Macon Man Wins $817K Verdict After $250K Policy Limit Demand
The winning lawyer had been turned down for a $250,000 policy limit demand and offer of judgment. She will seek the full verdict plus interest and attorney's fees.
January 25, 2019 at 01:58 PM
3 minute read
Macon lawyer Katherine McArthur won an $817,500 verdict last week in a trial that followed a $250,000 State Farm insurance policy limit demand for injuries from a car crash.
McArthur said Thursday the best pretrial offer from the defense was $125,000. She said the defense attorney told the jury that $125,000 to $175,000 would be fair. Defense experts suggested the plaintiff's back and hip injuries—which had resulted in one surgery and would likely require another—weren't really caused by the wreck but were the result of disc degeneration and arthritis.
“The jury didn't buy that,” McArthur said. “I think it hurt the defense to stick their heads in the sand.”
The defense attorney was J. Christopher Wolfe of Chambless Higdon Richardson Katz & Griggs in Macon. Wolfe could not be reached for comment.
McArthur tried the case with D. Jordan Josey Jr., also of the McArthur Law Firm.
The McArthur firm represented Curtis McGhee, who was 54 on the day of the crash, April 1, 2011. He was driving his 2004 Chrysler Sebring sedan east in the left lane of Mulberry Street in downtown Macon. The defendant, John Ryan, was driving a 2001 Chrysler Voyager minivan east in the right lane of Mulberry Street.
The crash happened as Ryan attempted to change lanes. The defense summary said Ryan checked for other cars first, but then hit the corner of the Sebring. McArthur said Ryan failed to check his blind spot first and appeared to be exceeding the 25 mph speed limit. Her demand letter to State Farm said McGhee suffered back and hip pain, among other injuries, and was unable to work for nearly two years. Because he was self-employed with his own cleaning business, he lost all his income, the suit claimed.
The trial before Bibb County State Court Judge Jeffery Monroe took 3½ days, McArthur said. The jury deliberated about two hours before returning a verdict of $817,500.
The jury awarded: $120,000 for past medical expenses; $85,000 for future medical expenses to cover the second surgery McGhee's doctors recommended; $300,000 for past pain and suffering; $250,000 for future pain and suffering; $25,000 for lost income; $35,000 for loss of consortium for McGhee's wife; and $2,500 for future loss of consortium.
McArthur said there also was $1 million in excess coverage, so she hopes to recover the full judgment. She also said she plans to seek interest and attorney fees through an offer of judgment she made before trial.
She attributed the win to McGhee, saying, “It always takes a nice, honest client.”
The case is Curtis McGhee and Denise McGhee v. John Ryan Jr., No. 81072.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTurning the Tables: Defense Litigators Embrace Lawsuits, Alleging Fraud at Plaintiffs Shops
6 minute readAfter 37 Years at Geico, 7 as CLO, Seth Ingall Takes Legal Post Elsewhere
2 minute readMcGuireWoods Adds 11 Attorneys From Boutique to Century City Insurance Recovery Team
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Dechert partners Andrew J. Levander, Angela M. Liu and Neil A. Steiner have stepped in to defend Arbor Realty Trust and certain executives in a pending securities class action. The complaint, filed July 31 in New York Eastern District Court by Levi & Korsinsky, contends that the defendants concealed a 'toxic' mobile home portfolio, vastly overstated collateral in regards to the company's loans and failed to disclose an investigation of the company by the FBI. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Pamela K. Chen, is 1:24-cv-05347, Martin v. Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Arthur G. Jakoby, Ryan Feeney and Maxim M.L. Nowak from Herrick Feinstein have stepped in to defend Charles Dilluvio and Seacor Capital in a pending securities lawsuit. The complaint, filed Sept. 30 in New York Southern District Court by the Securities and Exchange Commission, accuses the defendants of using consulting agreements, attorney opinion letters and other mechanisms to skirt regulations limiting stock sales by affiliate companies and allowing the defendants to unlawfully profit from sales of Enzolytics stock. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Andrew L. Carter Jr., is 1:24-cv-07362, Securities and Exchange Commission v. Zhabilov et al.
Who Got The Work
Clark Hill members Vincent Roskovensky and Kevin B. Watson have entered appearances for Architectural Steel and Associated Products in a pending environmental lawsuit. The complaint, filed Aug. 27 in Pennsylvania Eastern District Court by Brodsky & Smith on behalf of Hung Trinh, accuses the defendant of discharging polluted stormwater from its steel facility without a permit in violation of the Clean Water Act. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Gerald J. Pappert, is 2:24-cv-04490, Trinh v. Architectural Steel And Associated Products, Inc.
Who Got The Work
Michael R. Yellin of Cole Schotz has entered an appearance for S2 d/b/a the Shoe Surgeon, Dominic Chambrone a/k/a Dominic Ciambrone and other defendants in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The case, filed July 15 in New York Southern District Court by DLA Piper on behalf of Nike, seeks to enjoin Ciambrone and the other defendants in their attempts to build an 'entire multifaceted' retail empire through their unauthorized use of Nike’s trademark rights. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald, is 1:24-cv-05307, Nike Inc. v. S2, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Sullivan & Cromwell partner Adam S. Paris has entered an appearance for Orthofix Medical in a pending securities class action arising from a proposed acquisition of SeaSpine by Orthofix. The suit, filed Sept. 6 in California Southern District Court, by Girard Sharp and the Hall Firm, contends that the offering materials and related oral communications contained untrue statements of material fact. According to the complaint, the defendants made a series of misrepresentations about Orthofix’s disclosure controls and internal controls over financial reporting and ethical compliance. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Linda Lopez, is 3:24-cv-01593, O'Hara v. Orthofix Medical Inc. et al.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250