Fired Salesman Wins $1M Verdict Against Ex-Boss
A then 24-year-old salesman alleged his boss fired him out of jealousy and then falsely accused him of burglary. The charges were dropped, but the arrest record kept him from getting a new job. He tried to settle for $10,000 before trial.
January 30, 2019 at 05:19 PM
4 minute read
A salesman who sued his ex-boss for malicious prosecution and false arrest has won a $1 million judgment against his former employer.
Cobb County Superior Court Judge Reuben Green entered the judgment Monday following a trial that took a day and a half. The jury awarded $500,000 for general and special damages, $400,000 for punitive damages, and $100,000 for “peace, happiness and feelings damages.” The jury also added $3,291 for attorney fees and litigation expenses.
The winning lawyer, Reginald Greene of Greene Legal Group in Atlanta, said Wednesday he will be seeking interest, as well.
Greene said his client made an offer of settlement for $10,000. Instead, the employer offered $1,500.
“This case had dragged out so long, my client was actually willing to settle for $10,000 a year and a half ago,” Greene said. “Them trying to offer $1,500 seems like a slap in the face, now that you see the verdict.”
Greene represents Keenan Mays, who was 24 when the incident took place in January 2013. Mays alleged that his then-boss, Jamark Goodwin of Carly Ray Industries Inc., fired him in a fit of jealousy over a female employee and then filed a false police report. The complaint said Goodwin told Mays to come to the office of the glass repair business to pick up a final paycheck. When Mays appeared, Goodwin was not there. But he later told police that Mays had broken into the office.
Mays was arrested and jailed. Greene represented him in the criminal case, which was eventually dropped for lack of evidence. But the arrest on his record prevented Mays from being able to find another job, Greene said.
Romero Pearson of Pearson Law Group in Lawrenceville represented Goodwin and his company, which is now out of business. Pearson filed an answer to the lawsuit denying the charges without elaborating.
Pearson said Wednesday he will appeal the verdict but declined to comment further. Greene said Pearson cross-examined Mays and two other witnesses but did not present evidence or witnesses for the defense. And that wasn't the only factor that made for a fast trial. Greene said he opted for a six-person jury instead of 12, thinking that would make the trial move faster.
Greene said he had a clue the deliberations were going well for his client when the jury sent the judge a note asking if a plaintiffs verdict would help Mays clear up his record and get a new job. The judge answered that the jury was not to consider other factors outside the evidence presented.
In the end, Greene might have gotten some help from the #MeToo movement. The testimony and the complaint alleged that the boss openly used his position with the company to influence women—including a female employee that he encouraged to give police a false statement against Mays. The complaint alleged that the boss had become jealous of Mays as a potential rival for the attentions of women who worked in the business.
In his closing argument, Greene said he told the jury to “send a clear message to the Harvey Weinsteins and Bill Cosbys of the world.”
“I pulled out all the stops,” Greene said.
Greene's work is not done, however. Even if Goodwin's appeal fails, collection will be another challenge. Lacking deep pockets of an insurance company is not his favorite way to pursue a judgment, Greene said. That's why he sued the owner personally as well as the now-defunct company.
Said Greene, “We're going to aggressively pursue the guy.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllInsurer Not Required to Cover $29M Wrongful Death Judgment, Appeals Court Rules
After 2024's Regulatory Tsunami, Financial Services Firms Hope Storm Clouds Break
Trending Stories
- 1'Largest Retail Data Breach in History'? Hot Topic and Affiliated Brands Sued for Alleged Failure to Prevent Data Breach Linked to Snowflake Software
- 2Former President of New York State Bar, and the New York Bar Foundation, Dies As He Entered 70th Year as Attorney
- 3Legal Advocates in Uproar Upon Release of Footage Showing CO's Beat Black Inmate Before His Death
- 4Longtime Baker & Hostetler Partner, Former White House Counsel David Rivkin Dies at 68
- 5Court System Seeks Public Comment on E-Filing for Annual Report
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250