bill to stay operational.
“It's just a matter of what staff will be here,” Hatten said. “The staff that will be here … will be working in anticipation of pay but not receiving it.”
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit in Atlanta also remains open. It has posted a notice to that effect on its website, adding that all filing deadlines remain in effect and that PACER remains functional.
Kate Adams, an attorney adviser in the circuit executive's office, referred The Daily Report to the website notice. Lawyers with cases affected by the shutdown are negotiating with the appeals court “on an individual basis,” she said in an email. The court will not announce any further plans regarding the shutdown unless it continues past Jan. 11.
Meanwhile, the office of the U.S. attorney for the Northern District of Georgia is functioning at about 60 percent capacity, said U.S. Attorney Byung J. “BJay” Pak. Because the lapse in funding occurred during the holiday season, Pak said, “We really haven't seen too much of an impact. There are a lot of people who have been on vacation.”
But he said the shutdown has delayed all civil cases—including forfeitures and representation of federal agencies in litigation—normally handled by the civil lawyers and their support staff. Pak said he asked the judges to stay civil cases handled by his office until the furlough is over. Pending criminal cases will go forward as usual.
“All the judges have been very receptive and accommodating,” he said. But, he added, “Whatever the court wants to address, we do it, regardless of a lapse in funding.”
On Dec. 26, Chief Judge Thomas Thrash issued an administrative order staying civil proceedings where the federal government, federal agencies, officers and employees are parties or where the U.S. attorney or members of his legal team are counsel of record until appropriations are restored.
Thrash also ordered that deadlines in any civil case affected by the shutdown be automatically extended by the number of shutdown days.
Pak said he has “fantastic men and women” in his office, many of whom have volunteered to be furloughed on a rotation basis so no single group or section bears the brunt of the funding lapse. Those who continue to work are doing so without pay for now, he said. “We are going to do what's necessary … to keep the public safe.”
“It's about mission first here,” Pak continued. “Obviously, I am very humbled by the tremendous amount of dedication shown.”
Hatten said the court is already planning operations if the shutdown extends past Jan. 11.
“All judges are essential, of course,” he said.
Regarding support staff, he said it's difficult to say someone is not essential, since support staff is already lean. Only two people are assigned to handle juries, and each judge is assigned a single courtroom deputy.
“Many courts have determined in the past that all staff is essential,” Hatten said. “Our court could do that as well.”
“I assure you the courts will remain open for business and doing business up to and including Jan. 11 and beyond. We will have enough people to support them.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLaw Firms Expand Scope of Immigration Expertise Amid Blitz of Trump Orders
6 minute readBass Berry & Sims Relocates to Nashville Office Designed to Encourage Collaboration, Inclusion
4 minute readGunderson Dettmer Opens Atlanta Office With 3 Partners From Morris Manning
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250