State Bar Mulls Rule on Purchase, Disclosure of Legal Malpractice Insurance
Georgia is one of many states that have no rules governing whether lawyers must purchase professional liability insurance or if that information must be disclosed. A State Bar of Georgia study committee may change that.
January 04, 2019 at 03:01 PM
5 minute read
For years, Georgia attorneys specializing in legal malpractice cases have complained that too many of their fellow lawyers are placing themselves and their clients at risk by failing to maintain professional liability insurance.
Georgia is one of several states with no requirement that lawyers carry insurance or disclose that fact to the public. Now, the State Bar of Georgia is taking steps toward understanding how pervasive the problem is, with a a study committee of more than a dozen lawyers from around the state set to meet Monday to take up the issue.
Bar President Ken Hodges said malpractice lawyers reporting that the problem was relatively pervasive in Georgia spurred him to call for the creation of a committee that ultimately will present its finding to the bar's Board of Governors.
“I don't know how many lawyers have [malpractice insurance] or don't,” said Hodges. “But we are a self-regulating profession, and, if we don't enact rules and rules and procedures to protect the public, we're not doing our job.”
“Personally, I think not carrying it is irresponsible, and I can't imagine practicing law without it,” noted Hodges, who has just shuttered his own firm, Ken Hodges Law, as he prepares to be sworn in as a judge on the state Court of Appeals later this month. “At a minimum, I think lawyers need to disclose whether they're carrying insurance or not, so people can decide whether they want to hire them.”
According to the American Bar Association, as of 2018, more than a dozen states, including Georgia, do not require insurance or any sort of disclosure to the public or the state bar associations. Several states require that lawyers disclose whether they carry insurance to the bar and/or to clients, and some post that information on their state bar websites. Only Idaho and Oregon require that private attorneys carry malpractice insurance.
Linley Jones Firm principal Linley Jones, a member of the subcommittee who has won judgments against lawyers who lacked the resources to pay them, has been advocating for years to have the bar address the issue.
“There is a general agreement that there is a problem with uninsured lawyers and that something needs to be done,” she said, although attempts to remedy the situation have gone nowhere.
“My general impression, as a result of my 20-plus year effort to encourage the state bar to take steps to help the victims of uninsured lawyers, is that such efforts have not been well received,” Jones said. She also noted that the committee wants to push forward, now that the subject is on the table.
“We've had one meeting, a general discussion about the initial topic. Now we need to move,” Jones added. “We're on an aggressive schedule to get something to the Board of Governors by the time for their spring meeting.”
Other members of the committee include state bar General Counsel Paula Frederick and Deputy GCs Bill NeSmith and Jenny Mittelman, along with Ellis, Painter, Ratterree & Adams partner Sarah Akins; Georgia Trial Lawyers Association director of political affairs Bill Clark; Naggiar & Sarif attorney William Davis; Hall Booth Smith partner Michael Frick; Warren Hinds P.C. principal Warren Hinds; Lefkowitz Firm principal David Lefkowitz; Hawkins Parnell & Young partner Christine Mast; Cruser, Mitchell, Novitz, Sanchez, Gaston & Zimet partner Bill Mitchell; Carlock Copeland & Stair partner Shannon Sprinkle and Werdesheim Law Firm principal Pete Werdesheim.
Hodges said that, in his conversations with lawyers, he's never heard any sound rationale for a lawyer not to carry malpractice coverage.
“The only argument I've ever heard is, 'I can't afford it,' which I don't think is a good argument,” he said. “It cost me about $3,500 a year for my whole office at Ken Hodges Law, and that's not much to ensure that my clients are protected if somebody makes a mistake.”
“Of course it's in the lawyers' interest, too,” Hodges added. “If a lawyer gets hit with claim, he or she should not represent themselves; they need to hire counsel. If a lawyer tells me me they don't have the money to spend on insurance, I say 'You'll spend a lot more on the time defending a malpractice claim that you could have generated on your practice.'”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllA Look Back at High-Profile Hires in Big Law From Federal Government
4 minute readOn the Move: Hunton Andrews Kurth Practice Leader Named Charlotte Managing Partner
6 minute readHusch Blackwell, Foley Among Law Firms Opening Southeast Offices This Year
9 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250