Macon Man Wins $817K Verdict After $250K Policy Limit Demand
The winning lawyer had been turned down for a $250,000 policy limit demand and offer of judgment. She will seek the full verdict plus interest and attorney's fees.
January 25, 2019 at 01:58 PM
3 minute read
Macon lawyer Katherine McArthur won an $817,500 verdict last week in a trial that followed a $250,000 State Farm insurance policy limit demand for injuries from a car crash.
McArthur said Thursday the best pretrial offer from the defense was $125,000. She said the defense attorney told the jury that $125,000 to $175,000 would be fair. Defense experts suggested the plaintiff's back and hip injuries—which had resulted in one surgery and would likely require another—weren't really caused by the wreck but were the result of disc degeneration and arthritis.
“The jury didn't buy that,” McArthur said. “I think it hurt the defense to stick their heads in the sand.”
The defense attorney was J. Christopher Wolfe of Chambless Higdon Richardson Katz & Griggs in Macon. Wolfe could not be reached for comment.
McArthur tried the case with D. Jordan Josey Jr., also of the McArthur Law Firm.
The McArthur firm represented Curtis McGhee, who was 54 on the day of the crash, April 1, 2011. He was driving his 2004 Chrysler Sebring sedan east in the left lane of Mulberry Street in downtown Macon. The defendant, John Ryan, was driving a 2001 Chrysler Voyager minivan east in the right lane of Mulberry Street.
The crash happened as Ryan attempted to change lanes. The defense summary said Ryan checked for other cars first, but then hit the corner of the Sebring. McArthur said Ryan failed to check his blind spot first and appeared to be exceeding the 25 mph speed limit. Her demand letter to State Farm said McGhee suffered back and hip pain, among other injuries, and was unable to work for nearly two years. Because he was self-employed with his own cleaning business, he lost all his income, the suit claimed.
The trial before Bibb County State Court Judge Jeffery Monroe took 3½ days, McArthur said. The jury deliberated about two hours before returning a verdict of $817,500.
The jury awarded: $120,000 for past medical expenses; $85,000 for future medical expenses to cover the second surgery McGhee's doctors recommended; $300,000 for past pain and suffering; $250,000 for future pain and suffering; $25,000 for lost income; $35,000 for loss of consortium for McGhee's wife; and $2,500 for future loss of consortium.
McArthur said there also was $1 million in excess coverage, so she hopes to recover the full judgment. She also said she plans to seek interest and attorney fees through an offer of judgment she made before trial.
She attributed the win to McGhee, saying, “It always takes a nice, honest client.”
The case is Curtis McGhee and Denise McGhee v. John Ryan Jr., No. 81072.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllInsurer Not Required to Cover $29M Wrongful Death Judgment, Appeals Court Rules
Trying to Reason With Hurricane Season: Mediating First Party Property Insurance Claims
'I Thank You': Attorney Leverages Daily Report Article to Turn $42K Offer Into $600K Settlement
7 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250