Kilpatrick Launches Beijing Office to Expand Global Trademark Practice
Chris Woods, who is relocating to Beijing to open the office, said the firm needs to be on the ground to meet the growing brand market.
January 14, 2019 at 02:50 PM
4 minute read
Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton has opened an office in Beijing to serve clients' trademark needs in China, which is rapidly becoming the world's biggest market for brands.
The office, which launched Jan. 1, builds off Kilpatrick's marquee trademark law practice, one of the largest among big firms.
“We felt we needed to be on the ground in China,” said Chris Woods, who heads Kilpatrick's China brands team and is relocating from New York to open the Beijing location.
The Beijing office, located in the city's central business district of Chaoyang, will predominantly serve U.S. and European clients with Chinese subsidiaries, Woods said, as well as Chinese companies developing their own brands.
“China is probably the most important market in the world,” by size and value, he said. And many decisions that clients make about protecting and promoting their brands in China are now done locally, not from the United States or Europe, he added.
“We've always worked very closely with U.S. in-house counsel,” Woods said. “About 18 months ago, we decided we need a parallel practice in China.”
Woods, who opened Kilpatrick's New York office in 2004, spoke to the Daily Report from the airport in New York on the way to Beijing. Shuang Yu, an associate, and Qunfan Chen, a trademark agent, are relocating to Beijing with Woods.
This is not Kilpatrick's first foray into Asia. The firm opened a Shanghai office in 2012 that is more broadly focused on intellectual property law, including patent protection. It also has a Tokyo office, gained from the 2011 merger of Atlanta-based Kilpatrick Stockton with San Francisco-based Townsend and Townsend and Crews.
But China's major government agencies, including its trademark registration agency and intellectual property court, are in Beijing, said Kilpatrick's chair, Henry Walker IV.
“We represent some of the premier brands in the world,” Walker added. “To be able to offer a global solution for clients' branding issues, we need capability in China.”
China's trademark registration office has greatly expanded in the past decade as the market has evolved, Woods said. “China is the largest trademark-filing country by far now, so the need to build relationships with the trademark office and the trademark adjudication office is really important.”
|Largest Brand Market
InterContinental Hotels Group, a Kilpatrick client, is an example of the firm's work in China, Woods said. “It is listed in Britain with extensive U.S. assets, and it's growing fast in China.” IHG owns a multitude of hotel brands, including Holiday Inn, Crowne Plaza and Indigo, he said, and it has developed a stand-alone Chinese brand, Hualuxe, which its website calls “the first upscale international brand designed specifically for Chinese guests.”
Brand protection in China is more complex than registering a trademark and then fending off infringements, Woods said. Local brands are not as developed as Western ones, and there are different rules for registering trademarks and protecting them.
“Chinese companies are good at developing technology but not so good at developing brands—and brands are what sells the product,” Woods said, adding that helping Chinese companies bridge these differences in thinking is part of what Kilpatrick's trademark team helps to accomplish.
The firm is working on brand strategy and protection for some Chinese companies making products with far more advanced technology than their Western equivalents, Woods said, such as a refrigerator that can track its contents and order more as needed.
Even U.S. companies with established brands must figure out a registrable trademark, as far as logo, design and words, that also works in the Chinese market, he said. China recognizes far broader trademark usages than in the U.S., so there are plenty of opportunities to infringe, he said.
“Many U.S. trademarks are registered very weakly in China, based on what they have in the United States,” Woods said.
China recognizes first to file, not first to use for marks. As a result, he said, enterprising businesspeople in China have speculatively registered existing trademarks from foreign markets.
“Part of what we do is try and get the mark back,” Woods said, adding that many companies have paid more than $1 million to recapture their marks in China.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllOn the Move: Hunton Andrews Kurth Practice Leader Named Charlotte Managing Partner
6 minute readHusch Blackwell, Foley Among Law Firms Opening Southeast Offices This Year
9 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250