Macon Man Wins $817K Verdict After $250K Policy Limit Demand
The winning lawyer had been turned down for a $250,000 policy limit demand and offer of judgment. She will seek the full verdict plus interest and attorney's fees.
January 25, 2019 at 01:58 PM
3 minute read
Macon lawyer Katherine McArthur won an $817,500 verdict last week in a trial that followed a $250,000 State Farm insurance policy limit demand for injuries from a car crash.
McArthur said Thursday the best pretrial offer from the defense was $125,000. She said the defense attorney told the jury that $125,000 to $175,000 would be fair. Defense experts suggested the plaintiff's back and hip injuries—which had resulted in one surgery and would likely require another—weren't really caused by the wreck but were the result of disc degeneration and arthritis.
“The jury didn't buy that,” McArthur said. “I think it hurt the defense to stick their heads in the sand.”
The defense attorney was J. Christopher Wolfe of Chambless Higdon Richardson Katz & Griggs in Macon. Wolfe could not be reached for comment.
McArthur tried the case with D. Jordan Josey Jr., also of the McArthur Law Firm.
The McArthur firm represented Curtis McGhee, who was 54 on the day of the crash, April 1, 2011. He was driving his 2004 Chrysler Sebring sedan east in the left lane of Mulberry Street in downtown Macon. The defendant, John Ryan, was driving a 2001 Chrysler Voyager minivan east in the right lane of Mulberry Street.
The crash happened as Ryan attempted to change lanes. The defense summary said Ryan checked for other cars first, but then hit the corner of the Sebring. McArthur said Ryan failed to check his blind spot first and appeared to be exceeding the 25 mph speed limit. Her demand letter to State Farm said McGhee suffered back and hip pain, among other injuries, and was unable to work for nearly two years. Because he was self-employed with his own cleaning business, he lost all his income, the suit claimed.
The trial before Bibb County State Court Judge Jeffery Monroe took 3½ days, McArthur said. The jury deliberated about two hours before returning a verdict of $817,500.
The jury awarded: $120,000 for past medical expenses; $85,000 for future medical expenses to cover the second surgery McGhee's doctors recommended; $300,000 for past pain and suffering; $250,000 for future pain and suffering; $25,000 for lost income; $35,000 for loss of consortium for McGhee's wife; and $2,500 for future loss of consortium.
McArthur said there also was $1 million in excess coverage, so she hopes to recover the full judgment. She also said she plans to seek interest and attorney fees through an offer of judgment she made before trial.
She attributed the win to McGhee, saying, “It always takes a nice, honest client.”
The case is Curtis McGhee and Denise McGhee v. John Ryan Jr., No. 81072.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrying to Reason With Hurricane Season: Mediating First Party Property Insurance Claims
'I Thank You': Attorney Leverages Daily Report Article to Turn $42K Offer Into $600K Settlement
7 minute readFirst Came the SEC, Now Investors Raise Allegations Against Acadia Healthcare
4 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250