Photographer Accuses Attorney General's Campaign of Copyright Infringement
A professional photographer is suing the campaign of Georgia Attorney General Chris Carr, claiming that the campaign of the state's top legal officer used a photograph without securing permission or a licensing agreement. Another photographer has a similar infringement suit pending against Gov. Brian Kemp's campaign.
January 28, 2019 at 05:43 PM
4 minute read
A second professional photographer has filed a copyright infringement lawsuit stemming from the 2018 midterm election elections—this one against the state attorney general's campaign.
Photographer Michael Schwarz sued Friends of Chris Carr in federal court in Atlanta, claiming that a copyrighted photograph he shot of Carr's opponent, Charlie Bailey, was used without his permission in a campaign video promoting the attorney general's re-election. The suit was filed Jan. 18.
Schwarz registered the photograph copyright on Oct. 31—the day the Carr video containing Schwarz's photo appeared online, according to the complaint. Federal copyright law allows for statutory damages as high as $150,000 for each infringement. In addition to damages, Schwarz seeks attorney fees and legal costs.
Schwarz, based in Atlanta, has published photos in USA Today, Fortune, Sports Illustrated, Time, Newsweek, Life, National Geographic, The New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Businessweek and Forbes, according to his website. His corporate clients have included The Home Depot, UPS, Nike, The Coca-Cola Co., Harvard University, Brown University, Georgia Tech, and The Carter Center.
Schwarz co-counsel Joel Rothman of SRIPLaw in Boca Raton, Florida, referred requests to his co-counsel, Long Island photographer-attorney Richard Liebowitz, who could not be reached for comment. Liebowitz has filed more than 600 copyright infringement lawsuits for photographers who claimed their images were misappropriated and published without permission, according to online magazine Slate, which dubbed him “the copyright enforcer.”
On Monday, Atlanta attorney Doug Chalmers, a managing member of Chalmers & Adams and counsel to Carr's campaign, said in a written statement that Carr and his campaign staff “respect the valid intellectual property rights of others and feel strongly about the rule of law.”
“The alleged photograph in question had no copyright notice,” Chalmers said. “As of now, neither the photographer nor any representative of his has reached out to the Carr campaign to notify it of any alleged rights violations or to ask that the photograph be removed. We are confident that, barring political posturing, this misunderstanding can be resolved.”
In early January, Atlanta commercial photographer Kevin Liles sued the Georgia Republican Party and Gov. Brian Kemp's campaign, contending they used his copyrighted photograph of Democratic challenger Stacey Abrams in a negative ad without permission. Liles' 2017 photograph previously had been published by The New York Times. Liebowitz and Rothman, an adjunct law professor at Emory University, also represent Liles.
Formal registration of a copyright is not required in order to have a copyright infringement claim, Judge Stanley Birch, a mediator and copyright expert who retired from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, told The Daily Report.
A copyright “comes into existence by operation of the law when you have a tangible expression that is made,” Birch said. That includes photographs “by professional photographers or anyone else.”
Birch also said he knows of no exception or exemption from copyright infringement statutes for political campaigns.
“The problem with political campaigns is that they may not have the level of sophistication or understanding” of copyright law, Birch said. “But that doesn't exempt them from a violation.”
“I suspect it's just a negligent thing on the part of the campaign,” he added. “It's thoughtless, really. The copyright area of the law [is one that] most people are totally unaware of.”
Birch said the cost of litigating a copyright complaint is what often discourages photographers and other artists from pursuing infringers in court, especially when “commercial usage of the photograph hasn't generated much money.”
As a result, he said, the public doesn't see many copyright cases.
“The amount of damages available to the plaintiff artist or photographer is fairly limited,” Birch said. “If there's an intentional infringement, that opens the door to attorney fees and other things. If it's just negligent infringement, the time and effort you would put into pursuing it has, probably, a minimal reward.”
“Ignorance of the law is never a defense,” Birch added. “What all these political campaigns need to know is, 'Hey, before you use a picture, you may want to find out who owns it.”
Read more:
Correction: This story has been updated to reflect that the photo in question is of Charlie Bailey.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'A 58-Year-Old Engine That Needs an Overhaul': Judge Wants Traffic Law Amended
3 minute readAppeals Court Removes Fulton DA From Georgia Election Case Against Trump, Others
6 minute readFamily of 'Cop City' Activist Killed by Ga. Troopers Files Federal Lawsuit
5 minute readFulton Judge Rejects Attempt by Trump Campaign Lawyer to Invalidate Guilty Plea in Georgia Election Case
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1As 'Red Hot' 2024 for Legal Industry Comes to Close, Leaders Reflect and Share Expectations for Next Year
- 2Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 3Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 4Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 5Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250